Conclusion
The Zotac GeForce GTX 285 Infinity Edition uses a lot of memory and moderate GPU overclocks to achieve notable performance gains compared to reference-spec cards. But the solution is most certain to grab the attention of performance fanatics who would have otherwise considered an overclocked GeForce GTX 285 and separate liquid-cooling water block.
Here's the rub: the card hasn't shown up yet at e-tail. As the availability story changes, we'll update this space to reflect Zotac's value-proposition for the enthusiasts looking to stack two or three of these in a high-performance SLI configuration, where heat is public enemy number one.
Initial estimates from Zotac peg the card around $519. Stock GeForce GTX 285s go for somewhere around $360 online. And the Danger Den water block sells for $145. In other words, buying pre-configured from Zotac will cost close to the sum of its parts, netting you a guaranteed overclock and two-year warranty (that's upgraded to "lifetime" coverage if you register the card immediately after purchasing it).
Our biggest reservation in outright recommending it over the competing model out there with an identical cooler is that the competition provides its card with a single-slot bracket. While we won't directly compare the two, since we don't have that other board on hand to test thermals, power, or performance, its single-slot mounting could open up three additional expansion slots when used in a 3-way SLI configuration. Zotac offers superior clock speeds, but buyers must weigh that advantage against any lost slot access.
Our previous 3-way SLI articles have shown good reasons to choose liquid cooling when multiple cards are installed back-to-front, but it’s up to the buyer to decide which liquid cooled solution is best for his or her needs.
Latest Graphics Cards News
- 20/05 – Qualcomm Hires Former AMD CTO Demers
- 18/05 – Nvidia Responds to GeForce 600 Series V-Sync Stuttering Issue
- 18/05 – Behold: Here Are The First Unreal Engine 4 Screens
- 17/05 – Nvidia Debuts GK110-based 7.1 Billion Transistor Super GPU
- 17/05 – GE Announces Kepler Graphics Card for Military and Aviation
Latest Graphics Cards reviews
- 18/05 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – Best Graphics Cards For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – GeForce GTX 670 2 GB Review: Is It Already Time To Forget GTX...
- 09/05 – Video Teaser: Radeon HD 7800 Series Remains A Solid Value
- 08/05 – Benchmarking AMD's 768-Shader Pitcairn: Not For Public...
Uhmm another THG fail...
The first page was great then it descended into this usual pointless benchmarks. Comparing apples and oranges again.
What is this article about?? Not a whole lot really. Certainly not how to watercool if the GPU temperatures are a guide... Your temperature delta is way to high. The loop is clearly both too restrictive (due to the stupid linking of the GPUs blocks in series) and also does not have a good enough radiator to dissipate all the (load) GPU heat. Even a single Feser quad rad. would have trouble with a tri-GTX 285 GPU water loop!!
The article fails because it makes watercooling look second rate comapared to good aircooling. Which of course will happen if a waterloop is poorly laid out and uses restrictive parts/inadaquate radiators (wattage heat dissipation).
The article also fails because it does really look closely enough at the real benefit of watercooling which is near silence (who cares about 1-2FPS)!! Some recordings of the system noise of the 3 systems would have made a nice change!!
Bob
good point
I din't get the part where where they OC'd the i7 to 3.2 with the bclk at 200..mine is Oc'd to 3.3 and the bclk is 160. At 200=4.0ghz. But as for the article, it was a waste of time. I though water cooling would be very significant opposed to air cooled.. I am dissapointed..
The article fails because it makes watercooling look second rate comapared to good aircooling. Which of course will happen if a waterloop is poorly laid out and uses restrictive parts/inadaquate radiators (wattage heat dissipation