Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > I7 3960x Bottleneck?

I7 3960x Bottleneck?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs I7 3960x Bottleneck?

Word :    Username :           
 

Hello. I've been researching for a new build. I think I'm gonna wait til April for Kepler and IB, but am still considering SB. Why does this test consider their i7 not able to handle some of the GPU setups and it being a bottleneck?

link [url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7950-overclock-crossfire-benchmark,3123-4.html][/url]

I always read about how most games aren't limited by the CPU. Thank you.

Reply to dbhelman
Register or log in to remove.

there is no current cards out at the moment and probably for the next few years that will bottleneck an i7 SB...

------------------------------ |i7 920 D0@3.6 |CNPS10 flex |ex58-ud5 |6Gig 1333 C7 |HD 5870
|G11 keyboard|X-fi Xtreme |G930 |3x1tb SpinPoint f3's raid 0 |thermaltake tp 850watt |antec 902
|Rat 7 contagion |Razer Destructor mat |bamboo pen'N'touch | 3d pro stick |nitro wheel |360 pad
Reply to HEXiT

When you look at benchmarks for CPU performance in games and many of the CPU's, with same GPU, show the same fps then that is an indication that the GPU has reached its limit. On the other hand when you see that you got improvement with better CPU's still using the same GPU then the CPU is the limiting factor!

Reply to rolli59

Agreed. Did I read the article wrong? Sorry the link didn't post correctly. I understand that pcie3 won't be useful for a while and that some games/software don't make effienct use of cpu vs gpu power.

Reply to dbhelman

pci 3.0 wont become useful until ivy bridge an no theres not a card set up you can throw at a sandy bridge that will bottleneck it

Reply to dummos

HEXiT wrote :

there is no current cards out at the moment and probably for the next few years that will bottleneck an i7 SB...


dual 7970s prolly would bottleneck a stock sb i7 in some games.

Reply to cbrunnem

That's how I read the review. It said the i7 wasn't quite enough processing power for some of the dual and quad gpu setups in some games. It specifically mentioned it about skyrim and also said something about the software design being optimized for consoles.

Reply to dbhelman

dbhelman wrote :

software design being optimized for consoles.


That is where we are being screwed :cry:

------------------------------ Switching over to watercooling soon....
Reply to amuffin


From:
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 123-8.html

Quote :

Even at 4.2 GHz, our Core i7-3960X is the primary bottleneck at 1680x1050 and 1920x1080.


Reply to dbhelman

From:
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 123-4.html

Quote :

We've transitioned our test platform for graphics to a Sandy Bridge-E-based Core i7-3960X overclocked to 4.2 GHz. You'll notice that, in some cases, that's still not enough processing power to let some of our more demanding two- and four-GPU configurations really stretch their legs.

Reply to dbhelman

dbhelman wrote :

From:
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 123-8.html

Quote :

Even at 4.2 GHz, our Core i7-3960X is the primary bottleneck at 1680x1050 and 1920x1080.




This is because the resolution is too low for the gPUs. The GPUs are basically so powerful that that resolution relies on the CPU more than the GPU does. Not that the 3970X is weak, just that its doing most of the work at those res.

dbhelman wrote :

From:
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 123-4.html

Quote :

We've transitioned our test platform for graphics to a Sandy Bridge-E-based Core i7-3960X overclocked to 4.2 GHz. You'll notice that, in some cases, that's still not enough processing power to let some of our more demanding two- and four-GPU configurations really stretch their legs.




The biggest problem with three or four GPUs is that they don't scale very well. Two is pretty good these days. Near 100%. But 4 normally isn't, and for the most part you need to play at uber high res to even begin to utilize that much power.

Just to say it plainly, the i7 3K series will be more than powerful enough for probably the next 3 gens of GPUs.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290513.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Thank you for some insight. Excuse my ignorance, but it seems it could be an issue with how the CPU and GPU's communicate with each other...? Native PCI-E 3.0 potentially could allow better transfer rates in the future?

Reply to dbhelman

dbhelman wrote :

Thank you for some insight. Excuse my ignorance, but it seems it could be an issue with how the CPU and GPU's communicate with each other...? Native PCI-E 3.0 potentially could allow better transfer rates in the future?



Yes PCIe 3 will allow for 2x the transfer rates of PCIe 2. Just as PCie 2 is 2x that of PCIe 1. But it will probably be a few more gens of GPUs before they even begin to saturate PCIe 3 since even PCIe 2.0 x16 is not even saturated.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2290513.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > I7 3960x Bottleneck?
Go to:

There are 306 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Latest best answer
Battery Compatibility issues in Windows XP on Gateway
By hang-the-9, 61 days ago:

If this is a 3rd party battery, issues like this are pretty much to be expected. If it's...

They won a badge
Join us in greeting them