Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January 2013

Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January 2013
By

This month's recommendations reflect recent benchmarks we ran on sub-£160 CPUs. As a result, you're seeing our choices shift quite a bit, particularly in the entry-level space. There are also a handful of price changes to cover, so let's get to it!

If you don’t have the time to research benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right processor for your next gaming machine, fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming CPUs offered for the money.

January Updates: 

Although it isn't yet live on the site, we just finished up the testing for our latest sub-£160 gaming CPU comparison. Without going into detail on our findings, we saw that, more than ever, today's games require a quad-core processor to realize their best performance. This shouldn't come as a revelation to anyone, but it does have a significant impact on our gaming CPU recommendations. We no longer plan to recommend dual-core chips like Intel's Pentium. Also, AMD's lower-priced quad-core models tend to look a little better.

We're not suggesting that dual-core Pentiums are suddenly bad gaming processors. In most games, they're still quite potent. But with new titles like Far Cry 3 utilizing additional threads at higher detail settings and CPU-dependent FXAA becoming more popular, the recommendations need to be shifted. Our gaming CPU hierarchy chart is modified this month, too, accommodating our evolving perspective. This may get tweaked in the months to come, though.

AMD

AMD recently introduced an A8-5500 APU. Essentially, it's an A8-5600K with a 400 MHz-lower base clock and a Turbo Core ceiling 200 MHz lower. Its TDP is 65 W (that's 35 W less than the -5600K), and it has a locked multiplier ratio. The company is selling A8-5500s for £80, which is a pretty bad deal compared to the A8-5600K, unless you're specifically looking for a lower-power APU. That's not what this column is about, though.

There's little else to report from AMD this month, although we did see some price drops on existing FX CPUs and Llano-based APUs. At £140, the former flagship FX-8150 is £40 cheaper than last month, and only £25 more than the FX-8120. A Socket FM1-based A8-3870K is down £6 to a surprisingly low £74 price point (although it's worth noting that Socket FM1 is a dead interface, so we don't see a lot of sense in spending money on it). The A8-3850, A6-3670K, A6-3650, and A4-3300 are also down since our last update.

Otherwise, we're still waiting on the Socket FM2-based Athlon II X4 750K in North America. We think that chip would make a great entry-level option if it were available. AMD, what's the hold-up?

Intel

There aren't any new processors to talk about this month, but the company's Pentium G2120 does show back up on Newegg after getting de-listed last month. No matter, though. As a result of our latest testing, the Pentium won't get a spot back on the recommended list.

Prices on Intel's processors remain fairly static, aside from a small drop on the Core i5-3350P. The £135 Core i5-3350P's price is down low enough that we think it deserves recognition as a great starting point for serious gamers. It takes the place of the similarly-clocked Core i5-3450 at £150.

Some Notes About Our Recommendations

This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the CPUs on this list may not be suitable for your particular needs.

The criteria to get on this list are strictly price/performance. We acknowledge that there are other factors that come into play, such as platform price or CPU overclockability, but we're not going to complicate things by factoring in motherboard costs. We may add honorable mentions for outstanding products in the future, though. For now, our recommendations are based on stock clock speeds and performance at that price.

Cost and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t offer up-to-the-minute accurate pricing information in the text, but we can list some good chips that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest (and our PriceGrabber-based engine will help track down some of the best prices for you).

The list is based on some of the best US/UK prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary. Of course, these are retail CPU prices. We do not list used or OEM CPUs available at retail.   

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 5 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    MajinCry , 18 January 2013 23:17
    FINALLY! The 965 is on the list!
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , 24 January 2013 16:07
    Hm. Looking at other sites, and their benchmarks, FX-6300 seems to be pretty nice, reaching i5 in several tests, at a bit over half the price.
  • 0 Hide
    redh4t , 24 January 2013 17:48
    It depends on what graphic card u are. FX6300 bottlenecks some high-end AMD cards like 7950~7970. I would recommend go with nVidia card + 6300, because nVidia cards are less CPU related.
  • 0 Hide
    jonboy79 , 27 January 2013 17:24
    Ive been doing some research and the fx6300 will keep up just with a i5 once been overclocked, and will totaly smoke a i3, but just £10 more than the i3, was the under £90 number made up so you didnt have to mention it.
  • 0 Hide
    jaguarcd32x , 1 February 2013 04:55
    Yes the reason why Nvidia Kepler GPU's don't get bottlenecked by a slower budget CPUis because Kepler cards can fetch textures straight from RAM. Other GPU's have to wait on the CPU marking textures for use before fetching them. There for if you have a budget or slow CPU and are only upgrading your GPU, then Nvidia Kepler will give you better performance.

    This is also one of the reasons why 680 matches 7970 despite having less VRAM. It also has better memory controllers.