Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Mobile Computing » General Mobile Computing » Tom's Comparos - Why the disparities in software used?
 

Tom's Comparos - Why the disparities in software used?

Advanced Search

RobD Homebuilt Systems : freeduck and 239 unknown users
Add a reply



Intel is purposely misleading the public with its chip naming scheme.




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote

 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Tom's Comparos - Why the disparities in software used?
 
c210pilot
Profile: stranger
More Information
n°195428
10-28-2006 at 02:31:09 PM

In the Gigabyte notebook comparison, 3dmark05 is used, but in the CPU charts, 3dmark06 is used. WHY? I wanted to see the difference between mobile Core2Duos and desktop Core2Duos, but can't be very objective when different benchmarks are used.

The CPUmark scores are interesting, they put the new Core2duos inline with Pentium 930 and 820, respectively. BTW, the naming logic is out the door. What the hell Intel? You named it with a "higher" number than the desktop models, but they are synthetically the same speed as last years dual cores.

Related Pr oduct
 Register or log in to remove.


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware UK and Ireland Forums » Mobile Computing » General Mobile Computing » Tom's Comparos - Why the disparities in software used?
 

Forum map
MyDiscussions.Net Forum, Version 2007.1
© 2000-2006 No1Dev
Page generated in 0.230 seconds
Google ads