Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Killer Notebooks’ Odachi: Look and Feel

by

What the Odachi adds in pure muscle it gives up in polish compared to Alienware’s Area-51 m17x and even ASUS’ G71. Granted, Killer Notebooks is a smaller boutique outfit, which puts it at the whim of style choices made by whitebook ODMs like Clevo, Armia, and Compal. In this case, Clevo’s D9C is tapped as the shell of choice for Killer Notebooks’ Odachi.

In contrast to the all-black Area-51, the Odachi sports a two-tone grey/black chassis that, by its very nature, is more generic. The notebook’s lid takes an 18-mil laminated graphic shield, adding a more custom feel to the chassis. This is something we’ve become accustomed to from certain resellers thanks to Intel’s CBB (Custom Building Block) initiative.

The ports on either side of the notebook match up well to the chassis. Unlike the Alienware’s flush body, the Odachi cuts in on the right and left sides underneath the available jacks and connectors. Aesthetically, the m17x looks more attractive. However, the stair-step cut into the Odachi’s chassis does serve as a good place to grip the heavy notebook.

With the lid open, you can see that Clevo clearly wasn’t going for the same flush-mounted touchpad. It’s instead recessed and surrounded by a chrome bevel. The keyboard does have good tactile response, though. And because this is a large desktop replacement, there’s naturally enough room for a full-sized keyboard and 10-ley number pad.

Our only other concern is ventilation. The Odachi, loaded with its desktop processor, three hard drives, and two 8800M GTX graphics cards, generates copious heat, which is exhausted from the chassis through four blowers. The quartet pulls air from vents on the bottom of the notebook. Although we didn’t have any heat problems on our test bench, it’d be conceivably pretty easy to block those vents and end up with insufficient cooling. At the very least, this probably isn’t a notebook you’ll want to use on your lap.

More Go-Fast Potential

The folks at Killer Notebooks obviously know they’re at a manufacturing disadvantage when it comes to the other former-boutique shops that have sold to larger vendors, such as Alienware and VoodooPC. To help bridge that gap between brains and beauty, Killer makes an extra effort to tune its notebooks for performance. In fact, the company originally sent its sample running a 64-bit copy of Vista Ultimate with several hours worth of tweaks applied, including optimizations for each installed application that’d milk the most performance from the quad-core CPU.

We formatted the machine to normalize on a 32-bit environment, but it’s still worth noting that our benchmark scores would have likely been higher had Killer Notebooks re-tuned the Odachi as it would have for a customer. In fact, the company says that if a customer sends his or her software to Killer Notebooks as his or her machine is being built, it’ll install and tweak the software to best utilize the hardware. Why didn’t we send the system back for another round of tweaks on our benchmark suite? As you’ll see, the performance results are already fairly compelling.

There’s also another option emerging. Killer Notebooks plans to make its Core Optimization Program (COP) available to customers, enabling do-it-yourself per-application optimizations. Killer says each app takes about 20 seconds to set up and gives the enthusiast complete control over where each thread runs. In this way, you’re able to dictate that a virus scan runs on Core 4 while Crysis employs Core 1, for example.

Share:
4
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Anonymous 25/09/2008 09:45
Hide
-0+

Your blog is very helpful to me.I have got good and useful information about Laptops,note books and coputers and it can be helpful for other users also.For Laptops and note books I would suggest This site:http://www.testseek.com/

leexgx 26/09/2008 07:02
Hide
-0+

Please use Propper size pictures as i am not zooming every one (takes 3-4 secs to load each one when doing that)

even when i use the Print option thay are still in 200 x 120 pixels when it should be 450 x 271 pixels for both print and per page viewing

rest of the review is good

Solitaire 26/09/2008 17:22
Hide
-0+

Okay, I have no idea about the battery life of ANY of the contenders - no mention of them in the text and that one vital image of the battery chart is missing from Toms. Good going guys!

Not that you can claim credit for any of the graphs on this article - all the rest are borked as well. They do show up - as tiny thumbnails. Nice one. Real classy.

Now back to the actual article subject, aka Rant#2. Hasn't it occured to the OEMs that we have a major niche going unfulfilled here? I can think of several nomadic user bases (how about students for starters anyone?) who want gaming laptops but who are unwilling to part with €5000 for something that has the same performance as a €500 desktop. Even with Centrino 2 bringing the RAM and motherboard back up to scratch the near-inability to run games such as SupCom and Crysis shows that the gap between standard and mobile CPUs and GPUs is now reaching crisis point.

You'd think that with such a large potential user base some of the big facs or OEMs would be innovating, but they ain't. AMD seem to have given up on mid-high-range lappies entirely, which give nVidia and Intel carte blanche to sit there doing very little (note to Nintel fanboys - this is what would happen to desktops if your hated AMD died for you - €5000 desktops to not-run Crysis). And yet OEMs continue to specify WUXGA screens that the tiny GPUs cannot hope to power, and all that HD clarity will go out the door if you drop down the res - LCDs suffer badly when running resolutions that aren't native or a root of 2 of the native (and the root-2 res for WUXGA is 950*600 - nonstandard and way too small for use!). Why aren't OEMs using high-quality (and potentially cheaper) 1650*1080 or even 1440*900 screens instead?

As for processors... if Intel really gave a damn they should have implemented mobile quads that electrically isolate half the cores when away from AC, halving TDP. Even without this some OEMs should have put in BIOS tools that overclock and underclock CPU/GPUs depending on power status (battery, AC...). Nope. Asus did try, bless 'em, but their lappy isn't even a high-end gaming machine! Desktop-replacers take note. Alienware should be taking notes - they could really do with those features, especially as their machine is supposed to be a gaming lappy - unlike Killer, who isn't afraid to admit their "laptop" is really a small desktop light enough to be carried :)

At least AW got the ventiltion right... everyone else still has easily-blocked fan ports on the bottom. Why hasn't Clevo tried to put some side intakes on their larger units yet?

leexgx 28/09/2008 01:30
Hide
-0+

guess thay do not bother to read these posts any way
them pictures are to small mite be ok if my desktop was at 640x480, mite even be viewable on my PDA (if it was not for the best of media stuff)

Best offers

Newsletters


OK