Killer Notebooks’ 17.1” Odachi: Hardware
Killer Notebooks takes a completely different approach than Alienware or ASUS does—an approach that requires a little more hands-on involvement from the customer for an ideally better-suited build. Killer doesn’t give you the option of configuring and ordering through its Web site. Rather, you get a breakdown of each of its four models and can contact the company to get an order started.
Processor
As with Alienware’s m17x, Killer Notebooks’ Odachi is no Centrino 2 prodigy. In fact, it’s not even based on a mobile platform. It instead comes with a desktop Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor running at 3 GHz. Naturally, this is going to give the Odachi a significant benefit in multi-threaded applications, since it’s the only offering in our roundup sporting four cores.
The Q9650 is one of the best-rounded chips in the Core 2 Quad family. Centering on Intel’s Yorkfield design, it’s manufactured at 45 nm, armed with 12 MB of L2 cache, and set up to run on a 1,333 MHz front side bus.
The caveat, of course, is that this is a desktop CPU with all of the power and thermal requirements that accompany such a chip. Perhaps most significant is its 95 W TDP—more than twice that of the Core 2 Extreme X9000 used in Alienware’s Area-51. Then there’s the desktop chipset needed to enable this processor: Intel’s P965 platform. We’d expect these factors to weigh in on the battery benchmarks.
Memory
With support for DDR2 at up to 800 MHz, the P965 isn’t a bad chipset choice for a performance notebook—it’s just not the most current. Nevertheless, Killer Notebooks loads the Odachi down with 4 GB of DDR2-800 running aggressive 5-5-5-18 timings in a dual-channel configuration.
Again, as with the Alienware, our sample showed up recognizing all 4 GB of installed memory. However, this was because Killer Notebooks shipped the system with a 64-bit copy of Vista Ultimate (Alienware included x32 Home Premium). After clearing everything off for our 32-bit benchmark suite, the system wasn’t able to see all 4 GB. But the company sent us a detailed instruction list on getting Vista to see all installed memory if we wanted to use it. Clearly, this is an organization dedicated to a more tuned experience than what you’d get from the tier-one brands.
Graphics
Although they come from a previous generation of named graphics processors, the GeForce 8800M GTX GPUs used in Killer Notebooks’ Odachi are actually better than the 9800M GTs used in Alienware’s m17x. Again, chalk it up to poor naming on Nvidia’s part.
From an architecture standpoint, the two mobile components are similar. Both center on the G92M GPU manufactured at 65 nm. Both include 96 unified shader processors fed by 512 MB of GDDR3 memory on a 256-bit bus. Where the components differ is clock speed. The 8800M GTXs boast 560 MHz clocks, 1,400 MHz shaders, and 900 MHz memory. All three figures are faster than what you’ll get from the 9800M GTs.
The Odachi wields two 8800M GTX boards running in SLI. Because the P965 only offers one PCI Express x16 pathway (at v. 1.1 signaling speeds), the pair is forced to share the chipset’s limited bandwidth. Again, GPU-Z reports that each card has its own x16 connection, though—likely due to the N100 bridge chip used to make SLI possible on Intel-based platforms.
Storage
Here’s where Killer Notebooks gets really aggressive. The Clevo chassis used to build the 17” Odachi notebooks can accommodate three 2.5” SATA hard drives—two in a special cage and one more under the battery. Whereas Alienware shot for capacity by using two 500 GB, 5,400 RPM Samsung drives, Killer Notebooks opts for a trio of 160GB Western Digital Scorpio Black Edition drives spinning at 7,200 RPM. Interestingly, all three are striped together in a super-quick RAID 0 array.
However, our storage goblins were out to get us again. During the course of testing, one of the Scorpios consistently threw up errors that prompted Intel’s Matrix Storage Manager to warn us a drive was failing. We pulled the culprit, rebuilt the RAID array using two drives, and continued on our way.
Fortunately, Killer Notebooks offers a one year global warranty on its products. In this case, an advanced replacement would have been covered. We’re still wary about RAID 0 on mobile platforms, though. SSDs truly seem like a more durable way to enable great performance on a notebook—especially these premium models.
Networking
Gigabit Ethernet is enabled through a Realtek controller and 802.11a/g/draft-n comes standard.
