Benchmark Results: Gaming
Killer Notebooks’ Odachi scores a first-place finish at 1280x1024 and 1680x1050, as Alienware’s m17x pulls ahead at 1920x1200. It’s of little consequence, though, as we’d only really want to play Crysis at its High quality setting at 1280x1024. Even with the benefit of SLI, gaming at 1920x1200 is not going to be possible.
The Eurocom and ASUS notebooks each demonstrate unplayable frame rates.
Performance improves across the board as we shift to Unreal Tournament 3, where even ASUS’ GeForce 9700M GT manages playable performance at 1280x1024. The higher-end SLI configurations remain playable all the way through 1920x1200. The single 9800M GT in Eurocom’s Montebello is good enough at either 12x10 or 16x12, but because the 15.4” display can’t do 19x12, there are no results for it.
While its genre isn’t really known for bringing graphics cards to their knees, World in Conflict is actually a fairly demanding DirectX 10 benchmark. The Odachi is playable at 1280x1024, but both SLI-equipped notebooks fall off pretty quickly after that. Eurocom’s Montebello struggles a bit at its two available resolutions, and the G71 is unplayable across the board.
Once again, Killer Notebooks’ configuration wins out. In this case, much of the performance delta is likely attributable to the Odachi’s quad-core processor, which is taken advantage of in Supreme Commander. As we’ve seen throughout, the non-SLI notebooks have a much harder time coping with modern titles, even with the details dialed down, as they are here.
Latest Notebooks News
Latest Notebooks reviews
- 23/01 – Radeon HD 6990M And GeForce GTX 580M: A Beautiful Lie
- 03/01 – Eurocom Racer: Radeon HD 6990M In A Truly Mobile Form Factor
- 02/01 – Samsung Series 7 11.6" Slate: Breathing New Life Into...
- 02/12 – Motorola's Xoom Family Edition Review: Not Just For The...
- 24/11 – The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, And Reviewed
Your blog is very helpful to me.I have got good and useful information about Laptops,note books and coputers and it can be helpful for other users also.For Laptops and note books I would suggest This site:http://www.testseek.com/
Please use Propper size pictures as i am not zooming every one (takes 3-4 secs to load each one when doing that)
even when i use the Print option thay are still in 200 x 120 pixels when it should be 450 x 271 pixels for both print and per page viewing
rest of the review is good
Okay, I have no idea about the battery life of ANY of the contenders - no mention of them in the text and that one vital image of the battery chart is missing from Toms. Good going guys!
Not that you can claim credit for any of the graphs on this article - all the rest are borked as well. They do show up - as tiny thumbnails. Nice one. Real classy.
Now back to the actual article subject, aka Rant#2. Hasn't it occured to the OEMs that we have a major niche going unfulfilled here? I can think of several nomadic user bases (how about students for starters anyone?) who want gaming laptops but who are unwilling to part with €5000 for something that has the same performance as a €500 desktop. Even with Centrino 2 bringing the RAM and motherboard back up to scratch the near-inability to run games such as SupCom and Crysis shows that the gap between standard and mobile CPUs and GPUs is now reaching crisis point.
You'd think that with such a large potential user base some of the big facs or OEMs would be innovating, but they ain't. AMD seem to have given up on mid-high-range lappies entirely, which give nVidia and Intel carte blanche to sit there doing very little (note to Nintel fanboys - this is what would happen to desktops if your hated AMD died for you - €5000 desktops to not-run Crysis). And yet OEMs continue to specify WUXGA screens that the tiny GPUs cannot hope to power, and all that HD clarity will go out the door if you drop down the res - LCDs suffer badly when running resolutions that aren't native or a root of 2 of the native (and the root-2 res for WUXGA is 950*600 - nonstandard and way too small for use!). Why aren't OEMs using high-quality (and potentially cheaper) 1650*1080 or even 1440*900 screens instead?
As for processors... if Intel really gave a damn they should have implemented mobile quads that electrically isolate half the cores when away from AC, halving TDP. Even without this some OEMs should have put in BIOS tools that overclock and underclock CPU/GPUs depending on power status (battery, AC...). Nope. Asus did try, bless 'em, but their lappy isn't even a high-end gaming machine! Desktop-replacers take note. Alienware should be taking notes - they could really do with those features, especially as their machine is supposed to be a gaming lappy - unlike Killer, who isn't afraid to admit their "laptop" is really a small desktop light enough to be carried
At least AW got the ventiltion right... everyone else still has easily-blocked fan ports on the bottom. Why hasn't Clevo tried to put some side intakes on their larger units yet?
guess thay do not bother to read these posts any way
them pictures are to small mite be ok if my desktop was at 640x480, mite even be viewable on my PDA (if it was not for the best of media stuff)