Temperatures, Overclocking

Ad

With its low power consumption at idle and high-but-not-excessive consumption under load, we were relatively sure that with the GT200 Nvidia would maintain the reputation they’ve had since the GeForce 7800 GTX as a maker of relatively quiet high-end cards. We were wrong.

gtx 260 280

During Windows startup, the GT200 fan was quiet (running at 516 rpm, or 30% of its maximum rate). Then, once a game was started, it suddenly turned into a washing machine, reaching a noise level that was frankly unbearable – especially the 280 GTX. The 260 GTX did slightly better, but also became noisy at 1250 rpm (the noise of the air flow, not of the fan itself). We should tell you, however, that our at-idle readings are taken after all our benchmarks have been run, after just a few minutes at idle. The problem is that the 280 GTX never really goes back to its minimum level, and the 260 GTX’ fan, while it does better, still runs at 700 rpm – though that’s relatively quiet.

These results at idle are hard to understand given the GT200’s low at-rest power consumption, and must be the fault either of a problem with the BIOS (though it showed up on two different cards) or the drivers, which leaves hope for some progress. If not, it’ll still possible to slow the fan manually using special software, provided you keep an eye on temperatures (see the next page). Still, the fans are a big disappointment with these cards, especially when you consider that they blow part of the hot air back into the case and so contribute to heating it, which in turn causes the GPU fan to crank up, not to mention the other components.

Finally, we noted that, as in the case of power consumption, the results for the 3870 X2 under load were abnormally good, for the same reason: Test Drive Unlimited is one of the rare games with which only one of the card’s GPUs is really used, which limits heating.

Overclocking

In overclocking tests, we were able to push the GeForce 260 GTX from 576/1242/999 MHz (GPU/ALU/memory) to 648/1397/1184 MHz, or 12% and 18% respectively. That’s good, and let us squeeze out a gain of 16%, or 8.4 frames per second, at 2560*1600 with Test Drive Unlimited – only 6% slower than the 280 GTX!

Except that obviously we overclocked it too – from 602/1296/1107 MHz to 655/1410/1290 with very good stability, for gains of 9% and 16%. Test Drive Unlimited again benefited from the boost with a 13% increase in frame rate – which is quite good even next to the 16% we got with the 9800 GTX. Overall, those results are very coherent, especially for overclocking, which is not an exact science.


  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment
  • Content also available in:
Ad
Talkback
samuraiblade 16/06/2008 03:40
Hide
-0+
samuraiblade

hmm not as big an improvement as i thought. will have to wait and see on the drivers improving the cards , but the 260 gtx seems to be the much better option given the price. still , will have to see what ati bring to the fray first. patience will be reflected in price i have no doubt.

spuddyt 16/06/2008 04:45
Hide
-0+
spuddyt

frankly depressing, Me WANTS MRAW POWER!!!!

JDocs 17/06/2008 09:46
Hide
-0+
JDocs

I am so disappointed. Now if AMD delivers on the dual GPU single memory rumour (2 GPUs on a single card but without the Crossfire problems) NVidia could have a serious problem.

mi1ez 17/06/2008 09:49
Hide
-0+
mi1ez

Why have they tested this system with only 2Gb of RAM? If you're testing a GPU with 1Gb of VRAM, surely you'd have more installed?

mi1ez 17/06/2008 10:27
Hide
-0+
mi1ez

They also have 2 conflicting prices on page 28.
For the 280GTX- $846 and $650;
For the 260GTX- $450 and $400

darthpoik 17/06/2008 02:06
Hide
-0+
darthpoik

Wouldn't it have been more prudent to test against a 8800gtx ultra as this is still the single most powerfull card.

david__t 17/06/2008 02:10
Hide
-0+
david__t

It might just be me but 66.5dBa is unbearable unless you have your PC locked away in a cupboard somewhere. This business of supplying substandard fans on very expensive cards is intolerable. Why don't they strike a deal with Zalman / Thermalright for example, and ship cards that are quiet / silent? I'm sure that people who have the money to buy a £500 GPU could afford £10 more for a better cooling solution that's included.

Anonymous 17/06/2008 04:26
Hide
-0+

where is that 20W to 30W idle you are talking about? The least in the graph is 199W!

Solitaire 17/06/2008 06:46
Hide
-0+
Solitaire

mi1ez: Probably the reason for just 2GB RAM was that it allowed Tom's to stick with 32-bit OS architecture. If they tried using more RAM they'd be stuck with 64-bit Bindows which would not be pretty - aside from really needing 8GB to give a big difference over 2GB in 32bit Vista, there's the slight issue of stable signed drivers, which these cards probably won't have for a while. Good luck trying to get Vista 64 to even "see" the cards! XD

jhoravi: that idle power would only come up on newer nVidia mobos as the card would be shut down entirely when idle and hand over to the integrated chip.

And was it me or was the Noise text copypasted over the Temperature text on the next page? Oops.

bobwya 19/06/2008 01:43
Hide
-0+
bobwya

Lets try again Mr THG (uhhhm try getting your fraking website working plz)...

Now lets see this puppy in action:
http://www.evga.com/products/pdf/01G-P3-1289-AR.pdf

!!

Bob

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads
Ad