Chassis/LCD
Whitebook builders will recognize Killer Notebooks’ Odachi as a Clevo D9C (listed as the D900C on the company’s Website. Clevo sells that particular model with three different 17.1” LCD panel choices: WXGA (1440x900), WSXGA+ (1680x1050), or WUXGA (1920x1200). The Odachi’s graphics subsystem is, for the most part, able to drive the highest-end configuration at its native resolution, so we were happy to see our sample ship with a sharp 1920x1200 screen.
The Clevo D9C sports lots of I/O. Up front you’ll find audio connectivity—a headphone output, microphone input, digital S/PDIF output, and a line-in jack. The right side of the notebook sports four USB 2.0 ports and a Kensington lock. The left side includes a card reader, an ExpressCard bay (in which Killer Notebooks installed an 8 GB Lexar SSD), a mini FireWire 400 jack, Gigabit Ethernet, a modem jack, VGA output, and S-Video/CATV connectors. An optical bay below all of those connectors hosts a dual-layer DVD burner, through Killer Notebooks also offers a Blu-ray upgrade option. Spin the notebook around and you’ll find a DVI output, an AC power hookup, and a curiously-located video input.
Killer Notebooks’ Odachi sports a 12-cell, 6,600 mAh battery, just like Alienware’s offering does. Not surprisingly, it also doesn’t last very long away from a power outlet. Must have something to do with that 95 W CPU.
Latest Notebooks News
Latest Notebooks reviews
- 23/01 – Radeon HD 6990M And GeForce GTX 580M: A Beautiful Lie
- 03/01 – Eurocom Racer: Radeon HD 6990M In A Truly Mobile Form Factor
- 02/01 – Samsung Series 7 11.6" Slate: Breathing New Life Into...
- 02/12 – Motorola's Xoom Family Edition Review: Not Just For The...
- 24/11 – The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, And Reviewed










Your blog is very helpful to me.I have got good and useful information about Laptops,note books and coputers and it can be helpful for other users also.For Laptops and note books I would suggest This site:http://www.testseek.com/
Please use Propper size pictures as i am not zooming every one (takes 3-4 secs to load each one when doing that)
even when i use the Print option thay are still in 200 x 120 pixels when it should be 450 x 271 pixels for both print and per page viewing
rest of the review is good
Okay, I have no idea about the battery life of ANY of the contenders - no mention of them in the text and that one vital image of the battery chart is missing from Toms. Good going guys!

Not that you can claim credit for any of the graphs on this article - all the rest are borked as well. They do show up - as tiny thumbnails. Nice one. Real classy.
Now back to the actual article subject, aka Rant#2. Hasn't it occured to the OEMs that we have a major niche going unfulfilled here? I can think of several nomadic user bases (how about students for starters anyone?) who want gaming laptops but who are unwilling to part with €5000 for something that has the same performance as a €500 desktop. Even with Centrino 2 bringing the RAM and motherboard back up to scratch the near-inability to run games such as SupCom and Crysis shows that the gap between standard and mobile CPUs and GPUs is now reaching crisis point.
You'd think that with such a large potential user base some of the big facs or OEMs would be innovating, but they ain't. AMD seem to have given up on mid-high-range lappies entirely, which give nVidia and Intel carte blanche to sit there doing very little (note to Nintel fanboys - this is what would happen to desktops if your hated AMD died for you - €5000 desktops to not-run Crysis). And yet OEMs continue to specify WUXGA screens that the tiny GPUs cannot hope to power, and all that HD clarity will go out the door if you drop down the res - LCDs suffer badly when running resolutions that aren't native or a root of 2 of the native (and the root-2 res for WUXGA is 950*600 - nonstandard and way too small for use!). Why aren't OEMs using high-quality (and potentially cheaper) 1650*1080 or even 1440*900 screens instead?
As for processors... if Intel really gave a damn they should have implemented mobile quads that electrically isolate half the cores when away from AC, halving TDP. Even without this some OEMs should have put in BIOS tools that overclock and underclock CPU/GPUs depending on power status (battery, AC...). Nope. Asus did try, bless 'em, but their lappy isn't even a high-end gaming machine! Desktop-replacers take note. Alienware should be taking notes - they could really do with those features, especially as their machine is supposed to be a gaming lappy - unlike Killer, who isn't afraid to admit their "laptop" is really a small desktop light enough to be carried
At least AW got the ventiltion right... everyone else still has easily-blocked fan ports on the bottom. Why hasn't Clevo tried to put some side intakes on their larger units yet?
guess thay do not bother to read these posts any way
them pictures are to small mite be ok if my desktop was at 640x480, mite even be viewable on my PDA (if it was not for the best of media stuff)