Applications
Applications
Ad
In our application testing, we can see that the Opteron takes second place in all our tests, yet its results are more skewed towards the Xeon 5080. In the first two tests the Xeon 5160 is 16-22% faster than the Opteron. The Winrar compression time was a direct result of the Single Cycle SSE of the Woodcrest processor.
- Previous page Benchmark Results
- Next page Synthetics
Ad
Google Ads
Ad
The CPU Articles and reviews
- Green Machine: AMD Dual-Core Platform at 54W
- AMD's Dual Core Laptops Have Arrived: Introducing the Turion 64 X2
- THG Tuning Test: Core 2 Extreme vs. Athlon 64 FX-62
- Game Over? Core 2 Duo Knocks Out Athlon 64
- Xeon Woodcrest Preys On Opteron
- First Benchmarks: Conroe vs. FX-62
- AM2: AMD Reinvents Itself
- A 4.1 GHz Dual Core at £79.95 - Can it be True?
- Dual Core Intel Processors For Low-Power, High-Performance Desktops
- Spring 2006 Interactive CPU Charts Update
News
- Woodcrest outperforms Opteron in speed and power consumption - analyst
- Intel Woodcrest server leads AMD Opteron 64 server in performance test
- Caneland and Tigerton, Intel preps for battle against AMD’s 4P Opteron
- AMD launches Opteron 185, 285 and 885 processors
- Intel releases Woodcrest benchmark results, claims series of records
Reviews
Related Content
