Ad
News

IDF goes on

Published on August 24, 2000

Tom's Hardware's indepth coverage of breaking news from the Intel Developer Forum in San Jose, California, continues at tomshardware.com. Read more

Intel Forum coverage continues

Published on August 25, 2000

To read Tom's Hardware's coverage of the second day of the Intel Developer Forum, click tomshardware.com. Read more

Oi, Nvidia! Merge With AMD!

Published on June 08, 2005

Intel convinced Apple to go with Pentium processors instead of PowerPC chips in its next product generation. Read more

Send us your news!

Published on July 02, 2003

While we're constantly trawling the web for new and interesting stories to pass on to our loyal readers, it's obviously impossible for us to find them all. Read more

Last Reviews & Articles

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance and Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

On this, the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

Relatives contents
 

IP DVB to STB

Advanced Search

There are 389 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here



Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : IP DVB to STB
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

 

We have a IP STB for terrestrial use and want to add a satellite receiver to
it.

We want to send IP over a satellite link, down to a STB that has a Windows
Media decoder in it.... firstly can you do this over a one way system, that
is to say you download information basically off an IP network but you have
no path for the system to communicate back over, I would say no as TCP/IP
needs to know the packets got there, and in this system we would be only one
direction.

Also is there another way to get data to the set top box? other the the DVB
route? We have a lot at our disposal here but do not know what to use.

Thanks!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

 

"Richard Sloan" <rsloan2003@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:B5tTe.12782$I02.654533@news20.bellglobal.com:

> We have a IP STB for terrestrial use and want to add a satellite
> receiver to it.
>
> We want to send IP over a satellite link, down to a STB that has a
> Windows Media decoder in it.... firstly can you do this over a one way
> system, that is to say you download information basically off an IP
> network but you have no path for the system to communicate back over,
> I would say no as TCP/IP needs to know the packets got there, and in
> this system we would be only one direction.
>
> Also is there another way to get data to the set top box? other the
> the DVB route? We have a lot at our disposal here but do not know what
> to use.
>
> Thanks!
>
>

In theory (I don't know too much about IP video), you could have a
server PC with a DVB-S PCI tuner, which serves the received IP packets
to the STBs.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

 

Richard Sloan wrote:
> We have a IP STB for terrestrial use and want to add a satellite receiver to
> it.
>
> We want to send IP over a satellite link, down to a STB that has a Windows
> Media decoder in it.... firstly can you do this over a one way system, that
> is to say you download information basically off an IP network but you have
> no path for the system to communicate back over, I would say no as TCP/IP
> needs to know the packets got there, and in this system we would be only one
> direction.
>
> Also is there another way to get data to the set top box? other the the DVB
> route? We have a lot at our disposal here but do not know what to use.
>
> Thanks!

A TCP/IP link does need 2-way communication. A one-way satellite link is often
used in conjunction with a modem link for the return path. Or you could set
up a two-way satellite link with the appropriate service provider.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

 

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:39:41 -0700, Zoyburg <rats@attib.com> wrote:

>Richard Sloan wrote:
>> We have a IP STB for terrestrial use and want to add a satellite receiver to
>> it.
>>
>> We want to send IP over a satellite link, down to a STB that has a Windows
>> Media decoder in it.... firstly can you do this over a one way system, that
>> is to say you download information basically off an IP network but you have
>> no path for the system to communicate back over, I would say no as TCP/IP
>> needs to know the packets got there, and in this system we would be only one
>> direction.
>>
>> Also is there another way to get data to the set top box? other the the DVB
>> route? We have a lot at our disposal here but do not know what to use.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>A TCP/IP link does need 2-way communication.

UDP, however, does not. In fact, UDP multicast would seem to be ideal
for this application. Assuming, of course, that all of the routers
along the path through the satellite provider support IP multicast...



Go to:
 

Google ads