Intel Not Shaken by Microsoft's Itanium Phase Out
Only six percent of Itanium systems run Microsoft Windows.
Earlier this week, Microsoft announced that it will be ending support for Intel's Itanium IA64 architecture after Windows Server 2008 R2's extended support runs out in eight years' time. While having the world's largest software maker saying that it'll no longer be supporting your technology may worry most companies, Intel isn't one of them.
In fact, most of the Itanium servers around the world do not run Microsoft Windows as Patrick Ward, an Intel spokesperson, explained to Xbit Labs: "Windows represents less than 6% of current Itanium sales according to IDC's Q3 2009 server tracker report. Most Itanium users run Unix, specifically HP-UX. Those customers would argue that the combination of HP-UX and the Itanium platform represent a very formidable mission-critical solution, which many of the world's leading companies have chosen."
Intel may have launched its impressive Nehalem-EX architecture in the new Xeon 7500 processor line, the chipmaker still sees the Itanium as the choice for mission critical customers.
"For pure performance, you might go with Xeon processors, but the mission critical customers Itanium targets are most interested in reliability, serviceability and availability features across the operating system, processors and other aspects of their enterprise computing infrastructure. Processor performance is only one aspect of what interests them," said Ward.
So, even though Microsoft and Red Hat have decided to leave Itanium support by the wayside, Intel sees a continued need for its IA64 processor technology.
- itanium ,
- ia64 ,
- windows-server ,
- unix
- Report: Steam Has a Monopoly Over PC Gaming
- AMD Launches ATI FirePro V8800; Cheap at $1499
- Windows Phone 7, Silverlight is Business-Ready
- Sick of Apple News on Tom's Hardware? Read This
- Deals for April 7: HP 18.4" dv8t, Dell ST2010 LCD
- Two ''Pro Series'' Workstations from Shuttle Soon
- Iron Man Fanatic Builds His Own JARVIS
- How to Fix Windows 7 When It Fails to Boot
- Supernode Expands up to 128 Cores, 2TB RAM
- $259.60: Cost of Components to an iPad 16GB
- IT Software Vendor, CA, to Cut 1,000 Jobs
- Say Goodbye to the "I'm a Mac/I'm a PC" Ads!
- TSA: We Don't Need to See Your Netbooks, Tablets
- New IBM Platform Rivals Oracle's Exadata
- Business Warming Up to Windows 7, Cooling on XP
- Dell Adds New Business Notebooks to E Series
- New Unisys Enterprise Servers Support Intel Xeon
- Deals for April 8: Modern Warfare 2 MP Free Days






Now with less opportunities to compare performance of IA64 with X86-64 systems with the same software. Oh! you don't care about comparing performance just the marketing of bigger is better. And the IA64 system cost is always a big number.
I think it's a shame really, the IA64 architecture has incredible potential, and will make a comeback in the future without doubt. Granted the consumer markets are nowhere near ready for the drastic computing changes required to migrate to a completely new instruction set, but down the line we will see incredible restrictions in how far we can push the x86 performance envelope.