Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: March '09

by

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.

So if you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right card, fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming cards offered for the money.

February Review and March Updates:

The graphics card market has stabilized a little since the introduction of the GeForce GTX 295 in January, and while prices will fall over time, we haven't seen the huge drops this month like we did after the GTX 295 arrived and put pressure on the Radeon HD 4870 X2.

Having said that, we've seen the market offer a lot more Radeon HD 4870 512 MB cards at a very low $165 price point. At this price, they're getting so close to Radeon HD 4850s and GeForce 9800 GTX+ cards that it's hard to recommend those older cards any more. It seems only a few months ago that Radeon HD 4870s were a decent buy at almost twice that price and the opportunity to CrossFire a pair of Radeon HD 4870s for $330 is pretty darn compelling. It's certainly impacting our recommendations this month.

While February didn't really bring any new cards to market, we did see the return of an old favorite with a new name: the GeForce GTS 250, which is essentially a re-branded GeForce 9800 GTX+. Some folks are getting riled up over Nvidia's practice of re-naming old models, but frankly, as long as they offer good performance for the price, I don't have a huge problem with it. I will say re-naming a product is probably confusing for consumers, which is a definite negative, but on the other side of the coin, I can understand why it's important to market products and keep them fresh for the buying public.

The word on the street is that the naming shenanigans won't stop there, with the GeForce 8800 GT/9800 GT to soon be renamed as the GeForce GTS 240. Some reports say this product might at least be overclocked compared to the 8800 GT/9800 GT, which would help justify the new designation. If it turns out to use the same reference clocks, then we'll have a product that has been renamed twice with no tangible upgrades whatsoever, which is probably pushing it a little.

Finally, it is rumored that the lower-tiered GeForce 9000-series GPUs will be renamed in the G 100 to GT 150 range. The GeForce 9500 GT will likely become the GT 150, the GeForce 9400 GT will likely become the GT 140, etc. While this will be confusing at first, I guess there's a silver lining in that all GeForce models' performance will be easily distinguishable against each other based on the model number alone. For example, right now it's a little ambiguous for the consumer to determine whether a GeForce 9500 GT would perform better or worse than a GeForce GTX 260. In the future, comparing a GeForce GT 150 to a GeForce GTS 250 or a GeForce GTX 260 based on the nomenclature alone will be easier. Maybe in the final analysis, the consumer will be less confused.

A final interesting tidbit we've noticed over the past month is more information about AMD's upcoming Radeon HD 4000-series refresh to battle Nvidia's GT200b refresh. The buzz seems to be that AMD is either re-engineering the RV770 into a new 40nm RV790, or just releasing a faster version of the RV770 that may or may not have a new stepping. In either case, the GPU will sport the same technical specifications, but will be released in a new card with notably higher clock speeds. Without any hard evidence, it's our guess that it'll likely be called something like the Radeon HD 4890 or Radeon HD 4970. If this is the case, will a future Radeon HD 4890 X2 be strong enough to take down Nvidia's reigning GeForce GTX 295 champ?

The hearsay about AMD's future midrange GPU, the RV740, is even more interesting. If the rumors are true, then the RV740 will be the heart of the upcoming Radeon HD 4700 series, with the Radeon HD 4770 able to challenge the Radeon HD 4850 and GeForce 9800 GTX+/GTS 250 for just over $100. If this comes to pass in a timely manner, then it will really change the graphics card landscape quickly. The Radeon HD 4750 would likely challenge the Radeon HD 4830 and GeForce 9800 GT for under $100.

Of course, for all of this to work, AMD must execute quickly and flawlessly. And like all rumors, we're not sure how much is based on reality, but it's certainly something to look forward to if true. Enough of the nebulous future though, as we look at some concrete recommendations for today.

Some Notes About Our Recommendations

A few simple guidelines to keep in mind when reading this list:

  • This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the cards on this list are more expensive than what you really need;
  • Prices and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t offer up-to-the-minute accurate pricing info, but we can list some good cards that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest;
  • The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary;
  • These are new card prices. No used or open-box cards are in the list—they might be a good deal, but it’s outside the scope of what we’re trying to do.
  • You'll notice the Newegg theme on this piece are similar to what you see in our System Builder Marathons. Before this story went live, we hunted down the best prices on these recommendations to present. That doesn't mean prices won't change later, but you should at least get a good idea of the low prices for most of our suggestions.
Share:
13
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
the Innocent 17/03/2009 07:50
Hide
-0+

you should add the 9400m. I would love to see where that falls in performance.

