Next-Gen 7,200 RPM Notebook Hard Drives
Table of contents
- 1. Notebook Hard Drives Reach 90 MB/s
- 2. Options: Encryption, Free Fall Sensors
- 3. Hard Drives vs. Flash SSDs
- 4. Hitachi Travelstar 7K320
- 5. Samsung Spinpoint MP2 HM251JJ
- 6. Seagate Momentus 7200.3 ST9320421AS
- 7. Western Digital Scorpio WD3200BEKT
- 8. Test Setups
- 9. Results: Transfer Diagrams
- 10. Results: Access Time, Interface
- 11. Results: Read/Write Throughput
- 12. Results: PCMark05 Application Benchmark
- 13. Results: I/O Performance
- 14. Results: Efficiency for Workstation I/O
- 15. Results: Efficiency for Streaming Reads
- 16. Results: Power Requirements
- 17. Conclusion
160 GB, 200 GB, 250 GB, 320 GB: It’s amazing to follow the fast pace of progress in the notebook hard drive sector. Only six months ago, we looked at high-performance notebook hard drives, which had reached 200 GB capacities at that time. The latest high-performance product generation has not only increased the maximum capacity to a comfortable 320 gigabytes, but performance has also increased along the way.
High-Performance or Mainstream
When we refer to high-performance notebook drives, we’re talking about 7,200 RPM spindle speed units in the 2.5” form factor with a 9.5 mm height. Most 2.5” hard drives have this height of 9.5 mm, which allows them to be installed into all notebook computers designed for this industry standard. Some ultra-portable notebooks require 1.8” disk drives, though, while others offer additional space for 12.5 mm 2.5” drives (Hitachi’s 500-GB Travelstar 5K500 is a 12.5 mm drive).
Drive Features
High-performance drives running at 7,200 RPM typically get warmer, produce more noise and do not offer the same high capacities as mainstream drives that spin at a more conservative 5,400 RPM. Cache capacities vary between 8 MB and 16 MB, although the difference isn’t noticeable in typical use scenarios. All 2.5” high-end hard drives come with Serial ATA interfaces and support native command queuing (NCQ), which allows drives to reorder incoming commands for more efficient execution. All of this also applies to most of the mainstream drives. Whether SATA/150 or SATA/300 interface speeds are used does not matter in everyday life, as 2.5” drives cannot even come close to the 150 MB/s bandwidth of first-generation Serial ATA.
Some drives come with built-in encryption, while others feature a free-fall sensor, which is capable of parking the heads if increased acceleration is detected. This helps to avoid physical damage, if, for example, you drop your notebook by accident. Power management is another feature to which we dedicate additional testing in this article, as some drives offer more sophisticated power management than others.
Performance Counts
2.5” drives running at 4,200 RPM will die out by the end of the year, as the difference in cost, noise, heat and power consumption between 4,200 and 5,400 RPM is little, while performance is noticeably better at 5,400 RPM. The next step to 7,200 RPM further shortens access time and provides improved transfer rates at the expense of capacity. Since hard drives have always been the slowest core system component, this is usually a worthwhile trade off.
Latest Internal Storage News
- 09/02 – Laser Heat Used to Make HDD Write Transfers Faster
- 07/02 – Intel Introduces New 520 Series Line of SSDs
- 02/02 – Seagate Believes HDD Supply Disruption to Continue in 2012
- 01/02 – Other World Computing (OWC) Reveals Two New SSDs
- 28/01 – Cleversafe Announces 10 Exabyte Storage System Configuration
Latest Internal Storage reviews
- 09/02 – Momentus XT 750 GB Review: A Second-Gen Hybrid Hard Drive
- 06/02 – Intel SSD 520 Review: Taking Back The High-End With SandForce
- 01/02 – Upgrade Advice: Does Your Fast SSD Really Need SATA 6Gb/s?
- 26/01 – Install A Hard Drive Or SSD In Your Notebook's Optical Bay
- 24/01 – Best SSDs For The Money: January 2012

There is an apparent error on page 16. You state, "The WD Scorpio Black and Seagate’s Momentus 7200.3 do very well here.... they both require less than 0.8 W idle power." However, the bar to which you refer on the last chart entitled, "Lowest Drive Idle Power Requirement: Windows Vista without Drive Power Savings," is labeled as "Western Digital Scorpio WD2500BEVS, 250GB, 5400RPM, SATA 150." The bar which is labeled "Western Digital Scorpio WD3200BEKT, 320GB, 7200RPM, SATA 300," shows an idle power of 0.97 W. Either the bars are mislabeled or you accidentally looked at the wrong data for the WD Scorpio Black when writing your paragraph summary. I would like to know which is correct. Otherwise, this was a great article.
Can we get the Seagate Momentus 7200.4 500GB drive compared as well? I was just about to purchase a new drive when I saw that fella. Would be great to know how it shapes up compared to the 7200.3 and the Scorpio Black.