Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Power Consumption Test System And Electricity Cost

by

These tables show the power consumption of the test system in watts, which consists of a Core 2 Duo running at 2.93 GHz, such as used in a standard PC. The wattage figures are not the actual load on the power supply, but the power measurement at the outlet; this tells you what to expect the full power costs to be. For cost projections, we assumed 8 hours a day at full load operation for a year, with an energy cost of 20 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh).

Formula for calculation:

Electricity cost for 1 year = (power consumption outlet watts x 8 hours x 365 days): 1000 x 0.2 dollars

These values should convey a basic sense of the energy costs we’re dealing with here. The 2D value determines the power consumption without load when Windows and the graphics card are idle; this value can be further reduced with current 45 nm CPUs and power-saving settings. The minimal power consumption of the graphics card is determined by the manufacturer; if the graphics processor and graphics memory don’t reduce their clock rate (as with the AMD Radeon HD 4870), you can help yourself by setting them manually using tools such as Riva Tuner or the graphics driver. Otherwise, you have to live with increased power consumption in 2D mode.

The 3D value is the maximum power draw when the CPU and graphics card run at 100%; this is used as the basis for calculating the electricity cost. In practice, the maximum power consumption at any given time depends on the resolution, filter method and scene within the game. Anti-aliasing (AA) can slow down the graphics card, though this can reduce CPU load and cause the power consumption of the total system to decrease. At lower resolutions or with less complex game scenes, the graphics card might not be at full load. The 3D full load was measured at 1920x1200 pixels without anti-aliasing; this fully loaded all graphics cards in the test scene (which is a Mass Effect startup screen, using the UT3 engine).

