Flight Simulator X
Ad



Flight Simulator doesn’t say much about the 9800 GX2’s performances except that it isn’t really that much faster than the 8800 Ultra. It’s even slower in 2560x1600 filters on. On the other hand, the Radeon HD 3870 X2 seems to be clearly left out as it doesn’t even allow smooth rendering in 1920x1200. Multi-GPU solutions aren’t only useless when playing Flight Simulator, they can even be harmful in some cases.
- Previous page The Review
- Next page Unreal Tournament III
Google Ads
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for Your Money: March 2008
- Nvidia's GeForce 9600 GT Reviewed
- Fresh from Canada - ATI's Radeon HD 3450 and HD 3650
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for Your Money: February 2008
- ATI R680: the Rage Fury MAXX 2?
- Crossfire meets PCI Express 2.0 – More Lanes, More Frames?
- GeForce 8800 GT 256 and late 2007 3D Cards Roundup
- GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB: A Christmas Miracle?
- Finding The World's Best Hardware Prices: Shop Globally
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: December 2007
Reviews
i like the nvidia chip here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU
Tough choice
I think most people were expecting the 9800GTX to be a 1Gb card with similar architecture to the 8800GTS but with a 512bit memory bus like AMD/ATI. A big disappointment about the memory architecture. Nvidia need a die shrink ASAP and a move to wider buses like ATI...
The problem of course is AMD/ATI not delivering in the processing power department with the 3870 (X2). Therefore there is no incentive for Nvidia to leap-frog a really powerful ATI GPU (like the X1900XTX situation).
Bob
*checks wallet*
*has wallet shot*
1 9800 GTX card should be Close to this card perfoamce wise (seen what the 9600gt does and it only has 64 SP the 8800 gts has 128 SP)