AMD Blocks Unlock; Gigabyte Fights Back
While meeting with Gigabyte at Computex, we were let in on a little bit of information regarding AMD's unlock-block for new Phenom II CPUs.
As many already know, it's possible to unlock the disabled cores on recent Phenom II processors, allowing you to get up to 4 cores working. Many who have tried this say that they gain some considerable speed, but there's a risk. The cores are disabled for a reason: they don't work properly. Because of this, AMD will, for example, sell a 4-core processor at 2-cores, for a much cheaper price.
AMD announced that it would release new microcode for motherboard BIOS updates that will disable the core-unlocking feature, preventing people from going to 4-cores if they purchased say a dual-core Phenom II.
The solution is not to upgrade your motherboard's BIOS if you have a board that can unlock cores.
But what if your motherboard maker releases BIOS updates that add or fix features? You would have to choose. Do you want fixes and improvements or do you want to stick with the ability to unlock CPU cores?
Gigabyte says you don't have to on its motherboards with Dual-BIOS technology.
Essentially, Gigabyte said that it will store the old microcode in the secondary BIOS chip, and allow you to do normal BIOS updates on the primary chip. Does this mean that you can't have a backup firmware of your latest BIOS should the first chip corrupt? Gigabyte told us no. The company has upgraded its BIOS chips to be able to store extra information.
The secondary BIOS chip will still backup your BIOS as usual, but have room for the old AMD microcode. When you update your BIOS, your system will boot using the new BIOS code but it will be injected with the old AMD microcode, allowing you to continue to unlock your CPU cores.
Kudos to Gigabyte for this feature.
- gigabyte ,
- motherboard ,
- amd ,
- phenom ,
- cpu
- • Crickets Chirping at Bing Launch
- • Steve Jobs to Attend WWDC 2009
- • 5 Ridiculous Foreign Sci-Fi Remakes
- • IBM to Compete in World Curling Competition
- The Ladies of Computex, Part Four
- Unlocking AMD CPU Cores Safe Say Mobo Makers
- Sony Says Make Restore Discs Yourself
- ECS Shows Atom Mobo With PCI-e x16 Slot
- Windows 7 Build 7201 Leaks Onto P2P Networks
- What Your RAM Goes Through: the Die-hard Tester
- More Pics of SilverStone's Kickass Raven Case
- Intel's 'Larrabee' to Be "Huge"
- Intel Atom-powered Cell Phones by 2011?
- Pirate Party Bags Seats on European Parliament
- Microsoft Shows Official Windows 7 Box Art
- New MacBook Pros are Cheaper, Faster, Pro-er
- Best Buy to Offer Free Windows 7 Upgrades
- Apple Says Safari 4 is World's Fastest Browser
this sucks
Howso? If people are foolish enough to think they're getting a reliable performance upgrade, leave them to it.
AMD may purposedly disable cores on fully working quads, to fill that market need, in theory, those would be the fully stable dual to quad unlocks
AMD may...
That is not for certain, with this microcode update, AMD gets to be no way responsible if any sensitive work is lost. That's the reason in my thinking.
well if you overclock and you lose work are they responsible then, no. I dont see how if you break their warranty by overclocking or disabling cores its their responsibilty.They are doing this becuase they think it will lose them sales of the more expensive triple and quad core processors. I dont blame them for that, they are running a business.
If overclocking voids a warrenty, then why does AMD sell "Black Edition" processors? its a snap to just up your muti, and bingo, warrenty is out. Its just a game. but i do agree with Wifiwolf that someone would try to sue if they lost a stock report or something.