Power Consumption of Entire System With AMD Graphic Card
2D Desktop Watts (Socket)
3D Full Load Watts (Socket)
Cost in Dollars 365 Days x 8 Hours
Radeon HD 4870 X2 (2x1024 MB)
202
430
251
Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)
147
288
168
Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)
122
237
138
Radeon HD 4670 (512 MB)
81
173
101
Radeon HD 4550 (512 MB)
81
135
79
Radeon HD 3870 X2 (2x512 MB)
132
132
204
Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB)
95
216
126
Radeon HD 3850 (256 MB)
88
192
112
Radeon HD 3650 (512 MB)
89
167
98
Radeon HD 3470 (256 MB)
90
140
82
Radeon HD 3450 (256 MB)
85
132
77
Radeon HD 2900 XT (512 MB)
142
310
181
Radeon HD 2600 XT (512 MB)
86
170
99
Radeon HD 2600 XT (256 MB)
96
172
100
Radeon HD 2600 PRO (256 MB)
82
151
88
Radeon HD 2400 XT (256 MB)
82
138
81
Radeon HD 2400 PRO (256 MB)
81
130
76
Radeon X1950 XTX (512 MB)
102
238
139
Radeon X1950 XT (256 MB)
105
254
148
Radeon X1950 Pro (256 MB)
102
198
116
Radeon X1950 GT (256 MB)
100
188
110
Radeon X1900 XT (512 MB)
107
262
153
Radeon X1900 XT (256 MB)
101
233
136
Radeon X1900 GT (256 MB)
106
205
120
Radeon X1800 XT (512 MB)
112
211
123
Radeon X1800 XT (256 MB)
109
215
126
Radeon X1800 XL (256 MB)
105
174
102
Radeon X1800 GTO (256 MB)
100
163
95
Radeon X1650 XT (256 MB)
100
175
102
Radeon X1650 Pro (256 MB)
92
158
92
Radeon X1600 XT (256 MB)
92
156
91
Radeon X1600 Pro (256 MB)
93
151
88
Radeon X1300 XT (256 MB)
94
158
92
Radeon X1300 Pro (128 MB)
88
140
82
Radeon X1300 (256 MB)
86
136
79
Radeon X800 XT (256 MB)
93
182
106
Power Consumption of Entire System with AMD Graphic Card
2D Desktop Watts (Socket)
3D Full Load Watts (Socket)
Cost in Dollars 365 Days x 8 Hours
Radeon HD 4870 CF (512 MB)
242
460
269
Radeon HD 4850 CF (512 MB)
177
367
214
Radeon HD 3870 x2 CF (4x512 MB)
199
610
356
Radeon HD 3870 3CF (3x512 MB)
162
464
271
Radeon HD 3870 CF (512 MB)
124
323
189
Radeon HD 3850 CF (256 MB)
111
279
163
Radeon HD 3650 CF (512 MB)
112
235
137
Radeon HD 2900 XT CF (512 MB)
222
540
315
Radeon HD 2600 XT CF (512 MB)
105
246
144
Radeon HD 2600 Pro (256 MB)
98
198
116
Radeon X1950 XTX CF (512 MB)
146
378
221
Radeon X1900 XT CF (512 MB)
149
404
236
Radeon X1600 XT CF (256 MB)
122
209
122
Radeon X1600 Pro CF (256 MB)
118
193
113
Power Consumption of The Entire System With Nvidia Graphic Card (SLI)
2D Desktop Watts (Socket)
3D Full Load Watts (Socket)
Cost in Dollars 365 Days x 8 Hours
GeForce GTX 280 SLI (1024 MB)
203
540
315
GeForce GTX 260 SLI (896 MB)211
610
356
GeForce 9800 GTX SLI (512 MB)235
462
270
GeForce 9600 GT SLI (1024 MB)182
302
176
GeForce 8800 GTS SLI (512 MB)230
445
260
GeForce 8800 GT SLI (1024 MB)184
326
190
GeForce 8800 GT SLI (512 MB)203
392
229
GeForce 8800 Ultra 3SLI (768 MB)388
715
418
GeForce 8800 Ultra SLI (768 MB)294
580
339
GeForce 8800 GTS SLI (320 MB)234
420
245
GeForce 8600 GTS SLI (256 MB)164
277
162
GeForce 8600 GT SLI (256 MB)155
253
148
GeForce 7950 GX2 SLI (4x 512 MB)225
370
216
GeForce 7950 GT SLI (512 MB)170
284
166
GeForce 7900 GT SLI (256 MB)161
256
150
GeForce 7900 GS SLI (256 MB)155
252
147
GeForce 7800 GTX SLI (256 MB)187
340
199
GeForce 7800 GT SLI (256 MB)162
289
169
GeForce 7600 GT SLI (256 MB)145
232
135
GeForce 7600 GS SLI (256 MB)137
205
120
Power Consumption of The Entire System with Nvidia Graphic Cards
2D Desktop Watts (Socket)
3D Full Load Watts (Socket)
Cost in Dollars 365 Days x 8 Hours
GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)
117
352
206
GeForce GTS 260 (896 MB)
111
336
196
GeForce 9800 GX2 (2x512 MB)
173
368
215
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB)
119
257
150
GeForce 9800 GTX (512 MB)
126
264
154
GeForce 9600 GT (1024 MB)
102
187
109
GeForce 9600 GT (512 MB)
106
208
121
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB)
127
277
162
GeForce 8800 GTS (512 MB)
126
269
157
GeForce 8800 GT (1024 MB)
103
198
116
GeForce 8800 GT (512 MB)
115
239
140
GeForce 8800 Ultra (768 MB)
154
313
183
GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB)
146
296
173
GeForce 8800 GTS (640 MB)
138
256
150
GeForce 8800 GTS (320 MB)
127
240
140
GeForce 8600 GTS (512 MB)
98
178
104
GeForce 8600 GTS (256 MB)
93
172
100
GeForce 8600 GT (256 MB)
89
160
93
GeForce 8500 GT (256 MB)
85
140
82
GeForce 8400 GS (256 MB)
83
136
79
GeForce 7950 GX2 (2x512 MB)
120
120
139
GeForce 7950 GT (512 MB)
99
183
107
GeForce 7900 GTX (512 MB)
105
206
120
GeForce 7900 GTO (512 MB)
104
202
118
GeForce 7900 GT (256 MB)
93
163
95
GeForce 7900 GS (256 MB)
95
164
96
GeForce 7800 GTX (512 MB)
105
235
137
GeForce 7800 GTX (256 MB)
105
208
121
GeForce 7800 GT (256 MB)
95
183
107
GeForce 7600 GT (256 MB)
88
152
89
GeForce 7600 GS (256 MB)
88
137
80
GeForce 7300 GT (256 MB)
84
133
78
GeForce 7300 GS (128 MB)
82
132
77
GeForce 6800 Ultra (256 MB)
122
202
118
GeForce 6800 GT (256 MB)
116
185
108
GeForce 6600 GT (128 MB)
90
161
94
Share:
22
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
mi1ez 21/01/2009 11:24
Hide
-0+

