Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

FAST! IBM Develops 100GHz Transistor Device

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

This could one day replace silicon to give us... LUDICROUS SPEED!

While the flat out GigaHertz race is no longer a priority, we all still get impressed at high clock frequencies. IBM researchers have demonstrated a radio-frequency graphene transistor with the highest cut-off frequency achieved so far for any graphene device - 100 GHz.

"A key advantage of graphene lies in the very high speeds in which electrons propagate, which is essential for achieving high-speed, high-performance next generation transistors," said Dr. T.C. Chen, vice president, Science and Technology, IBM Research. "The breakthrough we are announcing demonstrates clearly that graphene can be utilized to produce high performance devices and integrated circuits."

Here is the deal on the graphene from IBM:

Graphene is a single atom-thick layer of carbon atoms bonded in a hexagonal honeycomb-like arrangement. This two-dimensional form of carbon has unique electrical, optical, mechanical and thermal properties and its technological applications are being explored intensely.

Uniform and high-quality graphene wafers were synthesized by thermal decomposition of a silicon carbide (SiC) substrate. The graphene transistor itself utilized a metal top-gate architecture and a novel gate insulator stack involving a polymer and a high dielectric constant oxide. The gate length was modest, 240 nanometers, leaving plenty of space for further optimization of its performance by scaling down the gate length.

It is noteworthy that the frequency performance of the graphene device already exceeds the cut-off frequency of state-of-the-art silicon transistors of the same gate length (~ 40 GigaHertz). Similar performance was obtained from devices based on graphene obtained from natural graphite, proving that high performance can be obtained from graphene of different origins. Previously, the team had demonstrated graphene transistors with a cut-off frequency of 26 GigaHertz using graphene flakes extracted from natural graphite.

Share:
11
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
Anonymous 08/02/2010 23:22
Hide
--2+

Soooooo, i wonder how that will overclock?

paxiam 09/02/2010 05:15
Hide
--2+

I would much pre

paxiam 09/02/2010 05:17
Hide
-1+

I would much prefer a high performance single threaded cpu than a multi core architecture. This is definitely a step in the right direction.

mi1ez 09/02/2010 10:14
Hide
-0+

You need a combination of speed and structure. A single core-single threaded CPU won't cut it. I will admit however that beyond quad core isn't needed by the vast majority of mainstream consumers.

kobbra 09/02/2010 10:19
Hide
-1+

I bet that this can play crysis all of its own!!!

mi1ez 09/02/2010 11:43
Hide
-4+

kobbra wrote :

I bet that this can play crysis all of its own!!!



*facepalm*

Anonymous 09/02/2010 12:51
Hide
-0+

While the flat out GigaHertz race is no longer a priority, we all still get impressed at high clock frequencies. IBM researchers have demonstrated a radio-frequency graphene transistor with the highest cut-off frequency achieved so far for any graphene device - 100 GHz.

typo

pyrrhon 09/02/2010 17:10
Hide
-0+

IBM had cell processor and now this. Bright future!

core i7 ownage 09/02/2010 17:54
Hide
--1+

paxiam :
I would much prefer a high performance single threaded cpu than a multi core architecture. This is definitely a step in the right direction.


YES!

Anonymous 19/02/2010 12:24
Hide
-0+

Quote :I would much prefer a high performance single threaded cpu than a multi core architecture. This is definitely a step in the right direction.


And me, I would much prefer a high performance multi core architecture, because 4x100 ghz is always better than 1x100 gherz...

core i7 ownage 19/02/2010 12:25
Hide
-0+

daftsystem :
And me, I would much prefer a high performance multi core architecture, because 4x100 ghz is always better than 1x100 gherz...


No, Paxiam meant he prefers a single CPU running at 800GHZ than with CPU with 8 cores running at 100GHZ.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK