Test System
Test System
| Processor | |
|---|---|
| Socket 478 | Intel Pentium 4 Northwood, 3.2 GHz, 512 kB Cache, FSB800 |
| Socket 604 | Dual Intel Pentium 4 Xeon, 2.8 GHz, 512 kB Cache, FSB533 |
| System Memory | |
| DDR-SDRAM | 2x 512 MB PC3700
OCZ Gold Edition Rev. 2 (2.5-3-3-7) |
| Network/Motherboard | |
| 3COM / Marvell 940 | Asus P4C800, Rev. 1.03
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R |
| Broadcom BCM5705 | Epox EP-4PCA3+, Rev. 1.0
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R |
| Intel 82547EI (CSA) | DFI LanParty PRO875, Rev. A
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R |
| 3COM 3C996B-T
Broadcom BCM5701 |
Asus PP-DLW, Rev. 1.03
Intel E7505 chipset |
| Realtek RTL8100S | Gigabyte GA-8S655TX Ultra, Rev. 1.0
SiS655TX & SiS964 |
| Other Hardware | |
| Graphics card | nVIDIA GeForce FX 5900, 128 MB |
| Controller | Client systems : ICH5-R or SiS964 for RAID 0
Host system : Raidcore RC4000 für RAID 0 |
| Hard drives (client systems) | System drive : Western Digital WD800JB
Test drive : RAID-0 array consisting of
|
| Hard drives (server system) | System drive : Western Digital WD1000BB
Test drive : RAID-0 array consisting of
|
| Software | |
| Intel Chipset | Intel Chipset Installation Utility 5.1.1.1002
Intel Application Accelerator RAID Edition Ver. 3.53 |
| Network drivers | 3COM / Marvel 940
Broadcom BCM5705 & BCM5701 : Ver. 6.34.0.0 Intel Pro/1000 CT&MT (82547EI & 82541GI) : Ver. 7.3.13.0 Realtek : Ver. 5.611.1231.2003 |
| DirectX | 9.0b |
| OS | Windows XP Professional Build 2600 Service Pack 1 |
Tests : A Detailed Look
| Synthetic Benchmarks | |
|---|---|
| TCP Transfer performance | NetIO Ver. 1.23 from Kai Uwe Rommel |
| TCP Transfer performance | Netperf Ver. 2.1 |
| TCP Transfer performance | NetIQ Chariot 5.0 |
| Application Benchmarks | |
| Real Life Transfer Performance | xxcopy 2.85.3 von Pixelab, Inc. idf2002_master.avi - 1.17 GB |
| Real Life Windows File Copy Performance | Windows Explorer Drag&Drop Test idf2002_master.avi - 1.17 GB |
During our benchmarks under real-life conditions, we copied the said file five times, doing so back to back. All tests were conducted five times in order to compensate for data dispersion while determining the mean.
To avoid a slowdown of the network adapter through an unnecessary bottleneck, we added a RAID 0 array (consisting of two current hard drives) to each system for this test. As a result, transfer rates von 110 MB/s were, therefore, no problem - that’s more than most adapters manage as a net output.
Latest Miscellaneous News
- 27/05 – U.S. Hacks Al-Qaeda Affiliate Website in Yemen
- 25/05 – Specs for Dell's Windows 8 Clover Trail Tablet Leaked
- 25/05 – Google to Buy Arduino, Raspberry Pi Kits for UK Schools
- 25/05 – Chinese DDoS Attack Takes Down UK Domain Registrar
- 24/05 – Galaxy S III Breaks Pre-order Records with UK Vendors
Latest Miscellaneous reviews
- 23/05 – Act Of Valor: Bandito Brothers' Jacob Rosenberg,...
- 16/04 – The Complete iPad 3 Review: Retina Display, A5X, 4G LTE, And...
- 12/04 – The Windows Phone 7.5 Review, A Month-Long Experience
- 05/04 – Killer Wireless-N 1103 Review: Can Qualcomm Take On Centrino?
- 28/02 – Mobile World Congress 2012: Nokia, Asus, Intel, Samsung, And LG