Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 And 660 Review: Kepler At $110 And $230

We have two new graphics cards in the lab today: Nvidia's GeForce GTX 650 and 660, filling the gap between its GeForce GT 640 and GTX 660 Ti with Kepler derivatives. Are these GK107- and GK106-based boards able to challenge the Radeon HD 7750 and 7850?

Nearly six months have passed since Nvidia launched its Kepler architecture with the GeForce GTX 680, a card that we praised for its much-improved efficiency and raw performance. Since then, we've seen the company replace Fermi-based models with the GeForce GTX 690, 670, 660 Ti, and the GT 640, all leveraging the same technology.

AMD, which had already launched several of its own current-gen cards when Nvidia struck back, is fighting off the competition with performance-enhancing driver updates, deep price cuts, and BIOS-based overclocking of existing models. What was previously a stable graphics card market is now an all-out battleground, pockmarked with old price tags and new, more attractive deals. Of course, patient enthusiasts have to be loving it, while the gamers who jumped early continue to enjoy their high-end hardware. 

In the more mainstream space, AMD's $110 Radeon HD 7750 and $210 Radeon HD 7850 are dominant, though. Nvidia is finally ready to throw some Kepler-based competition up against those quick and quiet budget-oriented boards. Today, we're being introduced to the GeForce GTX 650 at $109 and the GeForce GTX 660, expected to sell for $229.

Meet GeForce GTX 650

If this block diagram looks familiar, you probably saw it in Nvidia GeForce GT 640 Review: Cramming Kepler Into GK107. GeForce GTX 650 uses the same GK107 graphics processor as the existing GeForce GT 640. It sports two SMX clusters with a total 384 CUDA cores and 32 texture units, and it's capable of producing 16 full-color pixels per clock cycle thanks to two ROP clusters.

So far, the GeForce GTX 650 looks exactly the same as GeForce GT 640. So, what makes it different?

The GeForce GTX 650 has two distinct advantages over the GT 640: higher clock rates and GDDR5 memory. The GTX 650's 1058 MHz core clock is 158 MHz higher than the GT 640, but this is a relatively minor boost. The real performance boost comes from the GDDR5, which offers two times the bandwidth per clock cycle than DDR3. This improvement is key to the GeForce GTX 650's potential to compete with AMD's Radeon HD 7750.

Let's have a closer look at this card as it compares to the playing field:

GeForce GT 640
GeForce GTX 650
Radeon HD 7750GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTS 450
Shader Cores
Texture Units
Color ROPs
Fabrication process
28 nm
28 nm28 nm40 nm40 nm
Core (Shader) Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz800 MHz
900 (1800) MHz783 (1566) MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz DDR3
1250 MHz GDDR51125 MHz GDDR5
1025 MHz GDDR5902 MHz GDDR5
Memory Bus
Memory Bandwidth
28.5 GB/s
80 GB/s72 GB/s98.5 GB/s
57.7 GB/s
Graphics RAM
1/2 GB GDDR5
1/2 GB GDDR51/2 GB DDR3
Power Connectors
1 x 6-pin
1 x 6-pin1 x 6-pin
Maximum Thermal
Design Power
65 W
64 W
55 W
116 W
106 W

The GeForce GTX 650's memory bandwidth advantage over the GT 640 is huge. It also appears superior to the GeForce GTS 450 in almost every way, and should compete readily against the Radeon HD 7750 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti.

Originally, we expected the GeForce GT 640 to fall under $100. And at $110, the GeForce GTX 650 will almost assuredly push the lower-end board down to where it should have been at launch.

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Overclock (GV-N650OC-2GI)

Gigabyte's GeForce GTX 650 is expected to sell for $140, which is $30 more than Nvidia's suggested price, and likely a result of the card's 2 GB of GDDR5. Less expensive models will include one gigabyte. A 1111 MHz core clock is 53 MHz above the reference specification, but the board's memory operates at the same 1250 MHz. 

The GeForce GTX 650 does not feature GPU Boost, so any overclocking that happens beyond 1111 MHz is going to have to be manually-triggered.

Although the reference GeForce GTX 650 has two dual-link DVI ports and one mini-HDMI output, Gigabyte adds an analog VGA connection. All told, the card supports four screens operating concurrently: three in Surround mode and one extended desktop.

The card’s PCB is the same 5.5" long as the Afox GeForce GT 640 we've already reviews. But the GeForce GTX 650 stands a full 4.5"-tall, rather than occupying a half-height form factor. It requires a six-pin auxiliary power connector, which is somewhat surprising in light of Nvidia's claimed 64 W thermal ceiling. No SLI connector is available, so multi-card operation is not possible.

Gigabyte covers its GeForce GTX 650 with a large heat sink and a 100 mm fan that performs excellently in our noise and thermal testing. The plastic shroud around the cooler extends past the PCB, making the card look larger than it is.

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • mi1ez
    650 looks like being a huge hit with PC builders...
  • mactronix
    I'm disappointed at the price points and performance. I'm in the UK and until recently the 560Ti stood out as the price performance card. These days they seem to be increasing in price and the 7850 has taken over as the card to go to for recommendations. the 650 is competitive but the 7770 is available for similar money and is easily faster.

    I'm realistically looking for a 650Ti card for a viable upgrade unless the 660 comes down in price a lot.
    Guess I can wait for Maxwell to see if that range has what im after in price/performance.
  • infernox_01
    Why didn't you overclock the OEM GTX660? Its obvious that it is the better gpu since it has more cuda cores, just underclocked.
  • bemused_fred
    mactronix I'm realistically looking for a 650Ti card for a viable upgrade unless the 660 comes down in price a lot. Guess I can wait for Maxwell to see if that range has what im after in price/performance.I can see that 5th SMX on the 660 being trimmed for a 650 ti....

    I can see that 5th SMX on the 660 being trimmed for a 650 ti....