Patriot does not state in its drive specs which benchmark software they use for their advertised Read/Write speeds, but most SandForce based SSDs use ATTO benchmark software, not CrystalDiskMark.
You're definitely using SATA III. SATA II is capped at 3.0Gb/s or 375MB/s. 416MB/s wouldn't be possible on SATA II.
Those are pretty good CrystalDiskMark numbers for SandForce. My bet would be that when you test with ATTO like Dereck47 says you'll get teh 500MB/s or 550MB/s numbers that Patriot advertises, but in all reality it doesn't make much of a difference. Even if you squeeze the extra 15% out of your drive you won't notice a difference in practice - it will just be a little extra super crazy fast.
In case you're wondering, the difference between ATTO and other benchmark software is that ATTO tests compressible data which is where SandForce excels. Some other benchmarks don't use compressible data.
The printscreen is to small for me to read your results.
ATTO benchmark software uses highly compressible data to test read/write speeds.
CrystalDiskMark benchmark software uses highly incompressible data to test read/write speeds.
SandForce based SSDs work best with data that can be compressed.
Unfortunate for you that HD video editing uses files that are highly incompressible so your drive is not the best for what you are doing.
Message edited by Dereck47 on 02-01-2012 at 08:46:06 PM
A drive like a Crucial M4 or Samsung 830 or something else that doesn't use SandForce. Don't worry, though. SandForce drives work fine with incompressible data - it's just that they really shine with compressible data. You've seen the difference in the two benchmarks. Your drive is plenty fast in the CrystalDiskMark benchmark.
------------------------------Still don't have a dropbox account? You should get one. Use this link and help us both out: dropbox Reply to danraies