Aussie Toms Hardware Site Please ? - Page 35

TG Publishing owned it before BoM.

My points > your points.

I never even had the chance to use that account with the new points system.
It's a still quite a sight to behold though. Pretty sure even after all these years it's still ranked #2 after Crashman in post counts. It's my last piece of souvenir I have on this forum.

It's actually 32.5k, a lot of posts got lost (technically speaking none of those posts even exists on the forum's database anymore, it's all be wiped clean )

+1.

You won't enjoy it though.

I liked the forum look before this one.

It had a reply to button. Much better than having to include long quote or whatever. Made keeping track of conversations much easier.

I did like my slide rule once ... but the Ti59 buried that ...

You do know that a good 29k of those posts Wuzy has are moans of pleasure dating back to 2002

I severely doubt it. Google caches only once at a time and the internet archive was prevented from caching pages from this domain, otherwise we'd be able to go back to 1998 or so.

http://www.archive.org/web/web.php

Check out anandtech in 1998: http://web.archive.org/web/1998010 [...] dtech.com/

Oh wow, what classics. A 6.4GB hard drive!?! A Pentium II!?! That really takes me back.

Yes ... I believe he and crashman increased the site metadata file by 400%

oh trying to create competition huh?

i see how it is

what do you mean by walking upright?

random likes monkeys

reynod is till in the second stage thoug



ooh personal attack that isn't good

so random how long till you ban me?

You should have abrogated your colonial responsibilities so early SS.

i say hurry up with the Indian and Aussie mirror

pfffff.... that's nothing

How dare those farkers taint on my favourite word "rational"! They're nothing, but irrational, emotional jackasses.

That article has an inaccuracy. The Federal Court is not really similar to the Supreme Court, since it doesn't deal with Constitutional matters. It's just the court that deals with most corporate matters. The High Court is the equivalent of the US Supreme court though, and that's likely where any appeals to this decision will take place.

The film industry merely wants the profits that they are entitled to. It's exactly the same as the MPAA and the RIAA. But they don't go about getting those profits in a very "rational" way, let alone ethical.

Good to know.

I hope Michael Jackson goes down in history

Malone you cretin ... sheesh.

MJ should be in the hall of Fame for something more than Music

rockstar

Some of the threads created in the Server forum the past few days are very 'home' stuff, and the replies they receive is super-lame homebuilt forum quality posts.

Why is no one asking the harder enterprise stuff for me to answer?

Maybe I should go spend more time in the Storage forum again and try to see if there's any SAN related threads in there.