Source: THG – Keywords: hyperdrive4, ssd
Categories: Hardware
The HyperDrive 4 By HyperOS

Now let’s get into the new HyperDrive 4. The first thing we noticed when we browsed the manufacturer’s website is the tremendous amount of information, which is not typical for storage devices - most companies provide a specification sheet and a lot of marketing-heavy data. That’s also the case on http://www.hyperossystems.co.uk/, but everything is backed with benchmark data and information that I can only call hands-on experience, which is indeed useful to get a feeling for the HyperDrive. Although our benchmark results make very clear that this indeed is one of the fastest hard drive replacements we’ve seen, the numbers do not tell the whole story. The HyperDrive is an invention of Pascal Bancsi, who partnered with the Britsh company called HyperOS, from which we received the test samples. The root website for this product hence is http://www.acceleratedlogic.com/.
The layout of the HyperDrive 4 is similar to that of the HyperDrive III: it is still a 5.25" unit that accepts up to eight DDR1 ECC DIMMs, and it still installs easily into any available drive bay. HyperOS added two 40 mm fans at the front of the drive, which are used to properly cool the device. We did not notice it getting really hot, but there is certainly nothing wrong with being careful. Unfortunately, the fans are more than noticeable, and will override your efforts to create a quiet system. While the HyperDrive 4 clearly targets the professional market and extreme enthusiasts, a solid state drive would obviously seem to be ideal for service in a no-noise environment. At least HyperOS mentions on the website that the next generation might be entirely quiet...
On the back side you will find a Molex connector, which the drive uses to get its power, and an UltraATA connector and a SATA port. Unlike the HyperDrive III, which was UltraATA/100, the fourth generation utilizes UltraATA/133. The SATA port is also limited to the theoretical maximum of 133 MB/s. It’s a pity that it still doesn’t support native SATA, but we understand that the step from UltraATA/100 to 133 was easier and just as effective as going to SATA/150. A new HyperDrive with support for SATA/300 is in the works, and scheduled to launch in the first half of 2008.
It was very interesting to watch the SYSmark 2007 Preview results, because this application benchmark, which simulates popular applications, benefits considerably if the operating system and the benchmark are installed onto the HyperDrive 4. Clearly, the benchmark reflects that all the latencies we have to accept with conventional hard drives and even with Flash SSDs (write latency) are gone with the HyperDrive 4.
The only real drawback of the HyperDrive 4 seems to be its price: The bare product is currently priced at £1,195 / €1,700. Typical users can almost buy a standard desktop PC and a notebook for that amount of money. If you want the version with up to 32 GB of memory, you’ll have to fork out 50% more - and you still have to buy the memory! You can either buy DDR ECC memory at the retailer of your choice, or look at the HyperOS offerings: Eight 1 GB DIMMs cost £375 / €535, or you can go for eight 2 GB DIMMs for £995 / €1,420. The 32 GB memory package is a whopping five times more expensive! You might also want to add some money for the backup hard drive or Flash SDD, which is fairly cheap in contrast to the HyperDrive 4 and the memory.
HyperOS also offers a plethora of accessories, such as external eSATA models, drive cabinets and even bundles of multiple HyperDrives with memory and RAID controllers. The sky is the limit. We also want to make clear that HyperOS might not have much of an influence on memory cost. From this standpoint, we recommend switching to DDR2 memory, as this technology currently is cheaper than DDR1, even if ECC is required.
In the end, the HyperDrive 4 still left an excellent impression, as it works like any other hard drive and doesn’t require drivers or any complicated installation, and its performance is stellar - both in terms of benchmark numbers and the subjective impression we got from using it.


There are two 40 mm fans in the front.


The HyperDrive 4 comes with a massive battery unit (on the left with blue color), a charger and all necessary cables.
- Previous page Hard Drives, Flash Drives, RAM Drives
- Next page Inside The HyperDrive 4
- The Terabyte Battle Continues: Enter Seagate
- 6 Bare Metal Backup and Recovery Options
- Parallel Processing, Part 2: RAM and HDD
- WD Caviar GP: The Green 1 TB Drive
- SAS Hard Drives: 15,000 vs. 10,000 RPM
- Flash-Based Hard Drives Are Here
- Unified Serial RAID Controllers for PCI Express
- RAID Scaling Charts, Part 2
- Enthusiast 2.5-inch HDDs: Speed or Capacity?
- Should You Care About Hybrid Hard Drives?
I'm surprised the RAID controller doesn't get itself all in a twist bating along at those speeds!
Great article THG
But... I have been monitoring the progress of the Hyperdrives (or not!!) over the past few years... The Hyperdrive IV (long awaited) has been around for months... So why have THG taken so long to produce this article???
We get subjected to latest GPU wars (which never show MINIMUM framerates) or Intel CPU... Thats great when they introduce something new (Netburst->Centrino->Core) but otherwise is pretty dull... Time to put the innovation back in THG!!
As for the Hyperdrive IV its a crock of **** because HyperOS Systems _still_ have not sorted out a SATA-300 link for it!! Mind you at least it is no longer vapour-ware (like it was for 2-3 years of development post product announcment)... An SDRAM base Hyperdrive V (?) should saturate a 3Gbit link and only then will you totally kick the butt of any other drive on the planet!! The benchmarks results would change radically then!!
Ah looking forward to 2008!! Donations to the "Bob Build a Server Fund" gratefully received :-)
Bob
Well forget all this and look over here:
http://www.fusionio.com/
They have FAR more bang for your buck.
It will be expensive in the beginning (everything is in IT). Once this filters through to the normal user it will DESTROY anything that SATAII can throw at it. 100,000 io/s, the benchmarks speak for themselves.
doa_cp:
OK the price may be good but the life span isn't. The Hyperdrive will last a lot longer (with decent ECC RAM). Also I would rather have a generic SATA-2 interface than suffer the driver headaches of a PCIe interface. Could you ever install an OS on one - I doubt it!! (Especially Windows of course!!)
I am interested in the performance for RAID-0 cheap CF cards with SATA adapters hanging off a good RAID card with 256Mb+ of cache ram. 8x CF 8Gb cards could have interesting performance numbers!!
Also the individual CF cards could be replaced as they wear out and the investment in CF IDE-SATA adapters and Hardware RAID card amortilised over time... Still waiting, waiting, waiting for THG to pull their collective fingers out and do a decent article on this subject (and not the pansy assed one that came out this year).
Bob
BobWya,
what do you mean the life span is not very long? Its more than a hard drive, and just as good as a CF card.
I would think that drier support would be extremely good, it is aimed at the server market, but if they want windows sales then 2003 and XP are (almost) identical so drivers would not be a problem.
You are right about OS installation though, that is until mainbaords accept PCIe as a boot device (could wait a LONG time for that).
I don't know that I'd want to install an OS on it though, especially windows (think pagefiles!!).
I reckon that it will kick ass as a database/webserver storage solution, maybe just a bridge too far for "normal" pc users.
doa_cp
I guess just losing storage slowely ain't so bad (through wear leveling). I got a new Seagate HD in the Summer and last month one of the heads started aqua-planning on the harddisk. So you're right when you think of HD lifespans...
However I was pitting your PCIe drive against a bank of RAID-0 CF cards or a Hyperdrive V (?? - SATA-1 interface is a waste of money) Now the later may be expensive but it should last a longtime (SDRAM lifetime)!!
Bob