05:01 - Monday 29 October 2007 by Bert Töpelt
Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: intel, core2, penryn
Categories: Hardware
Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: intel, core2, penryn
Categories: Hardware
Table of content:
The Processor – Intel Core 2 QX9650
Ad
Intel’s new quad-core processor still consists of two dual-core processors combined in one CPU package. Penryn is actually the codename for the dual-core version, while the quad-core version is called Yorkfield.

The following table highlights the differences between the old and the new technology by comparing current quad-core models.
| Penryn QX9650 | Conroe QX6850 | |
| Clock Speed | 3.00 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| FSB | 333 MHz | 333 MHz |
| Cache | 2x 6 MB | 2x 4 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Transistors | 820 Mio. | 586 Mio. |
| Die-Area | 214 mm² | 286 mm² |
| TDP | 130 W | 130 W |
This is the CPU we used for all of our benchmarks and tests.
The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 that we received from Intel uses the C0 stepping.

While CPU-Z was unable to identify the stepping, Everest had no such problems.

- Previous page 12 MB L2 Cache and SSE 4
- Next page Overclocking I – 3.33 GHz
Google Ads
The CPU Articles and reviews
- Is Cache Size Really The Key To Boosting Performance?
- Budget Overclocker - AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition
- Parallel Processing, Part 1: CPU Cores
- Keeping Your CPU Going If Your Cooler Fails
- [IDF]Centrino 5 Explored
- AMD K10: The Architecture of the Revival?
- Feeling the Squeeze: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6400 Black Edition
- Can CPUs (Finally) Make PCs Faster as Well as Quieter?
- Overclocking to new limits: Testing the new Core 2 Stepping
- Do More Cores Beat More Clock Speed?





i still going to get an AMD64 5000+ Black edition as my server needs an new cpu, mobo and ram
i do not want to replace my motherboard just yet as it performs Fully stable for me and i not looked into stable/good OC boards for Intel yet
but darn that CPU has some power behind it lol
Thanks guys!!
Bob
PS Like the detail on the new SSE4.1 instructions + history of SSE instructions - nice touch!!
P.S. With liquid nitrogen I'd like to see how well it performs TOO!! [of course a more simple solutions like a watercooling overcloking still is a good thing, especially if it's in a video to see exactly what is going on]
If we're already seeing 3.6GHz+ air cooled on Q6600's @ 65nm then another 20% hike in speed should be pushing it to 4.2GHz easily.
The scary thing for all should be what the hell happens when Intel take away AMD's only defense in the way of adding a memory controller to the die. Low latency access with a shared L2 and ridiculously scalable frequency leaves AMD looking a rather poor second choice.
With Intel sandbaging already and enjoying healthy margin that is only going to be worse for AMD later on.
I understand that you want to achieve the best results possible and therefore chose the best performing processor for the job. However, this particular processor is the only one available with an un-locked multiplier. The majority of users don't have this luxury and only have an option to increase the FSB if they want to overclock their system. This sort of makes the test you've performed redundant for the majority.
A much better processor to test would have been the Q9550. While it's eventual clock speed wont match that of the QX9650, percentage wise it should be near as damn identical.
Otherwise, great article :-)
Whilst the article makes for very interesting reading why did TH choose to test the QX9650 CPU? This is one of the most expensive processors on the market today and well beyond the reach of all but the most well off users.... Blah Blah
Wakey, wakey idiot... This thread is months old and thats all that was out at the time...
Bob