ASUS G71 Republic Of Gamers: Hardware
ASUS’ notebooks have come a long way. In fact, the company is the sixth largest vendor in North America, last we checked, with aspirations of a top-three spot. Not long ago, ASUS laptops were much like the Clevo designs we’re looking at today—colored neutrally and fairly generic. But the G71 Republic of Gamers design is decidedly bolder.
Processor
We’d expect a notebook with the word Gamer in its name to include some fairly high-end hardware. For the most part, ASUS does not disappoint. The G71 platform itself supports the latest quad-core QX9300—a 2.53 GHz Penryn with 12 MB of L2 cache on a 1,066 MHz bus. Of course, it’ll also do a dual-core Core 2 Extreme X9100 or lower-end Core 2 Duo T9000-, P8000-, or P7000-series chip. Our sample came with a Core 2 Duo T9400, released in July 2008.
Next to a lineup of Core 2 Extremes and desktop quad-cores, ASUS’ T9400 looks a bit underpowered. However, the chip is still quite capable. It runs at 2.53 GHz on a 1,066 MHz bus (with a 9.5x multiplier), yet still sips just 35W. From a raw specs angle, the T9400 looks a lot like the medium-voltage P9500 at 25 W, so we’re expecting great things from this chip in the battery life tests to make up for its slight clock speed deficiency.
Memory
The G71 is a Centrino 2 design centering on Intel’s PM45 chipset. So, while CPU-Z reports that the G71 is sporting 3 GB of DDR2 at an unknown clock speed, there is actually 4 GB of Qimonda DDR3 running at 1,333 MHz.
Naturally, since CPU-Z was unable to successfully identify the modules’ type, we were also leery of trusting its claim that our DDR3 was running 7-7-7 timings. A quick reference with Qimonda reveals the real timings are 8-8-8, though it is worth noting that the memory vendor does sell DDR3-1333 modules with 9-9-9 timings, making ours the more performance-oriented. Kudos to ASUS for its enthusiast nod.
Graphics
Here’s where the G71 is going to come up short versus the other contenders in this roundup. Instead of two—or even one—flagship graphics chip driving its gaming performance, the Republic of Gamers system includes a GeForce 9700M GT discrete adapter. It doesn’t sound like a far cry from Nvidia’s GeForce 9800M GT found in the Alienware and Eurocom notebooks we’re testing here, but the 9700M only sports 32 unified shaders (versus 96) and eight ROPs. Naturally, the GPU itself is completely different—a G96M, similar only in that it’s manufactured at 65nm.
Like the G92M found in Alienware’s m17x, ASUS’ G96M is driven by 512 MB of GDDR3, albeit on a 128-bit bus rather than a 256-bit connection. As a result, theoretical memory bandwidth is slashed to 25.6 GB/s. This notebook’s graphics muscle is understandably only a fraction of what you’d find on one of the competing platforms.
To be fair, ASUS is not yet a major presence in the mobile gaming market, and the G71 looks to be its fastest offering yet. We’re expecting good things from it in the productivity tests, but expectations should be tempered for our gaming benchmarks.
Storage
The G71 chassis boasts two hard drive bays, each able to take a 2.5” SATA disk. Our sample came armed with a pair of Western Digital Scorpio Blues with 250 GB of capacity each. Though the drives only support SATA 1.5 Gb/s (a good thing when it comes to power consumption) and spin at 5,400 RPM, they’re put together in a RAID 0 array and manage to outperform the array of 5,400 RPM drives in Alienware’s Area-51 setup. We still have our reservations about RAID 0 on the road, but the G71 didn’t give us any of reliability issues seen on the Alienware or Killer Notebooks configurations.
Could our issues be related to the ICH7-M controller found on those other systems, fixed with the PM45’s ICH9-M? Perhaps—neither the ASUS nor the Eurocom Centrino 2 systems ran into storage problems.
Networking
Given its Centrino 2 pedigree, we’d expect to see the G71 with Intel’s new wireless controller cards. And indeed, it does come with the WiFi Link 5100. But while the 5100 supports 802.11a/g/draft-n, it only boasts one send and one receive antenna, limiting throughput to 300 Mb/s. Though that’s not bad at all, the other Centrino 2 offering in this roundup, Eurocom’s Montebello, includes the potentially-faster WiFi Link 5300. Fortunately, the 5100 enables the other benefits proffered by the latest Intel wireless products—mainly, power savings and Active Management support.
Of course, Gigabit Ethernet is also a standard piece of ASUS’ latest enthusiast notebook.
