Intel Releases Anti-Nvidia Ion Documents
Those who have been keeping a close eye on the Ion (geddit, eye-on the… oh nevermind), will know that there’s been a small feud brewing between Nvidia and Intel.
Intel is vehemently intent on keeping its Atom processor paired within its own chipset technologies. While there’s no argument that the Atom is very good at what it does -- being miserly on power requirements -- there are many of the opinion that the chipset and GPU that the Atom sits on could be better. Nvidia is one of such opinion, and is pushing its Ion platform as the solution.
We’ve been hearing for months now that Intel isn’t welcoming of the help, placing certain restrictions on OEMs and even Nvidia regarding the use of the Atom processor. Websites bit-tech and Fudzilla now claim to have seen a document from Intel, titled the Nvidia Ion Competitive Position Guide, that aims to dissuade OEMs from selecting the Ion platform.
Intel’s first jab against the Ion is that it’s based off of older Nvidia technologies, calling it “a SKU of the existing MCP79M/MCP7A chipset family (branded in part as GeForce 9400M, GeForce 9400, GeForce 9300, GeForce 9100M G or GeForce 8200M G.” While this is true, one complaint about nearly all the Atom systems available today use the 945GSE chipset.
Intel also said that Nvidia is “attempting to re-use an integrated graphics chipset designed for the notebook and desktop system price points into the netbook and nettop system price points. This in turn leads to higher costs as well as high power consumption.” The document compares the Atom’s current TDP of 8 W against Ion’s 15.5 W.
Of course, those who want the added multimedia capabilities afforded by the Nvidia chipset might be willing to pay a little bit more and live with a reduced battery life. Intel doesn’t believe that market is significant, as it adds, “neither gaming nor video transcoding are relevant to netbook and nettop users,” later concluding, “Don’t buy the hype around Nvidia Ion--it offers no advantages that an Intel platform cannot provide relevant to the Netbook and Nettop market segments.”
Intel does point out that the Nvidia’s “window” to push the Ion is limited too, as the Atom will be gaining an on-die IGP when Pineview hits late 2009.
- Steve Jobs to Skip Apple Shareholder Meeting
- MSI Unveils X-Slim; Goes After MacBook Air
- Inno3D's GeForce GTX 260 with FreezerX2
- Microsoft Says Stolen Phone Rendered Useless
- Antitrust Chief: Google is a Monopolist Threat
- Are 8.9-inch Netbooks on Their Way Out?
- Dell Mini 10 Stuck With 1 GB RAM
- Mozilla Says iPhone Jailbreaking is Legal
- Music Industry Wants BitTorrent Blackout
- PC Gaming Roundup - February 23, 2009
- First Ever GeForce GTX 285 2 GB Card
- PC Gaming Roundup - February 24, 2008
- VMWare Says Microsoft, Google Clouds No Good
- Gmailers Hit by "Major" Outage
- Gtalk Users Hit by Phishing Scam
- Ballmer: No Microsoft Phone, But WinMo 7 Coming
- Intel Also Wants to Set "Netbook" Free
- Picture: Microsoft's Resident Evil 5 Red Xbox 360





So NVIDIA will go VIA then instead of Atom.
Intel, you're obviously worried about this otherwise you wouldn't be complaining about it, trying to dissuade OEMs from going with Ion.
And if semi-intensive multimedia/visual capabilities aren't the netbook's remit then why are ALL netbook manufacturers ditching 8.9inch screens? Why do HP want to produce an Atom-powered 13.3 inch unit (hardly a netbook any more) and what do you think the "nettop" and Apple TV are all about?
What about HTPCs running Atom/Ion?
And why are you bothering to bolt a new graphics core into the Atom?
I love the fact that both of their arguements are positions in which their chipsets are even weaker ie. age and power consumption!
Fully agree - Intel is just greedy and lazy on this one... First they've put an old crappy chipset next to Atom, Atom itself uses Pentium 4 technology (or was it Pentium D?) stripped out as much as possible... but wasn't designed from grounds up to be a fully mobile platform - new Atoms - same thing as with the first dual cores - instead of optimizing the internals of the die they just added another cpu to it... Not to mention their Lebaree platform (probably misstyped it) So, "dear" Intel... Everybody is way ahead of you, and you are just pulling the industry back with your silly improvements in current CPUs and by suing the competition?
Gods... Where are the good old days where the benchmarks dictated the route CPU manufacturers followed?