Now, how about £ for the UK site, and € for Europe?

mi1ez 21/01/2009 11:41
Hide
-0+

Other than that, a good article. Very informative. Very linkable!

Stonedofmoo 21/01/2009 12:02
Hide
-2+

Out of interest did you test these cards with one monitor connected or two?

I mention this because using a power meter I noticed a strange 'bug' on the Nvidia GTX 280. With 2 monitors connected instead of 1 the idle power consumption of the whole PC increased by 38w!!

I tested this with multiple driver revisions and the latest available BIOS. Turns out I'm not the only one to see this either.

I don't get this problem with my 8800GT 512mb. The power consumption of that is the same with one or two monitors.

Also out of interest why does the 8800 1024Mb use less power than the 512mb model, is it a 55nm core?

Anonymous 21/01/2009 12:10
Hide
-0+

Nice you tested all those cards :O

Musesoperman 21/01/2009 13:17
Hide
-0+

The cost is not that relevent really because using different quality psu's at differing variations of optimal load will produce wildly varying results not to mention the fact that various utility suppliers charge different rates. Therefore, I see no real need for a conversion to pounds or euro's for those of us living in areas outside of the US. What is important and interesting about this article is that it allows people to make an informed choice about what psu is likely to be best for their chosen setup by using the figures in a comparative way regardless of cost. Great article.

Anonymous 21/01/2009 18:15
Hide
--2+

small reminder for "green" people.
ask yourself following questions:
Does my house use electricity/oil for heating?
if yes how much?
conclusion: your computer reduces heating costs the same amout it consumes energy 1:1.
ofcourse same applies to lights/tv/etc
when calculating "waste" energy you really need to dig deep before getting correct answer.

Zimbu 21/01/2009 18:36
Hide
--1+

well that argument isn't entirely correct because certain things like lights don't radiate heat into the room it stays near the ceiling.
also high temperatures reduce the lifespan of a pc - and require more airflow and cooling which will relate to more dust and the need for more regular maintainanceof the PC.
also during the summer time when it is hot you don't require heating so any heat generated then IS wasted energy.
generally speaking wherever any energy is wasted it is better to eliminate it because 9 times out of 10 it will pay off.

Anonymous 22/01/2009 12:04
Hide
--1+

Every single article I have read today has someone complaining about dollars and pounds.
It would take less time to lookup a local price, do a conversion or order the thing from the US.
whining pomm stereotype is never going to go away.

Anonymous 22/01/2009 01:10
Hide
--3+

This "mi1ez " guy has no life eithere that or his from a different site and doesn't like this one.. Why don't you go to every site on the net that's in dollars and tell them change to GBP just because your to lazy to do a conversion.. Get a life

Musesoperman 22/01/2009 01:50
Hide
-1+

er fookdis....I don't know what country you live in but here in UK it's kinda hard to "order the thing from the US" when we are talking about power providers. As for conversions its usually pretty easy since the pound is generally worth a little under 2 US dollars. But I cartainly agree that to niggle about the fact that the article only gives prices in US currency for the reasons I already stated above. I'm sure the author of the review only included a cost comparison as a rough guide anyway. On the other hand, there is an underlying issue here in which milez actually has a point. Every article I've ever read here is exactly the same whether you read it on the "uk content" or "us content" pages and sometimes this causes incorrect comparisons as you can see if you read my response to the recent 3x2mb ddr3 memory test.

