Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
In the "Office performance" category, the Intel Celeron 1200 is well ahead of the AMD Duron 1100. Here you can see the effect of Celeron's 256 kB L2 cache.
Internet Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The difference in the Sysmark 2001 "Internet content creation" category is huge: the Celeron 1200 leads with close to 30 percent more performance.
Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The Celeron 1200's advantage in "office productivity" is not as great.
3D Rendering Performance/Windows 2000: Cinema 4D XL
This benchmark just slightly favors the AMD Duron 1100.
Read more
Sponsored
Latest CPU News
- 24/05 – Nvidia to Push Tablet Prices to $199 With Kai Platform
- 23/05 – AMD Backing Out of CPU Speed Wars Against Intel
- 22/05 – AMD Hitting The Casino Floor With Embedded R-Series
- 22/05 – Does Your AMD FX Platform BSOD with Steam? Read This.
- 20/05 – Intel To Support Cheap Ultrabooks With Low-Cost Celerons
Latest CPU reviews
- 24/05 – Overclocking Core i7-3770K: Learning To Live With Compromise
- 22/05 – Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
- 15/05 – AMD A10-4600M Review: Mobile Trinity Gets Tested
- 14/05 – Core i7-3720QM: Ivy Bridge Makes Its Mark On Mobility
- 23/04 – Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up From Sandy Bridge
