Conclusions

So what are current integrated platforms good for? The same they have always been good for: putting a 2D image on your screen. For 3D gaming, neither the Intel X3000 nor the ATI Radeon X1250 was able to deliver something "worthwhile" that even entry-level gamers would enjoy. Adding an inexpensive card upped the ante on gaming performance but still lacked what makes PC gaming great: big graphics and really feeling the game play. If you have a limited budget, the MSI NX8500GT was the better card in this comparison. However, the gamer in me tells you to save a few more pennies and go for a better card for gaming. The Radeon X1950 Pro is still a nice card for gaming and if you double down you can get a GeForce 8600GTS.
On the other side, the integrated chipsets did alright for standard DVD playback. They had issues with noise reduction in broadcast and mixed formatted content but overall it was no worse than some home systems I have watched. HTPCs still deliver all-in-one applications for recording, playback and storage of content, and can be used for other purposes. If you wanted an HD DVD playback system from a motherboard, the Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H with AMD’s latest version of 690G and Radeon X1250 can handle it. Based on the tests we ran on the integrated and the discrete graphics processors, you ended up with almost the same performance. For the money, you get the same performance in DVD and HD DVD playback without the extra money for a stand-alone piece of graphics hardware.
Author’s Opinions
Personally I am still waiting for discrete graphics hardware to develop video content playback. There is so much computational horsepower in the shader core alone but it takes the right programming to make it work well. It looks like the same processing techniques hindered the integrated and discrete processors from AMD/ATI. In my own opinion, the Nvidia scenes shown on the 8500GT just looked blurry and some of the text seemed to skip a beat. All three companies have come a long way with video playback as well as integrated graphics hardware but they still have a long way to go. Perhaps this is what Fusion and the next round of chipsets will provide. One can only hope.
- Previous page Video Playback: High-Definition DVD
- ATI's Radeon 2600 XT Remixed
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for your Money: A September 2007 Guide
- The Revolution Will Not be Televised - HD Video on PC
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money UK: August 2007
- Leadtek's GeForce 8800 Performance Leviathan
- HD 2600 & GeForce 8600: Where's the Mid-Range?
- San Base: Computer Graphics Avant-Garde
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: July 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: June 2007
- Alienware Auroara 7500 vs Gateway FX530XG
- HP Pavilion a810n Upgrade questions
- Is this computer good for Playing BF2, HL2, and FEAR?
- What can this do?
- video memory - which option?
- Help with building a linux machine
- What is the best place to order a custom built gaming pc?????
- Cheapest Mac Laptop that can still play Windows Games
- slow PC sales