The Review
Because of the short time we had for this review, we focused on the most important matters, which meant comparing the performance of the GeForce 9800 GX2 with the Radeon HD 3870 X2 and the GeForce 8800 Ultra. You can check our 3870 X2 review for more results, including cards in CrossFire configuration. We’ll update you with the SLI scores when the drivers are ready.
Contrary to previous reviews, we focus here on Windows Vista, SP1, since many users want to be able to activate all graphical options, including DirectX 10, when using expensive cards such as the 9800 GX2. UAC, indexing, Superfetch and Aero were disabled during the benchmarks and the latest drivers and patches were applied.
A couple of new games are included. Flight Simulator X, despite being largely limited by CPU power, is very popular and does yield interesting results. Also, we have added Enemy Territory: Quake Wars because of its success and its MegaTexture technology. It’s the only exception to our rule, that all games should be evaluated under real life conditions using Fraps. The replay mode in Quake Wars is limited to 30 fps, forcing us to use the timedemo mode, which doesn’t reflect the game’s true performance, much slower than in timedemo mode. Test scenes for the other games were modified, except for Test Drive Unlimited and Call of Duty 4.
Finally, we’ve only used two resolutions: 1920x1200 - typical of 24-26" displays and of course 2560x1600 typical of 30" displays, in this case the Samsung 3054T. We believe those are the only two resolutions these kinds of cards are meant to play at. Below that (or up to 22"), investing so much in a powerful 3D card to get smooth rendering on most of today’s games is useless, as seen in our Radeon HD 3870 X2 review.
Test Setup:
Asus P5E3 Deluxe (Intel X38) Intel Core 2 Quad QX6850 (3 GHz) Crucial 2 x 1 GB DDR3 1333 MHz 7-7-7-20 Western Digital WD5000AAKS DVD Asus 12x Coolermaster RealPower Pro 850 W Windows Vista SP1 ForceWare 174.53 beta (9800 GX2) ForceWare 169.44 beta (8800 Ultra) Catalyst 8.3 WHQL- Previous page Specifications
- Next page Flight Simulator X
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for Your Money: March 2008
- Nvidia's GeForce 9600 GT Reviewed
- Fresh from Canada - ATI's Radeon HD 3450 and HD 3650
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for Your Money: February 2008
- ATI R680: the Rage Fury MAXX 2?
- Crossfire meets PCI Express 2.0 – More Lanes, More Frames?
- GeForce 8800 GT 256 and late 2007 3D Cards Roundup
- GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB: A Christmas Miracle?
- Finding The World's Best Hardware Prices: Shop Globally
- The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: December 2007
i like the nvidia chip here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU
Tough choice
I think most people were expecting the 9800GTX to be a 1Gb card with similar architecture to the 8800GTS but with a 512bit memory bus like AMD/ATI. A big disappointment about the memory architecture. Nvidia need a die shrink ASAP and a move to wider buses like ATI...
The problem of course is AMD/ATI not delivering in the processing power department with the 3870 (X2). Therefore there is no incentive for Nvidia to leap-frog a really powerful ATI GPU (like the X1900XTX situation).
Bob
*checks wallet*
*has wallet shot*
1 9800 GTX card should be Close to this card perfoamce wise (seen what the 9600gt does and it only has 64 SP the 8800 gts has 128 SP)