Your Crysis performance - Page 3

not to mention they see you over a mile away, shoot at you, and hit 3 or 4 times in a row

what i found weird is when i tried it online i turned down the settings to all high... and i was getting about 30fps then i tryed it on very high on all of them except shaders then i got 40fps how does that work?

screen res is 1680x1050

Go have a shoot out with a KPC at close range and see who dies first from chest shots only.

If your smart you'll suprise you enemy to where he has no chance to shoot back because he is already dead.

Will test in VISTA soon

btw my MAX FPS went to 60!!!! (168x1050 no AA , card isn't OC'd)

Well I finally got around to messing with Crysis GPU benchmark. I am playing at 1280x1024 Shaders/Shadows = medium, Post Processing Effects = low and all others = High. My fps in the benchmark were average = 65, minumum = 34 and maximum = 74. Guys if I were you lower your Post Effects it will give you 10 fps more and cause less shuttering ingame. Weather or not my ingame fps will match those GPU benchmark in a few days I will know. For those who don't know the CPU & GPU benchmark can be found in Bin32 folder.

mine runs smooth as silk also. I love this game!!! cod4 is great and all. but visually this game crushes, and the gameplay is SOLID!!!

i have an AMD opteron 175 @ 2.2ghz(dual core)
Asus A8Ne mobo (nvidia nforce4 ultra)
2gb of ddr400ram and a 8800gt 512 @ stock speeds.i have a 17inch CRT-i play my games on 1280x1024 @60hz.
i havent played the demo(didnt work on my 6600gt) and i will be buying crysis soon
wht are the settings i can play on and get the most out of my system without compromising on visual quality and performance?

The ending sucks, the final "boss" fight is too arcade-y. And why did they use a picture in the final cutscene as the VTOL flies away? Funny, the sphere is alot smaller in that background picture than it was when it grew after they used the nuke.

A bit too predictable all round I thought, but still fun. Absolutely loaded up with bugs though.

@maziar--everything at low @ 1024x768?? u must be kidding!!!
with a 8800gt 512mb card??? i upgraded to the 8800gt bcoz of crysis!

well i tested in VISTA ULTIMATE 32BIT finally
1680x1050 , 0xAA with everything @ Veryhigh with 169.09 drvier
well i didnt see a noticeable difference between Very High and High , here are the pics of one scene with very high and high quality :

XP 64BIT(1680x1050 , 0xAA, everything @ high with 1690.09 driver)
[img]

VISTA ULTIMATE 32BIT :
[/img]

Host your image in somewere like xs.to or other image hosting sites, then click on Post Reply, then click on the image and after that post the link of your image

yeah the ending was pretty lame. I guess after you've played so many games you can tell a good ending from bad crappy one.

They certainly left room for an expansion. Of course it's EA so we should've guessed that going in.

Now I'm gonna go and start it over and see if it's somehow different? Not expecting too much here tho' based on what I already know about this game. I wonder why they even said such a thing?

anywho... I'll probably be playing in the sandbox before you know it.

I'm runing a 3870 ... Crysis on high .... 1680 x 1050 .... edited profiles for the 3870 ... runs fast and fabulous graphics . Tried higher graphics mode buy by the eye .... looked about the same .... so went back to high . Anyone else download and copy the edited profiles peaked for the ATI's ? They worked .

resolution?

After lots of testing ive come to teh conlcusion msot AA in crysis is useless, as it doesnt work ona nything, the one I have found to rock is 4x supersampling, where it simply reders the image 2x in each direction then shrinks it down.

Gives near-perfect image quality no jaggies to be seen, makes it look so much better

Even if I am playing 20 - 30FPS, which tbh, for w/e reason still looks great on crysis. All settings on high.

I've found my favorite settings are:

DirectX 9 mode
Shaders and Textures to High
Everythihng else on Medium
1920x1200

Runs smooth and looks awesome at that high resolution on the e6750 and 2900 XT at stock speeds.

Mine mean machine runs crysis VERY acceptable. 1440x900, everything on medium bar textures, physics, sound and one other thing on high. I'm quite surprised, average frames are 20-25. (shadows on low lol)

AMD 64 3700+, 2gb DDR400 CL2.5, HD2600XT 512mb (800/1400)

maybe u are right, my monitor is 22" , so my max resolution is 1680x1050, so i cant talk about 1920x1200, and i believe u since u are on of the best extremely knowledgable member of this site

Yeah, when running an LCD monitor, you lose alot of quality when you're not running at the native resolution. If I had a 22" I'd be running at the same settings you suggest.

That's the downside to having a 24" LCD. The only game I've come across that I can't run at high settings on everything is Crysis, but it runs incredibly well - and is still gorgeous - with Textures and Shaders at high.

I have 15+ FPS according to fraps throughout the entire singleplayer with my setup. I am @ 1280 X 1024 w/4X AA and all high settings in XP Pro 32bit. My Rig:
Opteron 165 @2394 MHz
Foxconn NF4 ultra mobo
2 gigs of XMS running at DDR 266
eVGA 8800GT Superclocked running 680/1700/1920 (DDR) @ 80% fan
It only got choppy a few times.

My friend has a E6700 at stock 2.66
2 gigs of DDR2 800
and a 8800GTX (stock settings I think)
he runs the game with 4X AA @ 1920X1200 all medium in vista ultimate and he got about the same fps as me.

The size really does help you see soem of the smaller features also means I dont gota be so close due to the low resolution.

Im missing alot of qualit though simply because it lacks the number of pixels needed to display some of the fine settings.


Atm my 8800GT runs it at 25FPS average with 4x supersampling aa and all at high which makes it look incredibly stunning, havent put my water block or anything on yet so expecting a 5FPS increase from the high overclocking

I play on a 46in lcd, 1366x768 native. hooked up through vga port on tv.

Everything on med, excpet for volumetric and postprocessing on low, in Dx10
Stay b/t 25-35 fps, depending on how heavy the action is.

Got:
e6320 @2.940
2 gigs ram @ 830 (1:1)
maximus formula s/e (x38)
Sapphire hd 3870.

gamming it on this tv is effing sweet i must admit.

I get an average of 40 fps in crysis all high dx9 32bit xp @ 1280 by 1024

core 2 duo e6420 @ 3.2

8800 GTS 640 660/1750/960 (outperforms stock GTX, no vmod either, stock cooler)

2 GB mushkin pc2 8500 4 4 3 8 timings

evga 680i mobo

550w powersupply

160 gig 7200 rpm hdd

Idk how some cannot use AA I just cant play crysis without t it makes it look weird, I use 8x aniso from nhancer and 4x ingame aa all on high settings 1280x720 8800GT OC'd 3ghz core2quad.

Sometimes I do go to 18FPS btu its usually while things are louding + moving like when you first see teh bay in teh first level with teh sunset for a while its super slow but usually I get arund 25fps - 35fps even in combat.

My raid0 card is ordered so as soon as I get that vista is going on hopefully can afford the extra 4gb memory I want for xmas to bring me up to 6gb then itll rock, wc'ing gear is here too so im hoping that this and the crysis patch that comes out soonish will boost my performance by quite a bit.