Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 485M

Malibal's Lotus P150HM: GeForce GTX 485M Gets Its Game On
By

Nvidia’s GTX 485M looks almost exactly like its most recent preceding product, and there’s a good reason for that.

It appears that this is a different version of the same IC, with the added memory expanding its bus width from 192- to 256-bits. We pressed further to see exactly how this GPU stacked up to its relatives.

We had heard that the GeForce GTX 470M would have the “fully functional” version of the desktop GeForce GTX 460’s GPU. But as it turns out that honor was reserved for the GeForce GTX 485M. The GTX 460 was a great card for its time, even winning our coveted awards for both its single-GPU performance-value and its amazing SLI scaling. Naturally we have high hopes for it here.

Desktop Versus Mobile GeForce Graphics
 Desktop GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 485MDesktop GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 470M
Transistors1.95 billion1.95 billion1.95 billion1.95 billion
Engine Clock822 MHz575 MHz650 MHz535 MHz
CUDA Cores384384288288
Texture Units64644848
ROP Units32323224
Compute Performance1.26 TFLOPS883.2 GFLOPS855 GFLOPS634 GFLOPS
DRAM TypeGDDR5-4000GDDR5-3000GDDR5-3400GDDR5-3000
DRAM Interface256-bits256-bits256-bits192-bits
Memory Bandwidth128 GB/s96 GB/s108.8 GB/s72 GB/s
TDP170W100W150W50W (GPU Only)


Notice that the GeForce GTX 485M’s main specs closely match the GeForce GTX 560 Ti. Nvidia remains mum on whether the GTX 485M is based on the GTX 460’s original GF104 core or GTX 560 Ti’s revised GF114 (Ed.: all indications point to this being GF104), but we’re certain that the clock-optimizations made in the GTX 560 Ti conversion are not needed at the GTX 485M’s lower frequencies.

Nvidia is going further to enhance the power-to-performance of its top-end notebook model. Though, like all of Nvidia’s notebook parts, value has been forcefully thrown kicking and screaming out the top-floor window of a 32-story building, its remains stamped into dust by Nvidia’s marketing department.

According to the price sheets of various Clevo partners, this bare module costs approximately four times as much as a theoretical 2 GB desktop GeForce GTX 460 with all of its insides turned on. We blame neither Clevo nor Malibal, as this appears to be specifically related to Nvidia’s mobile GPU pricing structure. To be fair, AMD employs a similar practice, marking up its own mobile parts to cost significantly more than their desktop equivalents.

We're sure both companies would try to justify the increase with discussions of thermal engineering and volume. But it's hard to ignore the naming that at least suggests you're getting something as fast as a GeForce GTX 480 (there is no 485 on the desktop) or Radeon HD 6970, when in fact these are lower-performance versions of derivative chips (in Nvidia's case) or completely different architectures (in AMD's). This is one of those situations where it certainly pays to educate yourself before buying. Customers who don't, and end up drawing those parallels between mobile and desktop model names, are setting themselves up for disappointment.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display 1 comment.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    mi1ez , 15 February 2011 19:10
    What's the price difference between the 485M and 6970M?