Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

EU Ends Microsoft Antitrust Probe; Hello Browsers!

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

The browser ballot is officially called the Choice Screen.

The European Union hasn't been looking too kindly on Microsoft and its supposed anticompetitive acts in bundling Internet Explorer in with Windows. But today, the European Commission has settled its dispute with Microsoft after the world's largest software maker agreed to implement changes in how its Windows OS integrates the browser.

The European Commission today announced that it adopted a decision that renders legally binding commitments offered by Microsoft to boost competition on the web browser market starting March 2010.

The accepted decision, of course, is that Microsoft will provide a "choice screen" where Windows users will be able to pick between Opera, Chrome, Safari, Firefox, AOL, Maxthon, K-Meleon, Flock, Avant Browser, Sleipnir, Slim Browser and Internet Explorer. As many of Microsoft's competitors requested, the choice screen will feature browsers in a randomized order.

European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said: "Millions of European consumers will benefit from this decision by having a free choice about which web browser they use. Such choice will not only serve to improve people's experience of the internet now but also act as an incentive for web browser companies to innovate and offer people better browsers in the future."

Under the commitments approved by the Commission, Microsoft will make available for five years in the European Economic Area (through the Windows Update mechanism) a choice screen enabling users of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 to choose which web browsers they want to install in addition to, or instead of, Microsoft's browser Internet Explorer. The commitments also provide that computer manufacturers will be able to install competing web browsers, set those as default and turn Internet Explorer off.

A clause in the commitments allows the European Commission to review the commitments in two years. Microsoft will report regularly to the Commission, starting in six months' time, on the implementation of the commitments and under certain conditions make adjustments to the choice screen upon the Commission's request.

If Microsoft were to break its commitments, the European Commission could impose a fine of up to 10 percent of Microsoft's total annual turnover without having to prove any violation of EU antitrust rules.

Share:
6
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
Anonymous 16/12/2009 23:00
Hide
-4+

And while we're at it, why don't we let Apple implement the same thing, hmm? No Safari as default, whaddya say?
I am no MS fanboy, but I must say I find the hypocrisy amusing sometimes...

Anonymous 17/12/2009 09:51
Hide
-1+

@ Aquila

Apple hasn't got a monopoly on the OS market has it.

ukctstrider 17/12/2009 12:18
Hide
-1+

No but the amount of attention they get you'd think they do...

Apple are largely irrelevant in any large scale discussions. That said given that they whinge about Microsoft's anticompetitive methods all the time, shouldn't they have to abide by the same rules?

david__t 17/12/2009 12:34
Hide
-0+

cheradenine - Oh that makes it alright then - 1 rule for 1 and 1 for everyone else. Apple does have a monopoly - you get the browser that they decide when you install MacOS and therefore have no choice - a la Windows. As the decision is aimed at promoting other companies to make browsers, it is a ruling about choice not about who has a monopoly - MS will still rule the market after this decision - Customers will ask for IE from the OEMs because most users have never even heard of most of the browsers mentioned above.
Maybe we should have a choice of Dashboards on the Xbox / PS3, or maybe there should be many different versions of Teletext? Honestly, other than the stupid Patents being granted in the USA, this is the most ridiculous case of recent times.

Micropat 17/12/2009 20:39
Hide
-0+

Unless I'm misunderstanding something that 10% without having to prove anything seems extremely harsh.

Anonymous 10/01/2010 14:33
Hide
-0+

Not having to prove antitrust, but that's not saying they don't have to prove that the agreement was breached does it?

Best offers

Newsletters


OK