Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

ASRock P45TS-R

by

Just as the formerly-introduced P45R2000-WiFi attempts to bring high-end features to the mainstream market, ASRock’s P45TS-R attempts to bring mainstream features to the low-cost market. Though it’s yet to be seen in discount Web stores, an estimated web price of around $120 brings buyers such niceties as IEEE-1394 FireWire, onboard digital audio outputs, enough analog jacks to support 7.1 surround without sacrificing microphone or line level inputs, and the reliability benefit of solid capacitors in all locations.

Like its better-featured brother, the P45TS-R targets the widest number of possible buyers by supporting the builder’s choice of DDR2 or DDR3 modules, but focuses primarily on DDR2 with four slots for the older style memory. Cost efficiency is seen in the simple chipset sinks where anything more elaborate is not normally required, while a four-phase voltage regulator reminds everyone that this really is a low-cost part.

The P45TS-R doesn’t include a second x16 slot to share the sixteen PCI Express 2.0 pathways in Crossfire mode, but it also doesn’t suffer the inconvenience of a selector card between the slots. One of three x1 slots is found in the same location as the more elaborate motherboard’s second graphics slot, and users can add an x1 card to any or all of these without sacrificing pathways to the x16 slot.

As with the P45R2000-WiFi, ASRock has economized the P45TS-R slightly by putting connectors in odd locations to facilitate a simplified circuit design. The rear-panel eSATA port for example isn’t connected to anything, as ASRock expects builders to run a cable internally from the orange connector on the bottom-front corner to the likewise connector on the top-rear corner. Also, the 24-pin ATX/EPS main power connector is located on the “wrong side” of the chipset/RAM, forcing builders to rout this cable in an “ugly” way that could hinder airflow. And just when we thought the bottom-rear corner was the worst possible place to put a front-panel audio header, ASRock proved us wrong by moving theirs up by only around an inch, making it too high to reach from the bottom and too low to reach from the top.

With all the layout complaints, one might make the mistake that we didn’t like the P45TS-R, which is far from true. But rather than reveal any test data too early in this article, we can point to good layout traits like the Ultra ATA connector at the front edge above the motherboard’s center line for easy reach to upper-bay devices, and the six Serial ATA connectors that face outward rather than upward to ease placement in tight cases.

Of course the Serial ATA connectors will get in the way of full-length PCI cards, but we find it extremely unlikely that anyone considering this value-performance part will use it with server components.

Six USB 2.0 ports are available internally to connect front-panel devices, but two of these are found on a WiFi mini-card header between the third PCI Express x1 and top PCI slot.

XP users who wish to add AHCI or RAID mode to their installation will be disappointed to find the floppy header beneath the P45TS-R’s lowest PCI slot, but ASRock probably had Vista users in mind with this layout.

Share:
6
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
alex_oneill2006 25/08/2008 13:23
Hide
-0+

Wait, i think i missed the conclusion... what was the conclusion.....or am i just silly !?

Great review any who, i have been waiting for one of these. I would say go for the P5Q Deluxe!!!!!!!!11

iluvgillgill 25/08/2008 14:30
Hide
-0+

the old E6xx CPU is not good enough to explore the FSB of the new P45 chipset. i seen better review then this in term of hardware. there should be at least a dual core 45nm processor and a 45nm quad processor.

sigh....tom's been lazy with hardware update!

spuddyt 25/08/2008 17:40
Hide
-0+

I assume it is a mistake that says the P45 platinum from MSI has an X48 chipset?

DangerousD 30/08/2008 21:59
Hide
-0+

so waht about a decent conclusion something like, are these boarfds worth the extra cash over a P35 chipset variant, everything tells me they offer little incentive over the P35, thoughts anyone?

Henrlk 07/09/2008 01:44
Hide
-0+

Hello?
Uhm .. 45nm!?

I agree, test with a better (new) CPU(s) 45nm Dual/Quad.
That would be really interesting. This probably means alot to someone that owns the E6xx series CPU which i doubt someone buy if they buy a P45 board.

Anonymous 03/01/2009 01:47
Hide
-0+

Methinks Tom has a bit of biassed attitude favouring Asus tbh

Best offers

Newsletters


OK