Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > NAS/RAID & Technologies > Help with Raid 5 or 10

Help with Raid 5 or 10

Forum Storage : NAS/RAID & Technologies - Help with Raid 5 or 10

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I have been building a custom PC the last couple of weeks with the help of these forums. After some discussion it was suggested to me that I scrap what I was doing and build a Raid 5 system. So everything is on the way from Newegg and now I have some additional questions. I have ordered 3 Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD7500AAKS 750GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drives for my system, and I have a PK5 deluxe Asus mb. I have been doing some additional reading, and it everywhere I look it seems to say that RAID 10 is the better way to go. I am running a powerful PC not for gaming, but multitasking and running a SQL database. My questions are:

  • Should I buy the extra drive and run Raid 10 instead?


  • The mb says that it supports Raid 10 on the southbridge, but when I look up additional information in the user manual, it only talks about Raid 0 & 1 http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] 3=534&l4=0. I am a total newb at this so I don't really understand how to do this. Do I need a Raid controller card which ever way I go? Or is this something that can be done through my mb?


Any help and direction will be greatly appreciated!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

In a raid 1+0 setup it would go something like this:

Drive 1 - (Raid 0) - Drive 2
| |
(Raid 1) (Raid 1)
| |
Drive 3 - (Raid 0) - Drive 4

You'd need at least 4 drives, the first Raid 0 (Drive 1+2) would be the only one visible and usable on the OS. So with 4 750GB drives, you'd only be able to use 1.5TB of space, the second Raid 0 (Drive 3+4) would be a constant mirror of the contents of the other Array. So for example if Drive 2 failed, Drive 4 would take the place of Drive 2. That's also the case with Drive 1 and 3. A failure of both 1 and 3 would render the data in the remaining 2 and 4 completely useless, and vice-versa.

A raid 10 setup does have its performance advantages, but the problem is the cost of the hard drives. Since both performance and reliability seem to be your need then I think that Raid 1+0 could be for you.

Raid 1+0 is supported in your board, it's just because Raid 1+0 is not an "official" Raid type.

I don't know anything about setting up a Raid 1+0 setup since never really had the money to do it, I think other people might have a clue. I think your board should have either a utility in the BIOS or you'd need to press something like Ctrl+A (Ati Xpress200M boards) to get into the Raid menu before booting into an OS.


Message edited by amnotanoobie on 12-03-2007 at 04:03:30 AM
Reply to amnotanoobie

Wow...where's the love?? I could really use some help here...have my new Build laying in pieces waiting for help here.

Reply to AnUnQuietMind

AnUnQuietMind wrote :

I have been building a custom PC the last couple of weeks with the help of these forums. After some discussion it was suggested to me that I scrap what I was doing and build a Raid 5 system. So everything is on the way from Newegg and now I have some additional questions. I have ordered 3 Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD7500AAKS 750GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drives for my system, and I have a PK5 deluxe Asus mb. I have been doing some additional reading, and it everywhere I look it seems to say that RAID 10 is the better way to go. I am running a powerful PC not for gaming, but multitasking and running a SQL database. My questions are:

  • Should I buy the extra drive and run Raid 10 instead?


  • The mb says that it supports Raid 10 on the southbridge, but when I look up additional information in the user manual, it only talks about Raid 0 & 1 http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] 3=534&l4=0. I am a total newb at this so I don't really understand how to do this. Do I need a Raid controller card which ever way I go? Or is this something that can be done through my mb?


Any help and direction will be greatly appreciated!



Tell us more about the planned SQL server implementation. What kind of databases are we running here, and what kind of transaction load is it going to have? (i.e. number of simultaneous users). What size are these databases?

------------------------------ - SomeJoe7777

"Did he dazzle you with his extensive knowledge of mineral water? Or was it his in-depth analysis of, uh, uh, Marky Mark that finally reeled you in?" - Troy Dyer (Ethan Hawke), Reality Bites, 1994
Reply to SomeJoe7777

It is actually a pretty straight foward DB. The system is a poker machine, running pokertracker, which will constantly be datamining different sites, not sure if it will be one DB, or different DB's for different sites...but probably one DB though, and I am the only user.

I just purchased a 4th WD 750GB Sata drive to bring the total to 4 drives (all the same) and I did pick up a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML PCI Express Lanes: 4 SATA II Controller Card.

Everything I have read says that I should do RAID 10 so that is why I picked up the extra drive. Either direction I go, I will use the 4 drives anyway.

Reply to AnUnQuietMind

With a low user load, probably low transaction load, and databases that aren't very big, I would say you're in the territory where it doesn't really matter.

The 3Ware card will do RAID 5 just as well as it will do RAID 10. (I have that same card and it's very good).

Since you bought the 4th drive, I'd go ahead and set up RAID 10. This RAID should be a data drive only, your boot drive should be on a 5th drive.

For extreme SQL server implementations, I have seen some where you establish 2 RAIDs, and put the database files on one and the transaction logs on the other. I don't think you need to go to that step.


Message edited by SomeJoe7777 on 12-05-2007 at 11:28:13 PM
------------------------------ - SomeJoe7777

"Did he dazzle you with his extensive knowledge of mineral water? Or was it his in-depth analysis of, uh, uh, Marky Mark that finally reeled you in?" - Troy Dyer (Ethan Hawke), Reality Bites, 1994
Reply to SomeJoe7777
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > NAS/RAID & Technologies > Help with Raid 5 or 10
Go to:

There are 589 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Latest best answer
Where are the fuses on nad 7250pe
By fihart, 10 days ago:

You may be on the correct course. Have you any way of checking the fuse that seems to make no difference -- sometimes if a fuse has blown it looks like it's smoked inside. You could test it with small battery and a low voltage bulb or find a friend who owns a multimeter -- or find an electronics hobby store and take the fuse in and ask for a replacement. I may be wrong about the DC part and remember that my receiver is not quite the same model as yours. If the fuse that doesn't seem to make a difference is really 250 volts it isn't DC. If both fuses have identical lettering on the actual fuse body they may both be 250 volts as your observation suggests -- so you might try swapping them and see what happens. You MUST remove the receiver's power lead from the wall socket before touching anything marked 250 volts (that incidentally is the maximum rating of the fuse -- in Europe the power is 220 or 230 volts and in the US 110). Incidentally, there are other ways to diagnose faults on a receiver. Have you tried plugging a pair of headphones in to the headphone socket and see if there's any audio. If you can hook up another amplified system (say the speakers that come with a desktop computer) to the tape output of the receiver this may help narrow down the type of problem.

They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts
Sponsored links