Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti Review: Bridging The Budget Gap

by

Nvidia has a sizable gap in its product line between the GeForce GTS 450 and the GeForce GTX 460 768 MB. The company is filling that gap with an all-new card called the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. Is this product a worthy competitor for AMD's Radeon HD 5770?

There is a sizable performance gap between the GeForce GTS 450 and the GeForce GTX 460 768 MB, and AMD's Radeon HD 5770 is positioned smack-dab in the middle of it. The Radeon card currently sells for a few dollars more than the GeForce GTS 450, and yet it offers a notable upgrade, featuring performance on par with the venerable Radeon HD 4870.

Given the current market conditions, AMD's Radeon HD 5770 consequently enjoys free reign over its £100-ish price range, and has for some time now. The GeForce GTX 460 768 MB recently dropped a few quid to add some pressure, but that Radeon card slid a few bucks to counterattack, too. Up until now, Nvidia's higher-priced GeForce GTX 460 SE was the only thing battling AMD for its position. Unfortunately, relatively sparse availability makes that card more of a stopgap measure.

Today Nvidia introduces its GeForce GTX 550 Ti, a card that should change the status quo by delivering more performance than a GeForce GTS 450. The 550 Ti centres on a respun GPU called GF116, which benefits from many of the same transistor-level changes introduced on GF110 and GF114.

The GF116 has a single Graphics Processing Cluster (GPC), with four Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). Each SM contains 48 shader cores, four dispatch units, and eight texture units. All told, GF116 employs 192 shader cores, four Polymorph engines (one per SM), and 32 texture units.

Given its familiar specifications, you might be thinking that GF116 is no different from GeForce GTS 450's GF106. And, from an architectural perspective, you’d be right. However, recall that the GTS 450 has one if its ROP partitions disabled at the factory. The GF116 in Nvidia's GeForce GTX 550 Ti does not suffer this indignity, and all three ROP partitions are fully functional. In this respect, it’s similar to the uncut GF106 GPU in Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460M mobile graphics module. With each of the three ROP partitions capable of eight 32-bit integer pixels per clock, we have 24 ROPs and a cumulative 192-bit memory interface. Because of the wider interface and higher memory clocks, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti boasts 70% more bandwidth than the GeForce GTS 450. This should prove to be a big help when anti-aliasing (AA) is enabled.

The new GF116 holds another notable distinction: it can accommodate mixed density memory ICs. This means that the GeForce GTX 550 Ti can be equipped with 1 GB of graphics RAM, unlike previous 192-bit cards with three 64-bit memory partitions limited to 3 x 256 MB (768 MB—not enough to be optimal) or 3 x 512 MB (1.5 GB—too expensive for a budget card).

Now we have a good idea what to expect from the GeForce GTX 550 Ti: it’s a GeForce GTS 450 with a 50% increase of ROPs and memory interface width, and overclocked for good measure. With these specifications, Nvidia claims that the new card provides 28% higher performance than the GTS 450, with 20% more performance per watt. We’ll put those marketing figures to the test in our benchmarks, but for now let’s consider how the new card stacks up against its competition:


GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 460 768 MB
Radeon HD 5770
Shader Cores
192
192
336
800
Texture Units
32
32
56
40
Full Colour ROPs
16
24
24
16
Graphics Clock
783 MHz
900 MHz
675 MHz850 MHz
Shader Clock
1566 MHz
1800 MHz
1350 MHz850 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz
1025 MHz
900 MHz1200 MHz
GDDR5 Memory
1 GB
1 GB
768 MB1 GB
Memory Interface
128-bit
192-bit
192-bit128-bit
Memory Bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
98.5 GB/s
86.4 GB/s76.8 GB/s
Texture Filtering Rate
25.1 GTex/s
28.8 GTex/s
37.8 GTex/s34 GTex/s
Connectors
2 x DL-DVI,
1 x mini-HDMI
2 x DL-DVI,
1 x mini-HDMI
2 x DL-DVI,
1 x mini-HDMI
2 x DL-DVI,
1 x HDMI,
1x DisplayPort
Form Factor
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Power Connectors
1 x 6-pin
1 x 6-pin
2 x 6-pin
1 x 6-pin
Recommended Power Supply
400 W
400 W
450 W
450 W
Thermal Design Power
106 W
116 W
150 W108 W

Making Comparisons

First and foremost, we need to point out that Nvidia confirmed for us that the “GeForce GTX 460 SE & 768 MB are transitioning out of our primary channel line-up.” GeForce GTX 550 Ti is being groomed as the only bridge between the GeForce GTS 450 and GeForce GTX 460 1 GB. Having said that, the company also stated “end market availability through e-tail can sometimes be found for months after such a transition.” From this, we can expect that GeForce GTX 460 768 MB availability will depend on how quickly the market adopts GeForce GTX 550 Ti.

