Intel D875PBZ: Spartan, Slow, Expensive, Continued
Intel D875PBZ: Spartan, Slow, Expensive, Continued

Overclocking fans will be disappointed - there are no features, apart from the auto burn function, which prompts the question: which customer is supposed to use this function?
A glance at the benchmark rating shows that the board was below average in all the tests. Out of all the tested candidates, Intel works with the most conservative memory timings; fast CL2.0-2-2.5 timings are not even possible. The bottom line is that this is an extremely pricey, below-average board: just under $200 for zero features - the sales figures will certainly reflect the customers' opinion on this.

Hardware monitor.

Intel - there are no accessories provided.
Our assessment in brief: Intel shocked the THG laboratory with its totally overpriced board - just under $200 without any additional equipment should put the user off buying. Performance is also below average - internal corporate policy prevents better performance. In our view, Intel is blatantly abusing its market position and its name - after all, the manufacturer does not have to pay any license fees for its own chips.
- Previous page Intel D875PBZ: Spartan, Slow, Expensive
- Next page Intel D865PERL: Potential For Fine...
- Upgrading to Hyper-Threading? The PL-iP4 Adapter from PowerLeap
- Faster and Faster, nForce2: The Latest Boards Put to the Test
- MSI Admits to FSB Overclocking
- One Tough Cookie: 10 Boards with Intel i875P Chipset: Part I
- Rambus Is Alive: SiS 658 In An Exclusive Test
- More nForce2: New Boards from Abit, Biostar and MSI
- Pentium 4 with Dual DDR: Endurance Test of Seven Motherboards with...
- The End User Pays: 13 Boards With Intel 845GE/PE
- The Economical Way to a Pentium 4 System: Five Motherboards with...
- Athlon On The Fast Lane: Three Motherboards with nForce2-Chipset...