Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > What's Your System Rating Scores?

What's Your System Rating Scores?

Forum CPU & Components : Other Components What's Your System Rating Scores?

Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

What do you guys get on your CPU/RAM/GPU?
My Scores is:
i7-950(3841MHz at 1.225v stable) - 7.7(7.5 on stock clock)
KingstonHyperX KHX1800C9D3K2/4G(OC 2009MHz 9-10-9-24 stable) - 7.9(7.8 on stock clocks & Timing)
GT 220(OC at 685/1520/885 stable) - 6.6(6.5 on stocks clocks)

My OC on these hardware gave me a pretty high boost around 3 FPS+ in A.V.A(Alliance of Villiant Arms) game :D...

Reply to LegendKiller
Register or log in to remove.

most people don't bench using windows index, as it is not reliant on hardware specs alone. 3dmark and PCmark are both good, and give you the option to compare your scores versus all other users' submitted scores.

Reply to festerovic

but to answer your question, cpu 7.6, ram 7.6, graphics 7.8, 3d graphics 7.8 and disk 5.9.

Reply to festerovic

LOL, What kind of CPU/RAM/GPU is it? BTW Im using Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit... The Scores are showing some good performance when it's increased by 1 or 2 :D... I never knew what i7-2600k scores and i would like to know :D and other GPU/RAM/CPU... Who here got 7.9/7.9/7.9/7.9? LOL

Reply to LegendKiller

Not really on topic, but a GT220 is a bit of a waste compared to the rest of the machine..

Reply to Herr_Koos

I do got the GTs 450 but my bro's using it for his adobe cs5.5 stuff...

Reply to LegendKiller

Gaming is much more important. Take it back.

Reply to Herr_Koos

yea i lol'd when i saw the gt220 mine are cpu 7.6, ram 5.5, graphics 7.1, 3d 7.1, hdd 5.4 < not bad for a $200 PC

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/1725961.png
Reply to AstroTC

AMD Phenom II x4 965 Black Edition - 7.3
Kingston HyperX 1066Mhz 4GB - 7.4
GTX 570 Sonic Platinum - 7.9
HDD - 5.9

------------------------------ "He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life."
Reply to cooky1992

All 7.4's except the HDD - 5.9 lol
Phenom II x6 1055T
Radeon 5770
8GB OCZ 1066MHz
Hitachi 1TB

Reply to kiren

Hey I will make you feel good about your system

Core2Duo E4500 at 2.93 ghz - 6.4
Gskill DDR2-800 CL5 - 5.9
MSI HD 5670 low profile 512m GDDR5 OCd 850/1050 - 7.0
gaming graphics - 7.0
WD Velociraptor HLFS 160gb 10k rpm - 5.9

$300 dollar Dell Optiplex 745 Baby!

Go ahead and laugh now :)

Reply to king smp

LegendKiller wrote :

I do got the GTs 450 but my bro's using it for his adobe cs5.5 stuff...


GTS 450 isn't much better... LOL

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

C'mon Mal put your digits up
What was Heavy Hitter WEI?

Reply to king smp

it's still running the i5-760 and not the i7-870, with the holiday shipping is delayed a few days; same with the second GTX 560 Ti.
I can list all of them but the heavy hitter right now..
@ stock settings:

 

955BE - 7.3
4GB DDR2 1066MHz - 7.5
GTX 460 (768mb) - 7.6/7.6
10K Raptor - 5.9
----------------
440 - 6.8
4GB DDR2 800 - 7.2
GTS 250 - 7.0/7.0
320GB Cuda - 5.8
----------------
i5-760 - 7.5
DDR3 1600 - 7.7
SLI - GTX 460 SSC+ - 7.9/7.9
Agility 2 - 7.7
----------------
C2D T7200 - 5.4
4GB DDR2 800 - 5.5 (defaults to 533MHz)
NVS 110M TurboCache - 5.3/3.6 (might be wrong about that, not feel like booting it up.)
160GB - 5.3

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by malmental on 10-18-2011 at 03:51:52 AM
------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

festerovic wrote :

most people don't bench using windows index, as it is not reliant on hardware specs alone. 3dmark and PCmark are both good, and give you the option to compare your scores versus all other users' submitted scores.




^+1 Agree

I use Cinebench 10.5 and 11
Passmark Performance Test 7.0
3Dmark06 (though it is getting old- i am afraid to try 3Dmark11-too embarassing LOL)
Sisoft Sandra Lite

the Passmark sometimes seems weird to me-dont always agree with scores on some CPUs

also on Cinebench 11 I got a 37.xx on OpenGL which I dont understand since
there is no way my CPU/GPU (C2D 2.93/HD 5670) should score that high
my DX render is 1.65 which is inline with comparable systems

those are about the best free benches
Sandra and Passmark are good becuase it tests whole system
might have a killer CPU but if your HD or GPU is slow it will let you know what to upgrade

Reply to king smp

malmental wrote :

it's still running the i5-760 and not the i7-870, with the holiday shipping is delayed a few days; same with the second GTX 560 Ti.
I can list all of them but the heavy hitter right now..




I am curious what the HH is now
so when you do your upgrade I can see the improvement
Freakin' WEI is useless usually but it is nice to see it go up with upgrades

Reply to king smp

king smp wrote :

I am curious what the HH is now
so when you do your upgrade I can see the improvement
Freakin' WEI is useless usually but it is nice to see it go up with upgrades


edit last posting.

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

WEI.
it's a good idea but flawed technology.
even so it still can be useful to accumulate data and get a feel for other hardware comparisons (WEI scores).
I can tell you what the hardware (in question) should score @ stock levels
and it doesn't matter if were talking RAM, GPU, or CPU.
just because it's a flawed system it has been constantly flawed, therefore it actually has remained consistent with it's data and results.

 

(some people need to realize that other processes running in the background and screen resolution/monitor(s) also matters in WEI scoring..)

 

but yes, it's not an accurate way of judging your unit and it's potential.
I agree..

 



Message edited by malmental on 07-04-2011 at 09:51:35 PM
------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

i5-760 - 7.5
DDR3 1600 - 7.7
GTx 560 Ti - 7.7/7.7
Vertex II - 7.6

Nice with upgrades your lowest score is going to be 7.6 LOL

Explain why DDR3-1600 is same as DDR2-1066 at 7.5?
Is it the CL rating of the DDR2?
between the better bandwidth and higher freq the DDR3 should be higher shouldnt it?

Reply to king smp

I am going to go play with 3Dmark11
might as well see how crappy my system is
I hope it has some cool graphics anyway

Reply to king smp

I think it is the latency, I have seen DDR2 800MHz score 7.5 as well..

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

I got a lousy score with my DDR2-800 CL5 Gskill
If I had a mobo I could play with timings maybe I could get them over 6.0
right now they are at 5-5-5-15
I heard their are some software solutions for changing timings on OEM systems
but doesnt seem worth the trouble to me

Reply to king smp

check and see if it's running in dual or single channel mode..

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

it is in dual
4 x1gb sticks
matching pairs

I just ran 3DMark11 and I am ready to puke
P898 marks

WTF
I knew I was going to suck but not that bad
A friggin E5200 and a HD 5670 was about double my score!

On Passmark my E4500 2.2/800fsb OCd to 2.93/1066fsb
scores a 2090 in CPU score
which is higher than a Pentium Dual Core E6700 3.2

so I should be higher than a E5200

Oh well I guess I should be happy this Piece of Sh@T Dell could even run the test

Why do GPU makers make DX11 cards like the HD5670
only way you can run full DX11 is at 800x600
those demos looked like a fast slideshow LOL

@OP sorry for hijacking
still talking about benchmarks though

Reply to king smp

Here is my info...

 

Processor: Intel i7 920 @ 3.4 - 7.6
Memory (RAM): OCZ Platinum DDR3 1600 - 7.6
Graphics: EVGA GTX 560 Ti SC in SLI - 7.9
Gaming Graphics: EVGA GTX 560 Ti SC in SLI - 7.9
Primary Hard Disk: OCZ Vertex II 240 GB - 7.8

 

http://i964.photobucket.com/albums/ae127/Tecmo34/Other%20PC%20pics/WEIScore.png


Message edited by tecmo34 on 07-04-2011 at 11:03:08 PM
------------------------------ Recommended Builds by Usage
Step-by-Step Guide to Building a PC
Reply to tecmo34

A Vertex II still cant score 7.9!
they really made that WEI HD impossible

also interesting that festerovic has a 2600k and scored 7.6
and you scored 7.6 with a 920 @ 3.4

interesting comparison between I7 first gen and second gen

Reply to king smp

The First Generation is still the best but price is way too high(990X) but as the Ivy Bridge coming out, the price for 990x would be probably around $700 or so... AND About my Evga GTs 450, im planing to SLI them to score probably 7.9 at least and as a single card, it scored 7.7(With OC from 822 to 900/1800/2050)... I dont really like the 3DMark and PCMark because It doesn't let me do the setting(Graphic) and I also hate how it's not free... Also I don't like to create accounts...

Does anyone know if an i7-9xx(Not the X series) Can defeat an i5-2500k? Some people said that the 2500k doesn't support HTT which isn't as good as an i7-9xx(Not the X series)... Since SB is 15% faster, im sure my i7-950 at 3.8GHz can defeat 2500k at stock BUT i dont get how it can defeat my i7-950(at stock) when it doesn't have HTT...

Reply to LegendKiller

@king smp:
and my 2600k is at 4.4ghz. THe same system does P29000 on 3dmarkvantage (as in, its not misconfigured)

@ the RAM index, when I had 4 gigs of the same RAM, my memory score was 7.2. When I added the second stick, it went up to 7.6. Also, a single 6850 scored 6.9. crosfired it went to 7.8

Reply to festerovic

festerovic wrote :

@king smp:
and my 2600k is at 4.4ghz. THe same system does P29000 on 3dmarkvantage (as in, its not misconfigured)

Interesting on the 3DMark Vantage score. My i7 920 | GTX 560 Ti SLI setup scored P35000. It just goes to show how much 3DMark Vantage favors Nvidia cards over ATI, specially for the fact my cards aren't that much more powerful than yours. Along with your CPU being the more powerful CPU.

------------------------------ Recommended Builds by Usage
Step-by-Step Guide to Building a PC
Reply to tecmo34

the cpu gets tuned out though, i got roughly the same score with i7 920 @ 3.4ghz. Yeah you have to turn off the Physx for vantage to do the scores apples to apples. I did overclock the living ish out of my cards. The cpu tests were noticeably different though.

Reply to festerovic

Talking about PhysX, Should i select my CPU for PhysX or VideoCard because im currently using the GT 220 and it doesn't seem to improve anything(Performance for PhysX) when i select CPU nor VideoCard...

Reply to LegendKiller

You can try your CPU but with the GT 220, it just really doesn't have the power to push "PhysX" really. It is more of an OEM type card for basic use and not really gaming related that utilizes PhysX more.

------------------------------ Recommended Builds by Usage
Step-by-Step Guide to Building a PC
Reply to tecmo34

agree, try CPU.
GT 220 shouldn't even if it is on the Phys-X list..

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

Also, Why does my games Crashes when I Enable PhysX in M.E.(Mirrors Edge)??? Also how do i enable PhysX for the Batman? I searched on google and they dont gives me clues since It's a Cracked version(Downloaded instead of buy)... IDK How to enable PhysX...

Reply to LegendKiller

by default it should be enabled, especially if you have a phys-x qualified card.
secondly the options within the game itself and look for advanced display settings..
check nVidia control panel as well.
have you checked to verify if the GT 220 is phys-x able.?

 

just checked and it is however I do not know why since it's such a weak card..
oh well.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/physx_gpus.html


Message edited by malmental on 08-14-2011 at 06:14:11 PM
------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

updated drivers to the GTX 460 Twin Frozr II SOC (768mb) 192-bit GDDR5,
now get 7.6/7.6 in gfx area just like reference GTX 460 1GB..
(nVidia 280.xxx)
i think that's sick for a non-gaming unit..


Message edited by malmental on 08-14-2011 at 04:13:42 PM
------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

2500K @ 4.8GHz: 7.7
G.Skill 12GB 1600 CL9: 7.8
Palit GTX 570 Sonic (830 core, 2100 memory): 7.9/7.9
Kingston 96GB SATA2 SSD: 7.2

------------------------------ Jack-Booted Thug Spreading Intel Sandy Bridge Propaganda
Member of the Official TH Water Cooling Club
|2500K CPU|12GB RAM|570 GPU|96GB SSD|1TB HDD|
Reply to Leaps-from-Shadows

updated scores with updated drivers and clock on i5-760:

 

955BE - 7.3
4GB DDR2 1066MHz - 7.5
GTX 460 (768mb) - 7.6/7.6
10K Raptor - 5.9
----------------
440 - 6.8
4GB DDR2 800 - 7.2
GTS 250 - 7.0/7.0
320GB Cuda - 5.8
----------------
i5-760 - 7.5
8GB DDR3 1600 - 7.7
SLI - GTX 460 SSC+ - 7.9/7.9
Agility 2 - 7.7
(not in SLI currently, only running single card right now)


Message edited by malmental on 10-18-2011 at 03:52:26 AM
------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

I'm kinda surprised that my 64GB crucial m4 manages to score a 7.9.

Reply to Dgriffs

^
actually the reports on it a very good.
A+ in fact..

------------------------------ A+, Net+, MCDST, DSCE (Dell)
Boltzmann constant squared
Reply to malmental

[img]http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/208/ratingn.jpg Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/img]

I'm getting low on hard disk.. Will change to SSD for the better results


Message edited by azmanmanz on 08-16-2011 at 07:40:29 PM
Reply to azmanmanz

Try PerformanceTest guys, it's a GREAT program. When I was in Best Buy choosing a LT for my bud, I installed it on every single laptop (that interested) xD.

Will post ratings when I get home, BTW first post :)

Reply to stratwars

CPU - Intel i7 2600k - [stock clock 3.4Ghz] Rating 7.8
RAM - Corsair 8GB - Rating 7.8
GPU - HD 5850 1GB DDR5 [OC 25%] -Rating 7.8
1TB - Seagate Barracuda 7200 - Rating 5.9
OS - Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit


Message edited by azmanmanz on 08-17-2011 at 11:00:52 AM
Reply to azmanmanz

I haven't seen one of these willy waving posts for a while, so I might as well get mine out!
Cpu - 7.8 i52500k
Memory - 7.9 8gig corsair xms3 1600
Graphics - 7.9 for both readings 2x GTX470 in Sli
Hdd - 7.9 Corsair Gt3

Now you would think you wouldn't need anymore if windows XI was anything to go by,
but using a propper bench marker shows that it can be lacking.
Shame I'm skint, I've got a massive upgrade bug atm

Reply to xupaguy

7.5, 7.9, 7.8, 5.9

------------------------------ sllaw eht no nettirw gnihtemos saw ecno ereht
Reply to esrever

May as well...

i5-2500K - 7.5
8gb Kingston - 7.7
XFX 6850 - 7.7
WD Caviar Black 1TB - 5.9

Reply to O762

i5-750 - 7.3
8gb ripjaw - 7.5
gtx 460 sli - 7.6
hdd - 5.9

Reply to cognitoo
Register or log in to remove.
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > Other Components > What's Your System Rating Scores?
Go to:

There are 176 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Latest best answer
Battery Compatibility issues in Windows XP on Gateway
By hang-the-9, 61 days ago:

If this is a 3rd party battery, issues like this are pretty much to be expected. If it's...

They won a badge
Join us in greeting them