When we compare the new model to the GeForce GTX 460 768 MB on its way out, we see identical render back-ends, both with a 192-bit memory interface and 24 ROPs. The similarities end there, however. The GF104 GPU in the GeForce GTX 460 is about 50% more powerful, with 336 shader cores and 56 texture units versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti’s 192 cores and 32 texture units. This difference is mitigated a little by the new card’s higher clock speeds. But we still expect the GeForce GTX 460 768 MB to outperform it by a notable margin.

Comparing in the opposite direction, the GeForce GTS 450 shares an identical shader core and texture unit count with the new card. But its 128-bit memory interface boasts one-third less bandwidth, while the core and memory clocks are both about 120 MHz lower. Given those numbers, we expect the new GeForce GTX 550 Ti to perform significantly faster, just as Nvidia suggests.

The real question is: how will the GeForce GTX 550 Ti compare to AMD's Radeon HD 5770? The 192-bit memory interface should afford a significant memory bandwidth advantage over the 128-bit Radeon, but we think the shader core power remains similar (for those surprised at the difference in quantity, keep in mind that GeForce shader cores are not 1:1 comparable with Radeon shader cores). As such, we expect the GeForce to perform similarly, except in bandwidth-limited situations, where it may show an advantage (for example, when AA is enabled).

The  GeForce GTX 550 Ti reference card looks a lot like the GeForce GTS 450 reference card, and according to the specifications, they share the same 8 ¼” length. Having said that, the reference PCB amounts to little more than a suggestion, and both of the launch samples we have for testing are unique overclocked models from their respective manufacturers. Let’s examine them now: meet Zotac's GeForce GTX 550 Ti AMP! Edition and MSI's N550GTX-Ti Cyclone II.

Share:
8
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
wild9 15/03/2011 18:52
Hide
-0+

Quote :The MSRP of the new [GeForce GTX 550 Ti] card is $149 [£93], but real-world prices will fluctuate both above and below this number.


Cheapest UK price could find was £129 inclusive of VAT, which I believe is the MSRP. So that would be +29% more expensive than the price mentioned above. You might be able to knock around £10 off that if you wait a bit (whoopy-doo).

evilgenius134 15/03/2011 18:56
Hide
-0+

wild9 :
Cheapest UK price could find was £129 inclusive of VAT, which I believe is the MSRP. So that would be +29% more expensive than the price mentioned above.



That's because you cannot convert the currency from US to GBP for hardware.

A rule of thumb is to just change the symbol and you get the price we pay in the UK.

doive1231 15/03/2011 23:17
Hide
-0+

Power consumption is the most important feature for me. Interesting to note that the nVidia 550 Ti's have an idle power consumption less than the Radeon 5770 which is surprising. Considering casual gamers would use the cards at full whack sparingly, it could be argued that the 550 Ti's use less energy over time. Tom's did an article on this recently.

wild9 16/03/2011 03:34
Hide
-0+

evilgenius134 :
That's because you cannot convert the currency from US to GBP for hardware.A rule of thumb is to just change the symbol and you get the price we pay in the UK.



I was converting the US MSRP, then comparing it to the UK equivalent, as well as the cheapest deal I could find at the time. My purpose for doing this was to try and show just how much more the British consumer may be paying on-line for the same product :)

gdilord 16/03/2011 12:06
Hide
-1+

For South African prices, times the USD prices by ten and that's the price in Rands.

aje21 16/03/2011 15:38
Hide
-0+

I liked the way the article started off in UK currency, but then slid back to US terminology before the paragraph was done...
That way we know to treat prices with a pinch of salt.

daglesj 17/03/2011 13:29
Hide
-0+

Nice to see Nvidia bringing out a competing card now for an 18 month old design from AMD for slightly more cost and same performance.

Way to go.

amstar 04/04/2011 17:58
Hide
-0+

Pointless release of a worthless card. A slower, louder, more power consuming and more expensive GPU than a GTX 460 768MB.

Nvidia are going backwards, wtf...

Best offers

Newsletters


OK