Intel Finally Has a Real 4 GHz CPU
Intel has quietly introduced its first CPU that is capable of running at 4 GHz clock speed off the shelf.
An updated spec sheet reveals that the recently introduced Xeon E3-1290 runs at 3.6 GHz with four cores, but the chip's turbo boost will scale the clock speed to 4.0 GHz when running on only one core. What makes this processor particularly interesting is the fact that it is closely related to the i7-2000 Sandy Bridge series, which would indicate that Intel could be launching a 4 GHz desktop processor as well.
Intel pulled a single core 4 GHz processor back in October 2004 due to the increasingly high power consumption and current leakage in its 90 nm Netburst architecture. The highest clock speed reached by its Pentium family was 3.8 GHz, which was posted by its Pentium 4 HT 570/571 models, which were based on the 90 nm Prescott core. Back then Intel drastically changed its strategy from clock speed scaling to lower power processors that were largely based on technology introduced with the Banias Pentium M processor in 2003. That new strategy resulted in Intel's Core 2 Duo processors with Conroe core in 2006. With a look at power consumption, I should note that the Pentium 4 570 was rated at a thermal design power of 115 watts, while the E3-1290 runs at a maximum of 95 watts. The first dual-core processors, which were available up to 3.6 GHz (Pentium D 900 series), consumed as much as 130 watts.
There appear to be signs that both Intel and AMD are engaging in a careful gigahertz race again. AMD currently tops out at 3.7 GHz and we would expect its Zambezi desktop processors to easily reach 4 GHz later this year.
- Samsung Could Add Sky Player to Android Phones
- Vodafone May Have Its Own Facebook Phone
- Intel Says It WILL Command the Respect of ARM
- SilverStone Displays Case Lineup and 1350W PSU
- OCZ RevoDrive Hybrid vs. Intel Z68 SSD Caching
- Corsair's Carbide Cases, Vengeance RAM, SSD
- Intel is Stepping on the Gas for Atom CPU Plans
- Seasonic's New Power Supply Lineup for Sept.
- InWin Gives Us a Peek at Its Prototype Cases
- Tom's Advocate: Got A Manufacturer Grievance?
- HTC ChaCha Gets a Processor Upgrade
- Ofcom: 4G Will Interfere with Digital TV
- British Library Launches Amazing Free iPad App
- AMD Reviving FX Brand For High-End Platforms
- Win8 Will Push ARM in 40% of Netbooks By 2015
- Dungeon Siege 3 Demo Launched on Steam
- Mass Effect 3, Far Cry 3 Dated for 2012
- It's A Fanless Cooler for your 2.5" Drive





I don't buy into turbo boost.
Right now Intel is far ahead with its 2500k, even in price-performance ratio. Remains to be seen what Zambezi can pit againt it. Quite interesting, since I'm about to upgrade.
This seems like a normal development. We've had the die shrinkages and more cores and now we're back to clock increases.
This seems like a normal development. We've had the die shrinkages and more cores and now we're back to clock increases.
A good tginh, if you ask me. Core count inreases require developers to catch up with it, which they usually don't (a lot of new games coming out don't use even four cores, not to speak of six or eight, makeing them useless. (wohoo - I can unrar files using eight cores - the investemnt paid off!!111!!))
Clock increases just make the CPU do stuff faster. No other condidtions applied. Great.
Nah. That's a 3,6 GHz CPU.
Please refrain from click-fishing with sensational headlines in the future.
Hurts the credibility of the site for short term benefits.
Since Xeon-class CPU's are typically aimed at server and workstations markets, I fail to see the practical benefits of running just one core at 4.0 GHz. This in itself does not create a useful let alone niche, product. However the overall multi-threaded performance of this architecture (4 cores + 4 threading units), seems quite good even at stock speed.
I wouldn't be surprised to see faster models (one's considerably more expensive). In the coming weeks AMD's performance and pricing could well give the Xeon some stiff competition
Intel® Xeon E3-1290 Specs:
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon [...] 71705.html
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology 2.0:
http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost/index.htm
http://ark.intel.com/MySearch.aspx [...] y%20Bridge
The first dual-core processors, which were available up to 3.6 GHz (Pentium D 900 series), consumed as much as 130 watts.-Lol I got mine running at 3.75+ seen someone running it above 4.2 wc
I had my Core i7 920 at 4.0Ghz, tower-cooled with air almost since the day I got it with no voltage increase and without a single problem...
I'll never understand why Intel chose to market these the way they did...
Proving very difficult to replace, nowadays at 4.5Ghz with an off the shelf water cooler. There's ain't much that is quicker out there and certainly not for less than £200 (including cooling.)
I also don't buy into turbo boost. This is not a 4GHz CPU!
What's the difference between this "breakthrough" 4.0 and everyone's 4.5 2500Ks? What makes this a big deal?