Page 1:The New iPad: Let's Get Technical
Page 2:Why We Need (Or At Least Want) HD Tablets...
Page 3:When It Comes To Subpixels, Smaller Is Better
Page 4:Better Color And Adobe RGB Performance
Page 5:Safari Downsamples Your Images, No HD
Page 6:CPU And GPU Performance: All About Graphics
Page 7:The New iPad: The Best-Looking, With Caveats
CPU And GPU Performance: All About Graphics
The CPU: A9 Flavour
The iPad 3 features a new SoC, the A5X. Like the preceding A5, it features a dual-core A9 ARM processor clocked at 1 GHz. We've covered the architecture of the A9 in the past, so we won't revisit the details, but for those interested in a deeper discussion, you can head back to our original A5 coverage.
|Apple A4 (iPad)||Apple A5 (iPad 2)||Apple A5X|
|Fab Node||45 nm||45 nm ||45 nm|
|Processor||1 GHz ARM Cortex-A8 (single-core)||1 GHz ARM Cortex-A9 (dual-core)|
|Memory||256 MB LP-DDR||512 MB LP-DDR2||1 GB LP-DDR2|
|Graphics||PowerVR SGX535 (single-core)||PowerVR SGX545MP2 (dual-core)||PowerVR SGX545MP4 (quad-core)|
|32 KB / 32 KB||32 KB / 32 KB|
|L2 Cache||640 KB||1 MB|
On paper, there's really nothing to suggest improved CPU performance from the A5X. There's no change in cache size, and though there's apparently twice as much on-die RAM, it has no impact on raw computational horsepower. The new A5X seems intended to help improve multitasking support and enable a beefier graphics engine, so our GeekBench results are, not surprisingly, largely unchanged.
|GeekBench v2.2.7 Results||iPad 2||iPad 3||Dell Mini 1012||LePan II||Transformer Prime|
|CPU||Apple A5||Apple A5X||Atom N450||APQ8060||Tegra 3|
|Architecture||Dual-core A9||Dual-core A9||Single-Core Atom||Dual-core Scorpion||Quad-core A9|
|Speed||1 GHz||1 GHz||1.66 GHz||1.2 GHz||1.4 GHz|
The GPU: Double Your Pleasure
One aspect of Apple's A5X truly shines: graphics performance. Since an ultra-high-resolution display is the iPad 3’s core selling point, Apple's A5X features a significantly more powerful graphics engine optimized for the Retina display. This increases gaming potential by a lot. In fact, Apple claims the iPad 3 offers double the graphics performance of the iPad 2. How is this possible?
|GPU System-on-Chip||PowerVR SGX 535|
|PowerVR SGX 543|
|Bus Width (in bits)||64 ||64|
|Triangle rate @ 200 MHz||14 MTriangles/s||35 MTriangles/s|
Apple still employs Imagination's PowerVR SGX543 architecture, used in the iPad 2. But whereas the iPad 2 was limited to a dual-core implementation (SGX543MP2), the iPad 3’s A5X sports a muscular quad-core GPU (SGX543MP4). Incidentally, Sony's PlayStation Vita also uses the SGX543MP4.
That hardware change is easy to spot when you inspect the A5X's die. In the annotated layout above, you can quite clearly identify each of the four GPU cores. It also appears that RAM accesses has changed to accommodate the increased need for bandwidth. The A5 employed a pair of memory interfaces; UBM's image above suggests four on the A5X. To get a more illustrative story, though, let's look at GLBenchmark.
|iPad 2||iPad 3||Kindle Fire||LePan II||Transformer Prime|
|GPU||PowerVR SGX543MP2||PowerVR SGX543MP4||PowerVR|
|Adreno 220||Tegra 3 (ULP GeForce)|
|Egypt Standard*||6661 frames (59 FPS)||6709 frames (59 FPS)||2847 frames (25 FPS)||3485 frames (31 FPS)||5388 frames (48 FPS)|
|Egypt Fixed Time Step*||47.598 s (59 FPS)||47.261 s (60 FPS)||116.138 s||112.659 s (25 FPS)||69.055 s (41 FPS)|
|Egypt Off Screen (720p)||10 146 frames (90 FPS)||15 663 frames (139 FPS)||2516 frames (22 FPS)||3603 frames (32 FPS)||6496 (58 FPS)|
|Pro Standard*||2962 frames (59 FPS)||2975 frames (60 FPS)||1981 frames (39 FPS)||2140 frames (43 FPS)||2726 frames (54 FPS)|
|Pro Fixed Time Step*||20.868 s (60 FPS)||20.857 s (60 FPS)||34.658 s||31.982 s (39 FPS)||24.189 s (52 FPS)|
|Pro Off Screen (720p)||7352 frames (147 FPS)||12546 frames (251 FPS)||2277 frames (46 FPS)||2332 frames (47 FPS)||3717 frames (74 FPS)|
According to the standard tests in GLBenchmark, nearly identical scores on the iPad 2 and iPad 3 imply similar perceived overall gaming performance. That doesn't seem like it'd blow you away, but it's actually pretty amazing when you consider the iPad 3's 2048x1536 native resolution. Comparing these two devices at their native resolutions is by no means an apples-to-apples match-up. But it is cool that the iPad 3’s A5X delivers the same performance with four GPU cores at 2048x1536 resolution as the iPad 2’s A5 with two cores at 1024x768.
Comparing the raw graphics performance of each hardware implementation using GLBenchmark's off-screen tests reveals that the A5X delivers about 1.5-2x more performance than the A5. More interestingly, the Tegra 3-based Transformer Prime actually falls behind the older iPad 2. In fact, when we compare the Transformer Prime to the iPad 3, we see a two- to three-fold jump in performance favouring Apple's tablet.
|GLBenchmark 2.1.2||iPad 2||iPad 3|
|Triangle Test||65.0 Mtriangles/sec||129.2 Mtriangles/sec|
|Triangle Texture Test||58.0 Mtriangles/sec||120.8 Mtriangles/sec|
|Triangle Texture Test, Vertex Lit||45.6 Mtriangles/sec||93.6 Mtriangles/sec|
|Triangle Texture Test, Fragment Lit||43.5 triangles/sec||92.3 Mtriangles/sec|
According to Imagination, its PowerVR tile-based deferred rendering architecture is highly dependent on memory bandwidth, which means there's a direct relationship between throughput and triangle rates. Based on our results from the iPad 3, it's pretty clear that graphics performance improvements are related both to a more complex GPU and greater bandwidth. The iPad 2 and iPad 3 seemingly both employ 1066 MT/s LP-DDR2 by way of a dual-channel configuration. However, the iPad 3 utilizes four 32-bit memory interfaces, which is two more than its predecessor.