PCI-EXPRESS INTERFACE: $200 to $450
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: gaming, graphics, cards
PCI-EXPRESS INTERFACE: $200 to $450
BEST PCI-E CARD FOR $200:
| Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 625 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 993 (1986 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
The Radeon HD 4850 is the new people’s champion, instantly bringing yesterday’s $300 performance level down to the mainstream $200 price point. This card has a lot of potential when used on its own, and becomes a devastating force when paired with a second 4850 in a Crossfire configuration.
Best PCI-E Card For $310:
| Radeon HD 4870 | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 750 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 900 (3600 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
The Radeon HD 4870 offers the same architecture in the 4850 series, paired with its secret weapon: brand new GDDR5 memory. Because GDDR5 provides doubled throughput compared to GDDR3, its 900 MHz clock speed is comparable to a 3600 MHz effective memory speed! This performance edge allows the 4870 to up the ante and offer very compelling performance for the price, competing with the more expensive Geforce GTX 260.
Best PCI-E Card For $400:
| 2x Radeon HD 4850 in Crossfire Configuration | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | RV770 |
| Process: | 55nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 800 |
| Texture Units: | 40 |
| ROPs: | 16 |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 625 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 993 (1986 effective) |
| DirectX / Shader Model | DX 10.1 / SM 4.0 |
In the limited 4850 Crossfire benchmarks we’ve seen so far, it looks like ATI has really learned to squeeze the performance out of their new cards. While a single Radeon HD 4850 performs in the same realm as the Geforce 9800 GTX, two 4850’s in Crossfire will completely decimate the dual-GPU Geforce 9800 GX2, and even put the hurt on the powerful new Geforce GTX 280. Remember, the Geforce GTX 280 costs about $150 more than two Radeon HD 4850 cards!
At this performance level and at this price, we have a hard time recommending anything more expensive than two Radeon 4850s. As more data surfaces as to how the 4870, GTX 260 and GTX 280 perform in multiple card configurations compared to two 4850’s in Crossfire mode, we might add a higher price point to the list. But for now, the power of two 4850’s in Crossfire is our top recommendation for performance.
- Previous page PCI-EXPRESS INTERFACE: $130 to $175
- Next page Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the...
- Radeon HD 4870: Better Than GTX 260!
- ATI Radeon HD 4850: Smarter by Design?
- iBuypower Gamer 942IL: Best of the Best?
- Nvidia's CUDA: The End of the CPU?
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 260/280 Review
- Quad SLI Vs. 3-Way SLI
- Comparative Component Charts
- Best Graphics Cards for the Money: June 08
- Radeon 3850 AGP Plus Single-Core CPU
- GPU vs. CPU Upgrade: Extensive Tests
- Looking for best gaming system for $2200
- Dell's XPS 720 H2C Hot and Cool
- DELL PowerEdge 2600 for gaming?
- Require aid in choosing a system
- How to make my 8200 multi-headed
- Monitor make a difference for Gaming
- Suitable 22" and 24" lcd monitors for gaming??
- Dell 3008WFP
- The nitty-gritty on LCDs
- Can I run xfire on ubuntu?
As always, thanks very much for putting the time and effort in to bring us these recommendations. One thing I have noticed..the price. British consumers seem to be paying way over the odds for their graphics cards when on converts those dollars into pounds. Having said that, the level of performance you can get these days is astounding.
The G84s (and G86) sell cheap for a reason, read up on the problems at http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] 4-g86-bad. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone unless they had money to burn, and didn't expect it to work after 9 months... Hardly a value proposition.
The G84s (and G86) sell cheap for a reason, read up on the problems at http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] 4-g86-bad. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone unless they had money to burn, and didn't expect it to work after 9 months... Hardly a value proposition.
Bad link??
I like the Graphics Card Heirarchy Chart. The only thing I would like to also see is where sli and cf would be on the chart. That way I would be better able to tell if I should go with 1 good card or 2 sli/cf cards depending on price of course. If 2 sli/cf cards costs more then 1 card in the same preformance tier then I would of course choose 1 card and possible by another later on when I want to increase my performance.