VGA Charts 2008: 101 Configurations Tested
Table of contents
- 1. Five Generations Tested
- 2. Chip Comparison And Test Configuration
Our largest and most up-to-date 3D comparison covers 101 different graphics card configurations spanning five technology generations. The test includes the Radeon X800, X1000, HD 2000, HD 3000, GeForce 6, 7, 8, 9 families, as well as the new HD 4000 series from AMD and both of the GTX 200 models from Nvidia. A total of 500 hours of work was invested in the 6,767 test values, which consist of tests taken at three resolutions (1280x1024, 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 pixels) both with and without anisotropic filtering (AF) and anti-aliasing (AA).
The local grid provided more than 110,000 watts of power for our tests, while the neighbors were serenaded by the maximum noise level of 58.3 dB(A) when running AMD’s Radeon HD 2900 XT CrossFire and X1950 CrossFire. The GTX 260 SLI and 8800 Ultra SLI reached temperatures of over 100 degrees C, causing the GPUs with no additional fans to give up and either choke thermally or crash the PC.
With an artificially-imposed speed limit set by the Core 2 Extreme X6800 running at 2.93 GHz, the current dual-card solutions made up of two Radeon HD 4870s, GeForce GTX 260s or GTX 280s showed very little or no improvement in overall performance. The SLI and CrossFire configurations are frequently slower than a single card due to badly optimized games. In this test environment, the right benchmark and the selected resolution determine whether purchasing the most powerful 3D boards is actually worthwhile. Performance differences are most perceptible at 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 resolutions when AA is enabled.
Editor’s Note: The following five pages will tell you all about the cards we tested, the benchmarks we ran, the settings we chose, the bugs we ran into, and the results we saw. On the last page of this introduction to our newest charts, right underneath our recommendations on which cards to consider, you’ll find a link straight to the data. Use that page for all of your own product comparisons.
Latest Graphics Cards News
- 20/05 – Qualcomm Hires Former AMD CTO Demers
- 18/05 – Nvidia Responds to GeForce 600 Series V-Sync Stuttering Issue
- 18/05 – Behold: Here Are The First Unreal Engine 4 Screens
- 17/05 – Nvidia Debuts GK110-based 7.1 Billion Transistor Super GPU
- 17/05 – GE Announces Kepler Graphics Card for Military and Aviation
Latest Graphics Cards reviews
- 18/05 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – Best Graphics Cards For The Money: May 2012
- 10/05 – GeForce GTX 670 2 GB Review: Is It Already Time To Forget GTX...
- 09/05 – Video Teaser: Radeon HD 7800 Series Remains A Solid Value
- 08/05 – Benchmarking AMD's 768-Shader Pitcairn: Not For Public...

Page 5?
Nothin pointing out the bleedin obvious - mind you I guess you are in a rush to post inanely on every other article that Toms produces

The 110,000w figure is completely useless. kw/h means something, amps kinda means something. Watts just means you added all the peak loads of each test to come up with an impressive sounding number... I doubt you actually drew 110kw from the grid in one go - I doubt Toms has enough plug sockets
wow stats!
Is there any point???
mi1ez, surely you know by now they only have 4 page articles on thw.co.uk
Should we all take bets as to how long it'll take the .co.uk site to fix the problem with this article...
(just heading over to the .com site now, I'm assuming it'll be ok there.)
***PAGE 5 WOULD OF BEEN NICE !!****
Where is the ATI Radeon HD 4870x2 ?
The reason why the Radeon HD4870x2 isn’t listed in this test and the reason why it doesn’t appear on the 2008 Q3 graphic card charts at the top (where it should be!) although the HD4870x2 WAS LAUNCHED IN Q3 THW!! is that the THW team have always had their heads shoved firmly up Nvidia’s dark and scary place! Hopefully one day the THW team will pull their collective heads out, wipe the chicken crap’e from their faces, smell the clean air and start publishing completely unbiased reviews, benchmarks and quarterly charts! Anyone noticed the THW teams almost puke worthy lame excuse for not listing the best PCIE Card for Over $350 in September? Could the real reason be that an ATI card would be sitting at the top instead of Nvidia? THW has been avoiding naming the HD4870x2 as king like the plague holding out for Nvidia to launch an HD4870x2 killer. Come on THW really pathetically obvious!
Why can't i see the test results?? May be any page lost???
Just searching for some info with toms' own search function,
brought up this reference. So where is page 5 and all the rest?
Ian.