Anonymous 22/01/2009 08:19
Hide
-1+

"...since the pound is generally worth a little under 2 US dollars"

Those were the days. Happy, recession free days.

Musesoperman 22/01/2009 11:22
Hide
-0+

Fair point. It's more like 1.65 atm. But the other problem with buying "cheaper" gear from the US is that by the time you add the postage it's actually MORE expensive than the inflated UK prices. For example, the postage charge on motherboards from US to UK is around the $70+ mark. The point I'm making (off topic) though is that when reviews start doing hardware test conclusions based on an American concept of "value" there is definately a "lost in translation" problem and it is THIS that should be looked at when considering content changes between reviews on US and UK Content pages.

Anonymous 22/01/2009 12:15
Hide
-0+

1.65?!

It is about £1 - $1.38 at the moment. Which is changing daily. You really wouldn't want to be buying anything from either the US or Eurozone at the moment.

Anonymous 23/01/2009 10:29
Hide
-0+

Ha Ha,

Maybe they should evacuate everyone from the UK across the channel in little fishing boats and let the island sink under the weight of the debt it's carrying. No debt - no problem. (Except for the french having to put up with the englishers.)

Musesoperman 23/01/2009 11:38
Hide
-1+

Dubbya. We already did that before...we sent all the criminals to America and Australia (and most of those who went on their own were fleeing the threat of the debters prisons). But let's not get into some petty one upmanship that you don't have the mental capacity to persue eh.

luicpend 23/01/2009 14:23
Hide
-0+

Stonedofmoo :
Out of interest did you test these cards with one monitor connected or two?I mention this because using a power meter I noticed a strange 'bug' on the Nvidia GTX 280. With 2 monitors connected instead of 1 the idle power consumption of the whole PC increased by 38w!!I tested this with multiple driver revisions and the latest available BIOS. Turns out I'm not the only one to see this either.I don't get this problem with my 8800GT 512mb. The power consumption of that is the same with one or two monitors.Also out of interest why does the 8800 1024Mb use less power than the 512mb model, is it a 55nm core?



Indeed it seems strange that the 1024 Mb configuration would consume more power, is that perhaps a mistake on the table or test?

On a review on www.techpowerup.com about the VVIKOO GeForce 8800 GT, it is written: "In Idle we see no difference between the 1024 MB and the 512 MB version of the 8800 GT. Under load this changes slightly, with the 1 GB version taking a small 10W lead (~5%). The peak power draw is higher as well with 231 W vs. 213 W on the 8800 GT 512 MB. This increase in power draw was to be expected since the additional eight memory chips will consume some power."

smeghead1986 25/01/2009 17:47
Hide
-0+

To all the posters complanting about us$ used
"We used 20 cents (the price at the Munich utility company Stadtwerke München) for the electricity calculation. PSU stands for the power supply unit." so they used euro's which are 1:1 with the pound quote taken from page 2

DC39 26/01/2009 16:29
Hide
-0+

Very good article, I had been thinking for years that the power consumption for the graphics cards is going maddly off the scale. I have an 2nd PC used by the family thats has an old TI4600 card and I would like to upgrade it because some DirectX 9 games fail to work but its only a 250watt Shuttle case+psu. Anyone any ideas how much a TI4600 draws and what I could swap it for without killing the shuttle psu?

Bowmanspeer 27/01/2009 15:18
Hide
-0+

Being one that is currently experiencing power issues I found this to be information I desperately needed!

Anonymous 30/01/2009 02:26
Hide
-0+

So will the power consumption start playing into the monthly value shakedowns? Speaking of which, where's the "Best Video Cards For The Money: Jan '09" article?


Best offers

Newsletters


OK