Anonymous 17/03/2009 09:19
Hide
-1+

the 780/790 G chipsets would be good to see in this lineup...

waxdart 17/03/2009 12:40
Hide
-1+

I’d be interested to see if these price points were always the same over the years. Possible resolutions and game demands filtering down. But no real gain at any point. Today’s Fair 1920x1200 was Yesterdays Fair 800x600. You still paid $130 so you didn’t have to put up with 640x480

In short.
Best PCI Express (PCIe) Card For ~$70:
Good 1680x1050 most games

Best PCIe Card For ~$85:
Good 1680x1050 most games

Best PCIe Card For ~$100 :
Good 1680x1050 most games
Fair 1920x1200

Best PCIe Card For ~$130 :
Fair 1920x1200

Best PCIe Card For ~$180 :
Great 1920x1200 most games

Best PCIe Card For ~$260 : (X2)
Great 1920x1200 most games
Fair 2560x1600

Best PCIe Card For ~$330 : (X2)
Great 1920x1200
Fair – Good 2560x1600

Best PCIe Card For ~$400: (X2)
Exceptional 1920x1200
Fair – Good 2560x1600

Best PCIe Card For ~$500:
Exceptional 1920x1200
Good 2560x1600

aje21 17/03/2009 14:22
Hide
-3+

Huh, how can you say about two GTX260s in SLI "as with the single cards, we recommend the older core 192 versions due to the lower price" when the GTX 260 comment is "we are recommending the newer 'Core 216' version of the GeForce GTX 260, instead of the older version with 192 shader processors."

jerreece 17/03/2009 16:16
Hide
-2+

There's a decent little stat typo in your $180 recommendation. You specifically recommend the "GeForce GTX 260 (Core 216)", yet in its specifications you list "Universal Shaders: 192"

So which one are you recommending? The Core 216, or the original GTX 260?

This is also con fuddled more by the error pointed out by aje21.

jerreece 17/03/2009 16:20
Hide
-2+

Oh yeah, I should point out. I just ordered an MSI GTX 260 Core 216 through NewEgg.com a couple days ago. The Core 216 can be had for $189 before MIR (currently $30MIR = $159). So really, I think I'd be hard pressed to recommend the original GTX 260 based on price.

GTX 260 prices in general have come down recently. And with the original GTX being phased out entirely for the Core 216, I'd think the Core 216 would be the best bet for someone who intends to do SLI later on.

Anonymous 18/03/2009 08:32
Hide
-1+

I'd love to see the recent IGP's (780G/790G, G35, G43/G45 etc) included in the hierarchy list. Would be usefull to assess when adding a discreet card actually starts making sense.

wild9 18/03/2009 13:57
Hide
-2+

Thanks for the interesting article.

mi1ez 18/03/2009 15:22
Hide
-0+

Mobile GPUs have a separate page accessible from the homepage, and IGPs, even NVidia's, don't need to be compared here as that isn't the point of the article.

Helloworld_98 18/03/2009 17:56
Hide
-0+

You guys got one fact wrong, a GTX 295 is 2x 260's not 280's hence the same amount of cores per gpu and memory bandwidth.

And if CF was as good as SLI then dual 4870 1gb's would outpace the GTX 295 for $140 cheaper.

s3k3r 19/03/2009 17:24
Hide
-0+

In my part of the EU prices are MUCH higher -.-

hikeran 30/03/2009 20:31
Hide
-0+

9600gt cost around 90~120euro in grece how do set at 85$ ok. 100euro it's not 85$. 85$ are less euros or the shop here are extremly expenisve

karnak 03/04/2009 19:42
Hide
-0+

hikeran :
9600gt cost around 90~120euro in grece how do set at 85$ ok. 100euro it's not 85$. 85$ are less euros or the shop here are extremly expenisve



USA and Canada definately seem to enjoy cheapest graphics cards prices for the most part.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK