I voted for the X6 T, because at their current price point and overall performance, they offer loads of value. In a value perspective, they are very hard to beat right now.
------------------------------Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa Reply to radnor
I voted for the X6 T, because at their current price point and overall performance, they offer loads of value. In a value perspective, they are very hard to beat right now.
Very very true
------------------------------AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.7Ghz, Palit GTX 460 1GB 800Mhz SLI, Asus Sabertooth 990FX, Akasa VenomToxic, Corsair Dominator 8GB 1333Mhz, 1x Seagate 120Gb boot disk, 1x Samsung 1Tb storage, XFX XXX Black Edition 850w, 22" Bush LED 1920x1080, Corsair Hydro H70 Reply to sonnyd09
I am a mere mortal so voting for anything out of my affordability bracket is silly or obviously a 3960X would have been the choice, right now the 2500K does the job with my 560Ti, I will wait on Ivybridge and perhaps move up to the i7 in that architecture.
I am a mere mortal so voting for anything out of my affordability bracket is silly or obviously a 3960X would have been the choice, right now the 2500K does the job with my 560Ti, I will wait on Ivybridge and perhaps move up to the i7 in that architecture.
Haha yeah! I wish I could afford that too, oh well, lol. My 1090T is fine for me though.
------------------------------AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.7Ghz, Palit GTX 460 1GB 800Mhz SLI, Asus Sabertooth 990FX, Akasa VenomToxic, Corsair Dominator 8GB 1333Mhz, 1x Seagate 120Gb boot disk, 1x Samsung 1Tb storage, XFX XXX Black Edition 850w, 22" Bush LED 1920x1080, Corsair Hydro H70 Reply to sonnyd09
Today, I want to get an idea of where the community stands in terms of CPU selection.
I have selected a few types of cpu from AMD and Intel, so you can select your favourite!
I personally prefer AMD as it's affordable and has great band for your buck.
feel free to post a reply explaining why!
Sonny
EDIT:
Perhaps the question was too vague, I'll rephrase...
Lets say, under your own wallet, which one would you choose?
I voted for the FX as it is the closest thing to what I would get, which is a pair of Opteron 6238s. Why? My board takes them and they have a good compromise between clock speed, number of cores, and price, and would be a good upgrade over the Opteron 6128s I currently have in there. Intel doesn't really have anything all that interesting for workstations right now; they are still selling the same LGA1366 Westmeres for the same prices that they did when I built this machine in the middle of 2010 Intel is very overdue on that LGA2011 Xeon E5 and E7 launch...
Message edited by MU_Engineer on 02-03-2012 at 04:55:06 PM
I chose the 3960X because it represented the only LGA2011 entry. Personally, I'll be picking up the $284.99 4c/4ht 3820 in a few weeks when it ships. Tough to beat a X79 setup that will rival 2600k upper tier Z68 in price.
First I'd never consider a 2700K as it's the same exact thing as the 2600K with just a single multiplier increase for a substantial increase in cost. This represents a trend Intel and AMD have both held over the years, end of life rebranding. Unless you plan to run these cpus at stock speeds, they offer no difference whatsoever.
More importantly the 3820 represents a price/performance equal to the 2600K, but doing so on a much more robust platorm, LGA2011.
If I absolutely had to place an order for a CPU within the next 24 hours it would be either the i5-2500k or the i7-2600k (since I do a little bit of video encoding where HT comes in handy).
------------------------------Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP
Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth. Reply to jaguarskx
2500K; $180 at Micro Center, plus the day I picked it up they were doing a bundle deal for $60 off the price of any Z68 mobo. I purchased a P8Z68-V Pro, for a total of ~$350 (with tax) for both. This is my first homebuild so I don't have much PC experience, but I'm telling you, this chip is faster than lightning and easy to overclock. Now tell me how AMD is the "bang-for-your-buck king"? I realize that lots of people in the world do not live close to a Micro Center, but even at $220-$250 this processor still beats the FX-8150.