• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
News

Woodcrest launches Intel into a new era

Published on June 26, 2006

Intel today introduced the first processor based on its "Core" architecture: The Xeon 5100 rings in the beginning of the end of the Netburst architecture - a power hungry technology that was introduced more than five years ago and brought the company down to its knees. Core's mission is to restore Intel's competitiveness and lay the foundation for the firm's future. Read more

Microsoft isn't being sued? And Futurama returns? Must be the morning roundup...

Published on March 20, 2006

From techie and business jargon from a triumphant HP and a staff-cutting Lenovo, to Microsoft suing somebody and rebranding their shopping service, it's a lovely morning out there. No, I tell a lie, between Futurama returning and Japanese robots tasked with caring for the elderly ("MUST DESTROY MANKIND" routine switched off, we're assured) it's as weird as ever out there. Read more

Intel Nehalem To Allow Overclocking, Some Processors Will Even Encourage It

Published on June 06, 2008

Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD's overclocking secret , we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel's upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to 16 CPU cores. Read more

NCSA: A look inside one of the world's most capable supercomputer facilities

Published on July 02, 2007

The north campus of The University of Illinois in Urbana is home to one of the most powerful and long-running supercomputer facilities in the world Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Shuttle’s SX58H7 Ultra-Portable Core i7 Platform

Published on May 01, 2009

The XPC SX58H7 brings Shuttle Form Factor to Core i7. Can a system this small support the highest-end processors and graphics cards? We pack the diminutive box full of hardware and run it through our test suite. Read more

Hot or Not? New Samsung and Solidata SSDs

Published on April 30, 2009

Samsung’s new 256 GB flash SSD is a screamer, while Solidata created a questionable RAID-based SSD that runs incredibly hot. Check out one example of what a new SSD should be and another example of what not to buy in this increasingly competitive market. Read more

How Many CPU Cores Do You Need?

Published on April 29, 2009

Sure, you can buy a quad-core CPU... but do you need one? Software has come a long way to support multi-threading since the first multi-core CPUs were released, but how much better are four CPU cores than one, two, or three? Read more

ATI Radeon HD 4770: 40nm Goes Mainstream

Published on April 28, 2009

Mainstream graphics cards are usually one degree more exciting than integrated graphics. But ATI's Radeon HD 4770 serves up RV770-class performance for $109 (and employs an energy-saving 40nm process, to boot). We run the card through its paces. Read more

Sponsored links
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > I have a dual core cpu but can't see it in task manager!

I have a dual core cpu but can't see it in task manager!

Advanced Search

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Ok, the title says it all. I just got a Core 2 Duo 6300 and when I go into the task manager under the Performance tab, I only see one core. What's up with that? Other than that, the whole system is running fine.

When I go to the Device Manager, both cores are shown under Processors.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

give some specs on your system. what motherboard are you using- is it a newer one that supports the core 2?

Reply to chocobocorey
- 0 +

Quote :

Ok, the title says it all. I just got a Core 2 Duo 6300 and when I go into the task manager under the Performance tab, I only see one core. What's up with that? Other than that, the whole system is running fine.

When I go to the Device Manager, both cores are shown under Processors.

Have you reinstalled Windows? I'm not certain if it's true for XP, but under Windows 2000 you had to reinstall Windows if you added a second CPU. This ensured that it loaded the SMP kernel. Otherwise it runs, but only on one processor.

Reply to warthog
- 0 +

in task manager, under View - CPU History. Is it set to One Graph Per CPU or One Graph, All CPUS?

Reply to Akira25

If you previously had a single core CPU then windows might be using the wrong HAL. To verify this go to device manager, click on computer and if it doesnt say multiprocessor PC then you have the wrong HAL. You can change this by upgrading the driver, not letting windows find it automatically and selecting the correct one from the list (probably ACPI Multiprocessor PC). However if you mess this up your computer might not boot :).

Reply to NotSoSober

you can also switch off the second core in some BIOS, which would be a bad thing to do...

Reply to Crashman

Maybe use CPU-Z to find out?

Reply to plankmeister

If you have an older motherboard..... did you ever flash your bios? Post your sepcs, and if you want, before you even do that, download the latest bios version from the mobo maker and flash your bios. I am about 99% sure that is your problem.

wes

Reply to weskurtz81
- 0 +

Try the view selection Akira mentioned, even then you only see 2 graphs in the CPU usage history section - taskbar stays as 1. Look up system info in windows - if it sees your CPU correctly all is likely OK - any benchmarking utility like Sandra lite will then check if both cores are used.

Reply to ms2005

Oopps,

I obviously didn't read the entire OP. I didn't see that the OP said that both cores were showing up in the CPU usage area. That wouldn't be a bios issue, so, NM.

wes

Reply to weskurtz81
- 0 +

Specs:

cpu: C2D E6300
mobo: pc chips p23g (yes, i know it's a piece of crap but it does support C2D.)
1 gb ddr2 ram

This is a brand new setup with a fresh install of Window XP Pro.

Reply to impboy
- 0 +

Grrr...
I left out that I had 2 hard drives installed - one from the old computer, and a new one that was freshly formatted. When I set the bios to boot up from the old drive, I couldn't see the 2 cores. When I set the bios to boot up from the new drive, there were the 2 cores staring me in my n00b face.

So i guess now the best thing to do is copy the files I need from the old drive onto the new one and enjoy my dual core power.

Thanks to all who posted!

Reply to impboy
- 0 +

I had the same problem since the hard drive was configured for another computer (intel p4 chipset) moved to amd am-2 dual core chipset. I stuck the original hard drive and it booted to windows successfully, installed motherboard drivers via cd, and everything looked good. However, it didn't recognize the other core.

*Instead of fresh install, just boot in to windows setup, hit enter to setup up windows (do not use recovery console). After it scans for previous windows installations it asks you if you want to repair. Hit "r" to perform repair-install. This fixed the problem.

Reply to rhk0327
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > I have a dual core cpu but can't see it in task manager!
Go to:

There are 15 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links