Chassis/LCD
The 17” G71 is available with two different LCD screens: one features WXGA+ resolutions and the other sports WUXGA dimensions of 1920x1200. Straight-on, the higher-end display looks quite sharp. But as we moved from one side to the other, creating more acute viewing angles, certain areas of the screen appeared “hotter” than others, making those regions unreadable. We didn’t encounter this on any of the other notebooks.
ASUS’ chassis is of the company’s own design with a handful of unique extras. There isn’t any I/O up front—just a release for the two clasps that keep the lid closed. The left and right sides are surprisingly free of visible ports as well. But it’s all cleverly hidden. To the left, you’ll see a DVD+/-R/RW combo drive that mounts flush with the rest of the notebook, along with a card reader plugged up with a plastic blank. An inconspicuous red door further up the side seems to be held in place magnetically. Behind that door you’ll find a pair of USB 2.0 ports and a FireWire 400 mini-jack. On the other side, you have an ExpressCard bay and on/off switch for the wireless controller. A similarly-placed magnetic door hides two more USB ports and audio I/O. The rest of the G71’s connectivity is on the notebook’s backside. There’s an HDMI output, an eSATA port, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, and the system’s modem jack. Though we’d consider the back to be the least convenient place for all of those connectors, the Gigabit port is probably the only one likely to be used often.
The G71 includes a 5,200 mAh battery, which isn’t as large as the Alienware or Killer Notebooks power plants. But because ASUS’ offering employs lighter-weight hardware and Intel’s Centrino 2 platform, we expect it to show more impressive battery run time results.
Latest Notebooks News
Latest Notebooks reviews
- 23/01 – Radeon HD 6990M And GeForce GTX 580M: A Beautiful Lie
- 03/01 – Eurocom Racer: Radeon HD 6990M In A Truly Mobile Form Factor
- 02/01 – Samsung Series 7 11.6" Slate: Breathing New Life Into...
- 02/12 – Motorola's Xoom Family Edition Review: Not Just For The...
- 24/11 – The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, And Reviewed







Your blog is very helpful to me.I have got good and useful information about Laptops,note books and coputers and it can be helpful for other users also.For Laptops and note books I would suggest This site:http://www.testseek.com/
Please use Propper size pictures as i am not zooming every one (takes 3-4 secs to load each one when doing that)
even when i use the Print option thay are still in 200 x 120 pixels when it should be 450 x 271 pixels for both print and per page viewing
rest of the review is good
Okay, I have no idea about the battery life of ANY of the contenders - no mention of them in the text and that one vital image of the battery chart is missing from Toms. Good going guys!

Not that you can claim credit for any of the graphs on this article - all the rest are borked as well. They do show up - as tiny thumbnails. Nice one. Real classy.
Now back to the actual article subject, aka Rant#2. Hasn't it occured to the OEMs that we have a major niche going unfulfilled here? I can think of several nomadic user bases (how about students for starters anyone?) who want gaming laptops but who are unwilling to part with €5000 for something that has the same performance as a €500 desktop. Even with Centrino 2 bringing the RAM and motherboard back up to scratch the near-inability to run games such as SupCom and Crysis shows that the gap between standard and mobile CPUs and GPUs is now reaching crisis point.
You'd think that with such a large potential user base some of the big facs or OEMs would be innovating, but they ain't. AMD seem to have given up on mid-high-range lappies entirely, which give nVidia and Intel carte blanche to sit there doing very little (note to Nintel fanboys - this is what would happen to desktops if your hated AMD died for you - €5000 desktops to not-run Crysis). And yet OEMs continue to specify WUXGA screens that the tiny GPUs cannot hope to power, and all that HD clarity will go out the door if you drop down the res - LCDs suffer badly when running resolutions that aren't native or a root of 2 of the native (and the root-2 res for WUXGA is 950*600 - nonstandard and way too small for use!). Why aren't OEMs using high-quality (and potentially cheaper) 1650*1080 or even 1440*900 screens instead?
As for processors... if Intel really gave a damn they should have implemented mobile quads that electrically isolate half the cores when away from AC, halving TDP. Even without this some OEMs should have put in BIOS tools that overclock and underclock CPU/GPUs depending on power status (battery, AC...). Nope. Asus did try, bless 'em, but their lappy isn't even a high-end gaming machine! Desktop-replacers take note. Alienware should be taking notes - they could really do with those features, especially as their machine is supposed to be a gaming lappy - unlike Killer, who isn't afraid to admit their "laptop" is really a small desktop light enough to be carried
At least AW got the ventiltion right... everyone else still has easily-blocked fan ports on the bottom. Why hasn't Clevo tried to put some side intakes on their larger units yet?
guess thay do not bother to read these posts any way
them pictures are to small mite be ok if my desktop was at 640x480, mite even be viewable on my PDA (if it was not for the best of media stuff)