NY sues NAI so you can say McAfee sucks
The State of New York has filed suit against Network Associates over outrageous EULA terms forbidding users and journalists to speak ill of the company's security and anti-virus product, Reuters reports.
NAI has the nerve to require the company's consent before anyone can publish reviews of its products or disclose to any third party the results of benchmarks comparing NAI products against the competition, the wire service says.
According to the suit, the odious clause is "unenforceable, illegal and deceptive." Not to mention arrogant, despicable and shamefully cowardly.
For its part NAI claims never to have enforced the shrink-wrap contract, though Reuters cites an instance where they at least tried, ordering Network World magazine to "retract a July 1999 review of its Gauntlet firewall product."
"John Gallant, president and editorial director of Network World, said Network Associates mentioned in an e-mail that the review violated the license agreement clause, but primarily had complaints about facts in the review. The magazine did not change its article."
The suit is seeking $2000 in court costs and 50 cents for each instance of the appearance of the illegal clause, which could add up to a hefty sum.
We hope.
- Enron - the DRAM angle
- HPaQ deal will 'create chaos - Jack Welch
- MS chief lashes out at German Free Software petition
- MS bitten by old .NET vulnerability
- Nvidia takes on allcomers with GeForce 4
- VIA uncorks bottlenecks with P4 DDR mobo
- Motorola samples 200Mhz+ Palm chips
- Palm unveils new OS, but defers big-bang to 2003
- HPaQ timetables merger vote
- So farewell then, 3dfx.com
- STMicroelectronics scraps PC graphics biz
- Best Buy offers, withdraws, $129 GeForce-4
- IE bug allows full MSN Messenger hijack
- Elsa derailed by closed credit lines
- New G4 roadmaps promise Apple harvest
- EFF urges support for Philips' stand on protected CDs
- Crusoe blade server pioneer picks Intel
- IBM Memory Keys in mystery virus infection




