Flight Simulator X
Flight Simulator X is often considered, and rightly so, to be an application that’s limited by the processor. That remains true in a lot of ways, given the similar performance of most GeForce 8s at all resolutions except 1920x1200 with the filters activated for this title, but we noticed that the driver also has its importance. As a result, AMD was significantly behind, peaking at less than 22 frames per second, even with the 3870 X2 (which is 25% less than the 8800 GTX/Ultra).
Conversely, the 174.53 driver seemed to squeeze a little more performance out of the G92 -the 9800 GTX posted 10% better performance than the 8800 GTS 512 MB (and even 24% better at 1920x1200 with the filters activated), whereas the GTS never managed to move ahead of the 8800 GT, even though their specifications are further apart. And the 8800 GTS 512 MB and the 8800 GT share the same driver.
- Previous page The Point Of View 9800 GTX
- Next page Call Of Duty 4
- Nvidia GeForce 9800 GX2 Review
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for Your Money: March 2008
- Nvidia's GeForce 9600 GT Reviewed
- Fresh from Canada - ATI's Radeon HD 3450 and HD 3650
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for Your Money: February 2008
- ATI R680: the Rage Fury MAXX 2?
- Crossfire meets PCI Express 2.0 – More Lanes, More Frames?
- GeForce 8800 GT 256 and late 2007 3D Cards Roundup
- GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB: A Christmas Miracle?
- Finding The World's Best Hardware Prices: Shop Globally
Still no reason to upgrade form an 8800 GT or GTS (512) though
DAMMIT need to pull their finger out, so Nvidia wont fob us of with the "upgrades" and get on with some new research!
The fact the review contains the addition of an LED on the PCB tells you all you need to know...
Unless being an audiophile or wanting to play games at highest resolution with AA on, I believe the performance recap tells you all your need to know. This may well not be a revolution, but it's good bang for the buck.
WHAT! am i the only one who thinks this review is nothing but a load of rubbish?
this is nothing more than an overclocked 8800GTS 512...
shame on you, TH, for that terrible review.
what? why? they have to review it - and they tell us its more or less an OC'd 8800gts
For those who already have an 8800GTX or Ultra, it's about half as fast as desired and of no 'purchasing' interest whatsoever. For everyone else it looks like a well priced buy.
I want a card that uses less power, makes less noise, costs a lot less and get great frame rates.
But; I like the heat mine kicks out as it keeps my feet warm in the winter. I'll need a cooler card summer maybe.
I'll not be getting a new gfx card for a few years, so the above may happen.
There’s no doubt that it’s a good value card, but it really does not warrant the GTX moniker. When the 8800GTX replaced the 7800GTX there was a significant increase in performance. The increase in performance from a standard 8800GTX and the 9800GTX is a bit of a joke. I'm running a BFG 8800GTX OC2 and the 9800GTX in no way attracts my attention. The 9800GTX may run cooler and quieter, but for those of us interested in best in class performance, these are not normally factors that would sway our buying decisions.
I have the new 9800 GTX and i have to say it is well worth the buy, it melts your face running everything on HD a really good card to buy
WATAFAK these cards have better performance with AA AF turned ON than without it?????? Where are we........
u just have to wait till the new comer 9900GTX and 9900GT is out