Best Graphics Cards For The Money: October 2010
Table of contents
- 1. October Updates
- 2. Best PCIe Card: $90 And Under
- 3. Best PCIe Card: $100 To $150
Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.
So, if you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right card, then fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming cards offered for the money.
October Updates:
Competition is driving prices down like mad. And as a result, we're seeing value like never before. The GeForce GTX 460 768 MB and Radeon HD 5830 are bringing their battle below $200, all the way down to $175. The GeForce GTX 470 at just under $300 has pushed the Radeon HD 5850 down to $260. Even the Radeon HD 5970 can be found for $600 or even less, delivering a good price/performance value for the first time in the product's existence.
It's very good to see Nvidia commit to competitive pricing after such a long wait for the GeForce GTX 400-series' introduction, and there's little doubt whether or not there is a battle going on now. We're at a loss to understand why the strategy has changed so suddenly, but we're sure glad it did. With the introduction of the new GeForce GTS 450, Nvidia has strong competition from $100 and up--with the exception of a direct answer to the Radeon HD 5770. The sub-$100 market seems to be a relatively weak suit for GeForce competition, but the price margins between products here is so slim that its difficult to crown solid winners and a $10 difference can make or break a recommendation. The GeForce 9800 GT and GT 240 could do the job if the prices were a little lower, but perhaps the company has decided the slim margins aren't worth a vicious fight in this space.
As Nvidia fills the ranks with more Fermi-based cards, we can't help but recall Dirk Meyer's previous statement in AMD's Q2'10 earnings call, claiming, "We remain on track to bolster our GPU leadership with the introduction of our second-generation DX11 graphics products later this year." If the next-generation Radeons are coming, we would expect them to arrive in ample time for the holiday season. But while rumors abound, there has been no official word from the company exactly when these next gen products will be released. We anticipate that the upcoming Radeon cards will likely be a speed bump that heavily leverages existing Radeon HD 5000-series architecture, but we won't know anything for sure until the company provides information not under embargo (Ed.: *wink wink*).
Some Notes About Our Recommendations
A few simple guidelines to keep in mind when reading this list:
- This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the cards on this list are more expensive than what you really need. We've added a reference page at the end of the column covering integrated graphics processors, which is likely more apropos.
- The criteria to get on this list are strictly price/performance. We acknowledge that recommendations for multiple video cards, such as two Radeon cards in CrossFire mode or two GeForce cards in SLI, typically require a motherboard that supports CrossFire or SLI and a chassis with more space to install multiple graphics cards. They also require a beefier power supply compared to what a single card needs, and will almost certainly produce more heat than a single card. Keep these factors in mind when making your purchasing decision. In most cases, if we have recommended a multiple-card solution, we try to recommend a single-card honorable mention at a comparable price point for those who find multi-card setups undesirable.
- Prices and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t base our decisions on always-changing pricing information, but we can list some good cards that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest, along with real-time prices from our PriceGrabber engine, for your reference.
- The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary.
- These are new card prices. No used or open-box cards are in the list; they might represent a good deal, but it’s outside the scope of what we’re trying to do.
Latest Graphics Cards News
- 20/05 – Qualcomm Hires Former AMD CTO Demers
- 18/05 – Nvidia Responds to GeForce 600 Series V-Sync Stuttering Issue
- 18/05 – Behold: Here Are The First Unreal Engine 4 Screens
- 17/05 – Nvidia Debuts GK110-based 7.1 Billion Transistor Super GPU
- 17/05 – GE Announces Kepler Graphics Card for Military and Aviation
Latest Graphics Cards reviews
- 18/05 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – Best Graphics Cards For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – GeForce GTX 670 2 GB Review: Is It Already Time To Forget GTX...
- 09/05 – Video Teaser: Radeon HD 7800 Series Remains A Solid Value
- 08/05 – Benchmarking AMD's 768-Shader Pitcairn: Not For Public...
So nice to see a good mix of Radeon and GeForce in the lists these days, of course November could see the return of the one-sided listings...
But will there ever be a day when integrated graphics are enough to take the entry-level crown?
I'll still never understand why the 4830 is ranked two tiers below the 4850. Sure, it's noticably slower, but slower than the 4770?
Swings and roundabouts.
What would be handy would be if the category winners and honourable mentions were somehow shown as such in the chart. At a glance it's hard to see just where a card falls in the rankings.
I'll still never understand why the 4830 is ranked two tiers below the 4850. Sure, it's noticably slower, but slower than the 4770?Swings and roundabouts.
That strikes me as odd too, but I'm not too concerned about it - after all the 4830 hasn't been around for a long time and never kicked up a lot of dirt during its short lifespan...
That may be true, however with a good cooler, you can overclock the core quite nicely and get 4850 performance easily enough. It's also got the same memory bus as the 4850, which is helpful.
Right now, the ATi Radeon HD 4870 is the best deal because newegg.ca is selling the XFX 1GB and ASUS 1GB models for $134 and $135 respectively. Each of them has a $30 mail-in rebate making them $105+tax and $7.49 shipping. The US site is selling them for about $10 less. To me, there's no better deal than that, especially when one considers that XFX gives their double-lifetime warranty as long as you register your card on their site within 30 days of purchase. That's a bit of a no-brainer.
So nice to see a good mix of Radeon and GeForce in the lists these days, of course November could see the return of the one-sided listings...But will there ever be a day when integrated graphics are enough to take the entry-level crown?
Impossible. You have to consider physics. A single chip on a mobo, even if integrated with fusion technology will never be able to outdo a modern entry-level discrete card because the card has its own RAM instead of using the slower RAM on the mobo. Size matters and no matter how small things get, the card will always have more on it than a small section on the mobo. It's like how a laptop will never outdo a desktop at the same price point because there's more room in a desktop and therefore the manufacture process is less expensive. That's the same with a video card.
Impossible. You have to consider physics. A single chip on a mobo, even if integrated with fusion technology will never be able to outdo a modern entry-level discrete card because the card has its own RAM instead of using the slower RAM on the mobo.
I agree with you totally.
My question was poorly worded: I was wondering if we'll ever see the point where integrated graphics are "good enough" that paying extra for an add-in card only makes sense when gaming at more than entry level. Currently the criteria is biased towards the add-in card (i.e. it assumes you have mobo+CPU and want to spend extra on the graphics), but if you have a fixed amount for mobo+CPU and graphics and only want basic/casual gaming (see later), would we get to the point that integrated graphics and a better CPU are enough to beat entry level add-in card and a much cheaper (=weaker) CPU.
My motivation for this line of thought is planning ahead to replacing my HTPC and where better to spend the money if it's only used for light gaming at 720p resolution...
Though by then I might have a 1080p TV :-)
Why do tomshardware keep reviewing graphics cards for 1920x1200 resolutions? the industry went with 1920x1080 quite a while ago and it makes no sense to keep going testing things at that resolution.
Could you number the rows please? It would make comparing two cards easier (since I loose my place on the page when I do a find!). Thanks.
ATi's new 6850 and 6870 are my 2 picks. Since they are pretty new I will not blame Tom's hardware for not putting them on the list yet. With better performance and $20 dollars less than a 5850, the 6870 should wipe the 5850 off the list next month. The 6850 should wipe out the 5830 and 1GB GTX460. Just my 2 cents Tom already reviewed these cards too so check it out.
I have had a ATi HD69702MB in my system for a while now and just love it don't know how fast it is but it has 2MB of DDR5 and smokes the HD4850's I uesd to have.