Conclusion
I'll first say that the new GeForce GT 220 and 210 represent class-leaders as far as power usage is concerned. They also add some new-to-Nvidia features, such as DirectX 10.1, enhanced video decode capabilities, and an integrated audio controller that can handle eight-channel LPCM audio over HDMI (from a discrete card).
Having said that, these features are all things that the Radeon HD 4000-series has offered for more than a year. Sure, these new cards offer Nvidia-exclusive features like CUDA-based GPU computing acceleration in a few applications, and the GeForce GT 220 is PhysX-compatible, but the bottom line is that these cards have to be able to deliver the right performance at the right price. That will be a really difficult thing to do in an extremely crowded sub-$80 arena due to compelling competition.
Let's consider the new GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 as far as value is concerned. It performs better than the GeForce 9500 GT GDDR3 and Radeon HD 4650 DDR2, but not quite as well as the Radeon HD 4670.
With the GeForce 9500 GT GDDR3 and Radeon HD 4650 available for about $50, and the Radeon HD 4670 retailing for about $70, that means the new GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 would be a recommended buy at about $60.
The DDR2 flavor of the GeForce GT 220 would be an appropriate competitor to the Radeon HD 4650 and GeForce 9500 GT GDDR3 if the card were at $50. It would probably make sense for Nvidia to drop production of the GeForce 9500 GT GDDR3 version if that happens, or at least lower its price.
The new GeForce 210 is a more difficult proposition. At these prices, the margins are so small that it is difficult to deliver value. The Radeon HD 4550 makes a compelling argument at a low $45 cost. It offers better gaming performance and superior HD video playback at 1080p with noise reduction enabled. It also does all of this while only using three more watts of power.
What about the GeForce 9600 GSO? We have the feeling that this one will be phased out in favor of the new GeForce GT 220, which doesn't perform as well but likely costs much less to produce. Nvidia may count on the GeForce 9600 GT to woo customers to a slightly higher $85 price point, or perhaps if the GeForce 9600 GSO is finally EoL'ed, it will lower the GeForce 9600 GT’s price slightly. Aside from its power usage, the 9600 GSO is a very compelling ~$70 card right now, so we'd will be sad to see it go.
On a final note, we'll mention that although Nvidia has listed the GeForce 210 and GT 220 on its Web site as an OEM-only product, it was only a matter of time before both models made it to the retail channel.
We couldn't help but notice another item listed there: the GeForce GTS 240 with 112 cores, which is the same number as the venerable GeForce 9800 GT. It's not unreasonable to think that the GeForce GTS 240 will be a 40nm, DirectX 10.1 part like its GeForce 210 and GT 220 brethren. A card like that could make things very interesting in the sub-$100 market. And let's also not forget the rumors of AMD's mid-range next-generation Radeon HD 5700-series cards arriving in the near future (Ed.: like, tomorrow). Indeed, the graphics card world is always an interesting place to be.

LOL Nvidia Just now work at DirectX 10.1
When ATI Radeon have a New Videocard and the Best in The World with DirectX 11
AMD-ATI Rullz
ATI rullz, they have 2. it keeps AMD alive.
I think they're both 64-bit
I don't really know what to make of these cards..two steps forwards, one step back is the closest I can come to a definitive impression.
The 210 seems like it' only good for low-spec HTPC's, or environments where minimal power draw is an absolute necessity. The features like CUDA and extended video acceleration are nice, but do they make up for that 64-bit drudgery that seems to go hand-in-hand with so many nVidia offerings? No, it doesn't..the competition in this price range is too stiff to start making those kind of cut-backs.
Just drop the junk and focus on what's good. The 220 is far superior to the 210, good enough to compete with AMD's budget offerings whilst sporting some nice new features. That 210 on the other hand is the 'MX' of modern technology..you just can't fob people off with this junk anymore, in my opinion. Roll with the technology instead of repeatedly rolling out junk that can barely compete with yesteryear's products..
Not what i was hoping for, why cant nvidia make a card that will rival the ati 4770 and the 5750, the gts 250 power consumption is way to high, i hope the GeForce GTS 340 is good
Compare these cards to say, the Geforce Geforce 2 MX 200, Geforce FX 5600 or the Geforce 7300LE - cards supported the latest features only in name, not in performance. Same thing seems to be happening again.
I reckon even onboard video would be enough to lure budget uses away from the 210. nVidia has obviously skimped, scraped and cut corners until they're left with half a decent card, resulting in a very limited life-span unless you can settle for basic of tasks, very light gaming as well as longer CUDA processing times.
Alas, nVidia obviously feels there's a market for this stuff. But I learned my lesson a long time ago not to be duped by the fancy sales talk. nVidia can make good products, but they make recycled junk, and that's what I think they've done here. The 220 seems OK but that 210..it's a lemming in my book.
*220.
now if only you could SLI these midgets and get more decent performance
which is the better ati radeon hd4350 or the geforce 8400 gs
your opinions are well needed
I have the gt 220 and i think its a very nice card
i have the asus engt 220 with 1 gb ddr3 memory. This is a low-profile card and very nice for games like call of duty 4.
It comes with a few programs (asus gamer osd, smartdoctor and some other programs)
When i play Call of Duty 4 it runs max detail very easy. And on the Nvidia site it says that the following games are viewed good on card:
- World of Warcraft
- Spore
- The Sims 3
- Fallout 3
- Left 4 Dead.
I have played left 4 dead myself on max quality, and its very nice gameplay
related links:
nvidia site: http://www.nvidia.com/object/produ [...] 20_us.html
videocard benchmark :
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/ [...] rce+GT+220