Next-Gen 7,200 RPM Notebook Hard Drives : Notebook Hard Drives Reach 90 MB/s
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: notebook, hard, drive
Notebook Hard Drives Reach 90 MB/s
160 GB, 200 GB, 250 GB, 320 GB: It’s amazing to follow the fast pace of progress in the notebook hard drive sector. Only six months ago, we looked at high-performance notebook hard drives, which had reached 200 GB capacities at that time. The latest high-performance product generation has not only increased the maximum capacity to a comfortable 320 gigabytes, but performance has also increased along the way.
High-Performance or Mainstream
When we refer to high-performance notebook drives, we’re talking about 7,200 RPM spindle speed units in the 2.5” form factor with a 9.5 mm height. Most 2.5” hard drives have this height of 9.5 mm, which allows them to be installed into all notebook computers designed for this industry standard. Some ultra-portable notebooks require 1.8” disk drives, though, while others offer additional space for 12.5 mm 2.5” drives (Hitachi’s 500-GB Travelstar 5K500 is a 12.5 mm drive).
Drive Features
High-performance drives running at 7,200 RPM typically get warmer, produce more noise and do not offer the same high capacities as mainstream drives that spin at a more conservative 5,400 RPM. Cache capacities vary between 8 MB and 16 MB, although the difference isn’t noticeable in typical use scenarios. All 2.5” high-end hard drives come with Serial ATA interfaces and support native command queuing (NCQ), which allows drives to reorder incoming commands for more efficient execution. All of this also applies to most of the mainstream drives. Whether SATA/150 or SATA/300 interface speeds are used does not matter in everyday life, as 2.5” drives cannot even come close to the 150 MB/s bandwidth of first-generation Serial ATA.
Some drives come with built-in encryption, while others feature a free-fall sensor, which is capable of parking the heads if increased acceleration is detected. This helps to avoid physical damage, if, for example, you drop your notebook by accident. Power management is another feature to which we dedicate additional testing in this article, as some drives offer more sophisticated power management than others.
Performance Counts
2.5” drives running at 4,200 RPM will die out by the end of the year, as the difference in cost, noise, heat and power consumption between 4,200 and 5,400 RPM is little, while performance is noticeably better at 5,400 RPM. The next step to 7,200 RPM further shortens access time and provides improved transfer rates at the expense of capacity. Since hard drives have always been the slowest core system component, this is usually a worthwhile trade off.
- Next page Options: Encryption, Free Fall Sensors
- SAS Storage: High-Performance Hard Drives
- 14-Way SSD Hard Drive Roundup
- Will SSDs Take Over The Enterprise?
- Enterprise RAID for $49: Ciprico VST Pro
- Flash SSD Update: More Results, Answers
- Half a Terabyte On Your Notebook
- The SSD Power Consumption Hoax
- Energy-Saving Hard Drives
- Comparative Component Charts
- Memoright SSDs: The End of Hard Drives?
- present-day atari
- Flash memory in Hybrid hard drives *save* power
- Compaq Presario R3000 power cord issue
- What can this do?
- Dell Notebook C400 Primary Hard Disk Drive 0 not found
- HD problems on HP Pavillion ze5602ea notebook
- Deskpro BIOS....
- FOR SALE:SAMSUNG OMNIA,APPLE IPHONE 16GB 3G,SONY ERICSSON XPERIA X1
- HP notebook annoying popping and clicking sounds
- Brand New Nokia N96 16GB $290, Apple iphone 16GB 3G $370

There is an apparent error on page 16. You state, "The WD Scorpio Black and Seagate’s Momentus 7200.3 do very well here.... they both require less than 0.8 W idle power." However, the bar to which you refer on the last chart entitled, "Lowest Drive Idle Power Requirement: Windows Vista without Drive Power Savings," is labeled as "Western Digital Scorpio WD2500BEVS, 250GB, 5400RPM, SATA 150." The bar which is labeled "Western Digital Scorpio WD3200BEKT, 320GB, 7200RPM, SATA 300," shows an idle power of 0.97 W. Either the bars are mislabeled or you accidentally looked at the wrong data for the WD Scorpio Black when writing your paragraph summary. I would like to know which is correct. Otherwise, this was a great article.