Call of Duty 4
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: nvidia, gtx, 280
Call of Duty 4
While the 280 GTX placed high with Call of Duty 4, beating the 9800 GTX by between 41% (1920*1200) and 91% (2560*1600 + filters), the 9800 GX2 put up a good fight. It even surpassed the 280 at 1920*1200 (and by a hefty 17%), probably due to its greater number of texture units, which was the only theoretical value for which the recent Nvidia bi-GPU card had the advantage over the new cards. On a 30" display, the memory bandwidth and especially the doubled memory quantity gave the 280 GTX the lead in extremis, but only with 4X antialiasing enabled (the game was still playable). That led us to start suspecting we might have some close results testing these cards… Note that the 260 GTX had a 21 to 28% lag behind its big sister, which is in line with its specifications; it was well ahead of the 8800 Ultra, but clearly behind the 9800 GX2 in this test.
- Previous page Flight Simulator
- Next page Test Drive Unlimited
- Quad SLI Vs. 3-Way SLI
- Comparative Component Charts
- Best Graphics Cards for the Money: June 08
- Radeon 3850 AGP Plus Single-Core CPU
- GPU vs. CPU Upgrade: Extensive Tests
- NForce 780a SLI Debuts Hybrid SLI
- How To Overclock Your Graphics Card
- PCI Express 2.0 Graphics Cards: How Much Extra Performance Do They...
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 Review
hmm not as big an improvement as i thought. will have to wait and see on the drivers improving the cards , but the 260 gtx seems to be the much better option given the price. still , will have to see what ati bring to the fray first. patience will be reflected in price i have no doubt.
frankly depressing, Me WANTS MRAW POWER!!!!
I am so disappointed. Now if AMD delivers on the dual GPU single memory rumour (2 GPUs on a single card but without the Crossfire problems) NVidia could have a serious problem.
Why have they tested this system with only 2Gb of RAM? If you're testing a GPU with 1Gb of VRAM, surely you'd have more installed?
They also have 2 conflicting prices on page 28.
For the 280GTX- $846 and $650;
For the 260GTX- $450 and $400
Wouldn't it have been more prudent to test against a 8800gtx ultra as this is still the single most powerfull card.
It might just be me but 66.5dBa is unbearable unless you have your PC locked away in a cupboard somewhere. This business of supplying substandard fans on very expensive cards is intolerable. Why don't they strike a deal with Zalman / Thermalright for example, and ship cards that are quiet / silent? I'm sure that people who have the money to buy a £500 GPU could afford £10 more for a better cooling solution that's included.
where is that 20W to 30W idle you are talking about? The least in the graph is 199W!
mi1ez: Probably the reason for just 2GB RAM was that it allowed Tom's to stick with 32-bit OS architecture. If they tried using more RAM they'd be stuck with 64-bit Bindows which would not be pretty - aside from really needing 8GB to give a big difference over 2GB in 32bit Vista, there's the slight issue of stable signed drivers, which these cards probably won't have for a while. Good luck trying to get Vista 64 to even "see" the cards! XD
jhoravi: that idle power would only come up on newer nVidia mobos as the card would be shut down entirely when idle and hand over to the integrated chip.
And was it me or was the Noise text copypasted over the Temperature text on the next page? Oops.
Lets try again Mr THG (uhhhm try getting your fraking website working plz)...
Now lets see this puppy in action:
http://www.evga.com/products/pdf/01G-P3-1289-AR.pdf
!!
Bob