AMD Blocks Unlock; Gigabyte Fights Back

12:50 - Sunday 7 June 2009 by Tuan Nguyen
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: gigabyte, motherboard, amd, phenom, cpu Category : Tweaking & Tuning

While meeting with Gigabyte at Computex, we were let in on a little bit of information regarding AMD's unlock-block for new Phenom II CPUs.

As many already know, it's possible to unlock the disabled cores on recent Phenom II processors, allowing you to get up to 4 cores working. Many who have tried this say that they gain some considerable speed, but there's a risk. The cores are disabled for a reason: they don't work properly. Because of this, AMD will, for example, sell a 4-core processor at 2-cores, for a much cheaper price.

AMD announced that it would release new microcode for motherboard BIOS updates that will disable the core-unlocking feature, preventing people from going to 4-cores if they purchased say a dual-core Phenom II.

The solution is not to upgrade your motherboard's BIOS if you have a board that can unlock cores.

But what if your motherboard maker releases BIOS updates that add or fix features? You would have to choose. Do you want fixes and improvements or do you want to stick with the ability to unlock CPU cores?

Gigabyte says you don't have to on its motherboards with Dual-BIOS technology.

Essentially, Gigabyte said that it will store the old microcode in the secondary BIOS chip, and allow you to do normal BIOS updates on the primary chip. Does this mean that you can't have a backup firmware of your latest BIOS should the first chip corrupt? Gigabyte told us no. The company has upgraded its BIOS chips to be able to store extra information.

The secondary BIOS chip will still backup your BIOS as usual, but have room for the old AMD microcode. When you update your BIOS, your system will boot using the new BIOS code but it will be injected with the old AMD microcode, allowing you to continue to unlock your CPU cores.

Kudos to Gigabyte for this feature.


  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment
  • Content also available in:
Sponsored links
Talkback
shrex 07/06/2009 03:24
Hide
--1+

this sucks

mi1ez 08/06/2009 11:57
Hide
--1+

Howso? If people are foolish enough to think they're getting a reliable performance upgrade, leave them to it.

shrex 08/06/2009 15:59
Hide
-0+

AMD may purposedly disable cores on fully working quads, to fill that market need, in theory, those would be the fully stable dual to quad unlocks

wifiwolf 08/06/2009 19:12
Hide
-0+

AMD may...
That is not for certain, with this microcode update, AMD gets to be no way responsible if any sensitive work is lost. That's the reason in my thinking.

shrex 08/06/2009 19:53
Hide
-0+

well if you overclock and you lose work are they responsible then, no. I dont see how if you break their warranty by overclocking or disabling cores its their responsibilty.They are doing this becuase they think it will lose them sales of the more expensive triple and quad core processors. I dont blame them for that, they are running a business.

eshaw380 05/10/2009 03:55
Hide
-0+

If overclocking voids a warrenty, then why does AMD sell "Black Edition" processors? its a snap to just up your muti, and bingo, warrenty is out. Its just a game. but i do agree with Wifiwolf that someone would try to sue if they lost a stock report or something.

Comments are closed on this page.
Sponsored links
Ad

Best offers

Sponsored links

Newsletters