Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Conclusion

by

Conclusion

As expected, at stock clock speeds, our $500 build was often short of impressive. But we aimed to achieve our lofty goals that we had for this entry-level system by overclocking the CPU far beyond out-of-box speeds. There is almost an addiction among hardware enthusiasts to squeeze extra performance out of their components and maximize the value they get for their money. Let’s sum up the total performance gains we achieved with our overclocking endeavors and see how well we measured up to our expectations.

Even overclocked, our $500 PC didn’t fair too well in the Crysis and Supreme Commander Forged Alliance max-quality detail levels, but it managed quite well for the other two games at the highest details. We’ll still say that our choice of components and overclocking efforts were successful on the gaming front, as they raise the bar for our maximum playable settings versus stock speeds and offer a very enjoyable gaming experience. Until 4 GB of RAM and an even more powerful graphics card can be squeezed into this tight budget, it would be difficult to beat out a highly overclocked 512 MB 8800 GT, a 3.2 GHz dual-core E2180 and 2 GB of RAM for gaming.

The biggest percentage increase in performance was in the Audio/Video Encoding suite. Our little $70 dual-core CPU may have low stock clocks, FSB and very limited L2 cache, but cranking up the clock speeds proved to be well worth it, making this low-budget system perform like a much more expensive machine.

Rounding out our other applications, we were rewarded with exceptional gains in three of the five benchmarks with the overclocked PC. Low gains in AVG and WinRAR brought the overall application average down by quite a bit, though.

Our aim was to build a solid, dependable entry-level system that would offer as much performance possible in a broad range of games and applications. Did we make every dollar count? We think so and feel the $500 overclocked PC is a well balanced system offering about as good of a performance as could be expected for the money. But, a big part of this System Builder Marathon is still to come, as we see how our low-budget PC fares against the more expensive machines in overall value.

Share:
9
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Anonymous 30/10/2008 11:01
Hide
-0+

Looking at the three systems that TH has put together for these reviews:
All the CPU's are of INTEL, does this mean that AMD is not an economical option in any of these price/performance brackets?

Anonymous 30/10/2008 11:41
Hide
-0+

obviously not, this test is for price/power. if economy was a big factor in these reviews then im sure an amd proc would of gone in this computer.most likely not the super pc tho :p

Anonymous 30/10/2008 11:44
Hide
-0+

It means that AMD simply isn't giving a decent power:price ratio. As good as some of the chips AMD has released they just don't quite get there in terms of what you're paying for in comparison

kyzarvs 30/10/2008 12:22
Hide
-0+

Surely (as suggested in the article as an alternative) an X2 6000 which is already a 3ghz CPU would be a better long-term bet than a heavily overclocked Intel?

I woud have thought that for those with only $500 to spend, they would also be looking for years of stability rather than ultimate raw speed /shrug

waxdart 30/10/2008 14:20
Hide
-0+

Kyzarvs> well said. The conclusion I got, was there is nothing out there for $500 and you'll have to overclock.

What if you don't want to overclock?

Would anyone here play games at 800x600 to get a good frame rate with high detail. For some parts of crysis I did. guess what - it was still a great game.

goozaymunanos 30/10/2008 17:58
Hide
-0+

well said, waxdart.

cheers,
bill

p.s. stuff and nonsense: http://www.eupeople.net/forum

bobwya 30/10/2008 21:46
Hide
-0+

Well AMD can't compete with Intel at the low because of:


However the choice of a E2180 is a bit stupid IMHO.

Bob

GMoss 19/11/2008 11:59
Hide
-0+

waxdart :
Kyzarvs> well said. The conclusion I got, was there is nothing out there for $500 and you'll have to overclock.What if you don't want to overclock?Would anyone here play games at 800x600 to get a good frame rate with high detail. For some parts of crysis I did. guess what - it was still a great game.




Well put it this way, Would you Spend £250/$500 to run Games @ 800x600 And then be outrun by something even cheaper in the next couple of months?

You have to look at it this way;
Spend Money on a good PC that will Outrun for months/year.
Or Spend a little amount on a PC; which you can overclock to the max and then buy another pc for a little amount once it has been outrun?

Great review guys,

Gareth.

Anonymous 25/02/2009 12:49
Hide
-0+

How much are motherboard's?:)

Best offers

Newsletters


OK