Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > MP3 Players > good mp3 player

good mp3 player

Forum Audio : MP3 Players good mp3 player

Word :    Username :           
 

loking for a good mp3 player not ipod maybe zune
size 4-16gb
i was lokking at creative zen-xifi 2nd gen
but i want to know if its good before making important decisions
the reason is i have used creative brand speakers for a while and soundcard
this mp3 player has a good screen size with video and wifi for around 150bucks
my price range is $0-210
any adivice is welcome


Message edited by savan1221 on 08-17-2010 at 07:08:40 AM
Reply to savan1221
Register or log in to remove.

If you want to avoid proprietary solutions like Apple, I'd also forget the Zune.

Lists of good brands to look at always seem to include Cowon.

Personally I have an ancient iPod Mini and a Sony NWZ-E436F (an older mid range model) and an LG touchscreen player no-one bought because it was overpriced.

The contrast between these machines could not be greater -- the Sony emerging the winner on every count -- especially battery life and simple controls.

Sony once a bad rep for DRM and proprietary software needed to load songs.
Mine and the current range have dumped all that nonsense and prices seem reasonable.

Reply to Anonymous

Yes, Cowon is awesome for sound quality and lots of format support. I have the Cowon S9 which I basically use to listen to Ogg and FLAC music files. I dislike mp3s.

Great battery life and nice screen for watching videos. No WiFi.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

I have a Sansa e260 that my wife used before me for years, and unless you are an audiophile it will give great sound for 1/3 the price of an iPod.

1 word of caution, "AVOID THE SANSA VIEW"!!!!

While the View a has larger capacity, my wifes new one needed a new battery within 18 months.

...and while the e Series has a user replacable battery, the View does not.

...and a bit about .mp3 files, 128kbps is CD Quality and few will be able to hear the difference in a higher quality rendering. That and the fact that my Sansa often ignores HiQ files.

A new 4 gig e240 is going for $42 and a 6 gig e270 is going for $55 and an 8 gig unit for those that insist bigger is better.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Martin Crandall on 09-12-2010 at 04:41:48 AM
Reply to Martin Crandall

Martin Crandall wrote :



...and a bit about .mp3 files, 128kbps is CD Quality and few will be able to hear the difference in a higher quality rendering.



I don't think most people would equate 128k to CD quality. I like at least 192k, and I know audiophiles that insist that they can't stand to listen to music that isn't
320k (although I think they are full of it).

I think this chart is about right:

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/8650/bitratevsaudioquality.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

------------------------------ ASUS P7H55D-M Evo |Intel i5 661 3.33 OC@4.00 GHz |VisionTEK ATI Radeon 5770 |4GB Crucial DDR3 1066 |Western Digital WD20EARS 2TB HDD |Western Digital WD5000AVDS 500GB HDD | Thermaltake TR2 600W PSU |Samsung DVD-RW |Antec Fusion Black HTPC Case |Windows 7
Reply to jsphdickens

jsphdickens wrote :

I don't think most people would equate 128k to CD quality. I like at least 192k, and I know audiophiles that insist that they can't stand to listen to music that isn't
320k (although I think they are full of it).

I think this chart is about right:

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441 [...] uality.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us



...and now we know why there are different bitrates!

No doubt there are some that can detect the difference between 128 and 320 or even 620, but at nearly 60 years of age, I'm not one of them!

Reply to Martin Crandall

I didn't know a 2GB mp3 player has "a lot of capacity."

128kbps is CD quality eh.

Well if you can't see the difference between 480p and 1080p then they would also be the same quality.


Message edited by astrallite on 09-13-2010 at 05:58:08 AM
Reply to astrallite

What about a Sony Walkman. I have one and it's been working great with drag and drop, no need for software.

------------------------------ Phenom II X4
Gigabyte:board
GPU : Geforce gtx 460
500gb WD!
Reply to MechaNintendoMaster

jsphdickens wrote :

I don't think most people would equate 128k to CD quality. I like at least 192k, and I know audiophiles that insist that they can't stand to listen to music that isn't
320k (although I think they are full of it).

I think this chart is about right:

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441 [...] uality.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us




Excellent discussion especially since many of us have run into an 'audiophile' insisting they can tell the difference; how many would really submit to a blind listening test? Btw, your link is dead; likely because it's now two weeks from the start of 2012 and your post was around 09/2010. Would love seeing your chart; if u happen to read this feel free to email me a link or repost it (bikemannc@gmail.com).


Message edited by bikemannc on 12-18-2011 at 07:58:12 PM
Reply to bikemannc
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > MP3 Players > good mp3 player
Go to:

There are 845 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them