IDF 2008: WiMAX and the Future of Wireless
IDF is just much about following through on new technology as it is about introducing it for the first time. WiMAX has been in the works for several years, and Intel seems extremely confident that it is the definite future of worldwide wireless.
Tolis Papathanassiou, Intel’s Principal Wireless Architect, hosted a class on the expected performance of WiMAX as well as its future through 2011. First, Tolis wanted to outline what Intel’s goal was as far as making WiMAX a reality.
“[We want] to bring transparent and affordable Internet access wherever you are,” said Tolis. “So the WiFi and the WiMAX together are what we see as the mobile broadband for the future.”
Tolis then went in-depth about the wireless standards as well as the speeds associated with them. As of right now, Intel has a three year deployment plan for WiMAX which has already started in several cities, like Portland, Ann Arbor and Baltimore. This upcoming WiMAX will operate on the 802.16e Rel 1.0 standard, and will theoretically have downlink speed of over 46 Mbps and a 14 Mbps uplink.
With these numbers already a little astounding, Intel already has plans for 802.16e 1.5, which will more than double both the downlink and uplink. Finally, even further down the road (2010-2011), Intel will release WiMAX 2.0, which (again, theoretically) will have a 300+ Mbps downlink and 100+ Mbps uplink.
When compared to current maximum EVDO speeds of 14.7 Mbps down and 5.4 Mbps up, WiMAX looks to help the Internet go HD on a global scale.
- Heatsink Maker Jumps Into LED Lighting Biz
- IDF 2008: Intel Imagines Wireless Power For Your Laptop
- IDF 2008: New SATA Standard Expands To 600 MB/s, Enables Next Phase For SSD Performance
- Battery Cell Shortage Still Looming
- IDF 2008: "SuperSpeed" USB 3.0 Demoed At IDF
- Steve Wozniak: An Engineer's Engineer
- IDF: Intel and Yahoo Team Up to Offer Internet on Television
- One Electron At A Time: Scientists Close In On Quantum Computing
- On Electron At A Time: Scientists Close In On Quantum Computing
- Shuttle's Stylish New X27 Makes an Appearance
- Intel Will Disclose DTS Specs At IDF
- Top 10 Celebrities For Microsoft's Windows Vista Campaign
- New Sony DJ System Now In Love With Apple's IPods
- 5 Million iPhone 3Gs And 3 Million Macs This Quarter, Analysts Estimate
- Nvidia CUDA 2.0 Delivers Photoshop Plug-in Acceleration
- AT&T Launches ConnecTech to Rival Geek Squad
- Polish Carrier Embellishes iPhone Queues With Actors
- Microsoft's Photosynth Crashes on Day 1
I've had land based wireless internet in a farmhouse for 4 years. The signal comes from a 500 foot tower about 15 miles away to a directional roof top antenna on the house. It works just fine.
What's new about "wimax"? Why should we have to read press releases for years about something that is nowhere to be seen?
Potential speed is meaningless unless the service provider allows that speed to subscribers for an affordable price.
Please report on how wimax is so different from land based wireless that is already in service.
(When wimax was first announced there was talk of an unlicensed version that might be a non-line-of-sight alternative to Wifi. Now THAT's interesting. What became of that?)